Feels wrong to answer to such a small part of such a long post but: do you know what those countries have in common? They have compulsory military service. I think the Swiss keep their rifles from that military service actually, as they do some days out of each year of service after their main one.Switzerland and Israel also have a large number of guns per capita, and have safer records than most countries that do not.
There might be something to that - one of the things they train you in the military is, obviously, gun safety and responsibility. There could be advantages to instituting a course like that.Feels wrong to answer to such a small part of such a long post but: do you know what those countries have in common? They have compulsory military service. I think the Swiss keep their rifles from that military service actually, as they do some days out of each year of service after their main one.
Also, "gun culture" isn't represented only in the # of guns.
Like I said, require a licensing program for gun ownership, just like driving a car. I'm sure there are a lot of legal hurdles that would make that difficult, but it still seems like a good idea.There might be something to that - one of the things they train you in the military is, obviously, gun safety and responsibility. There could be advantages to instituting a course like that.
I don't think that's enough. You don't have to own a gun to steal and shoot one. I'm thinking along the lines of making it manditory school curricula. Plus, that avoids the whole "gun registration" pit trap.Like I said, require a licensing program for gun ownership, just like driving a car. I'm sure there are a lot of legal hurdles that would make that difficult, but it still seems like a good idea.
All private gun sales (those not involving a professional gun dealer) do not require a background check.Is it true that in the USA that most gun show sales and second hand sales of guns do not in fact require a background check of any kind?
All private gun sales (those not involving a professional gun dealer) do not require a background check.
Because guns still have serial numbers, and thus can usually be traced back through owners, or at least to their original point of sale, so it behooves anyone selling a gun to get paperwork on it showing who they sold it to and when, in case it's found to have been used in the commission of a criminal act.How do you stop morons from privately selling guns to sociopaths and criminals? (I'm asking this stuff honestly to learn... not to just be a dick).
Up here in Canada we can sell guns privately too but we have to make sure that the buyer has a valid PAL (possession and aquisition license) with the correct type (restricted vs non-restricted) and there's even a dedicated phone number for inquiries to make sure a PAL is valid. That's just for a non-restricted firearm (shotguns, long rifles, etc). Restricted firearms require way more hoops to jumped through just for a private sale. http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/fs-fd/sell-vendre-eng.htm
Personally I keep wondering how far we're from the:
future...
That depends on the state. Some states have mandatory classes for ownership. And GB is wrong above. In some states it is mandatory to do a background check on private sales. But it depends on the stateI don't think anyone would ever argue against gun safety education... well maybe if they're crazy.
So do you have to have any kind of licensing or anything to buy a firearm then? I'm guessing that because of the way it's entrenched in the second amendment you can't require that sort of thing due to it "infringing" (which kind of sucks because needing a license to purchase firearms does create an easy and convenient way to both force people to undergo proper background checks as well as gun safety courses).
Depends on the firearm, depends on the state. Most states require background checks for handguns, along with waiting periods. Some states even ban their sales outright (Illinois), 2nd amendment be damned, though the supreme court takes a dim view of such things when they get around to looking at them. You do have to get a permit to carry a concealed gun, and some states (including Texas, ironically) prohibit the open carrying of firearms.I don't think anyone would ever argue against gun safety education... well maybe if they're crazy.
So do you have to have any kind of licensing or anything to buy a firearm then? I'm guessing that because of the way it's entrenched in the second amendment you can't require that sort of thing due to it "infringing" (which kind of sucks because needing a license to purchase firearms does create an easy and convenient way to both force people to undergo proper background checks as well as gun safety courses).
*NobodyI'm not getting into any arguments here. I'm just going to plug the book No One Left To Hate by Elliot Aronson again.
Really, Gas, do you really need to be a pedantic ass in this thread?*Nobody
Not about need. All want.Really, Gas, do you really need to be a pedantic ass in this thread?
Couldn't help myself. But yes, that'd be a good book to read, that tries to look at underlying causes and solutions beyond simple gun control.Really, Gas, do you really need to be a pedantic ass in this thread?
I agree. We've already had at least two more people arrested for making threats on elementary schools over Facebook since Friday, one of them semi-local to Seattle. In that case it was a 19 year old guy who describes himself as an internet troll who was just posting threats to get a rise out of his readers, but who will hopefully discover that there's a big difference between posting things like "U mad bro??" and posting things like "If gun control laws get stricter because of this shooting, I'm going to take my sawed-off shotgun and shoot up every school in a 100 mile radius." The first is trolling and the second is a felony for making threats over the internet, and while I really hope the prosecutor's office decides to make an example out of this morally-bankrupt douche canoe, I hope the press doesn't jump all over it and give us even more attention starved copy-cats.I just wish our media would quit treating serial killers and mass shooters like rock-star, world record holders. While this one guy holds the record for killing college students, this shooter holds the record for killing 1st graders...
I second this, man. Your passionate defense of children is absolutely admirable, but I think this news and the related stuff might be taking a toll on you.Zap, I know you feel really strongly about this, but looking at your posts in this thread, I think you should think about stepping away from this topic for awhile. And I say this as a fellow halforumer that's concerned.
The Death Penalty has been proven ineffective as a deterrent, so no, we don't really need to.These are the people we can catch and make an example of, and we need to.
It is. I mean, I work with kids. It makes me sick to my core that shit like this happens, and that it could be prevented. Maybe you guys are right.I second this, man. Your passionate defense of children is absolutely admirable, but I think this news and the related stuff might be taking a toll on you.
Turn off the news for awhile, that stuff can poison you.It is. I mean, I work with kids. It makes me sick to my core that shit like this happens, and that it could be prevented. Maybe you guys are right.
I was afraid this was going to happen.Even worse, the damn Westboro Baptists want to protest the funerals.
We had that meeting this morning, too. Not easy. My principal was fighting back misty eyes.I've blocked the people on my Facebook who wont stop reporting stuff about it, Zappit. I work with kids too, and it's not easy to keep thinking about all this. We had a meeting today to review safety procedures, and some of us cried in the middle of it. It's too much.