Me niether, it's hasn't been the same for a while now.
"he announced it over twitter" is nice, but I'm a regular visitor of his site, and I still have no clue. No matter the reason, a post on the site is a minimum.And when has he done that? Because you can't say that about this latest gap, since there was a reason, he announced it over twitter.
One.How many sundays has foxtrot missed?
Twitter doesn't count. I follow his Twitter and I had no idea he'd said anything about the hiatus. If it's not on the site where someone goes to read the comic, it's not announcement to all the readers of his comic.And when has he done that? Because you can't say that about this latest gap, since there was a reason, he announced it over twitter.
1, 1 week of a rerun. Because of a 30-minute late strip.One.
Well, one strip that was late by the syndicate's standards. I'm not sure how many weeks were reruns
Speaking of artists who stop when they feel the comic has run it's course, does anyone have any idea about the existence of a particular newspaper comic; I believe it was called "James" and it ran in the late 90s or early 2000s. It only lasted a year or two, and maybe filled up two collections. It was a very simply drawn comic about a toddler named James (assuming that was the name of the comic). I had one of the collections, and I was amazed by how intelligent and adorable the comic was. I would go so far as to compare it to Watterson on an intellectual basis.Maybe a more apt comparison for Scott would be Jim Davis (creator of Garfield, in case someone wasn't familiar with his name). Davis has made no secret that he was originally in marketing/graphic design and wanted to create a character that he could use to merchandise. Sort of the antithesis of Watterson. Obviously it worked, and I believe Davis handed over the daily art and writing duties to "ghost artists" 20(? something like that) years ago. I'd also say that Garfield still exists in daily strip form because of it's familiarity through marketing, because it really hasn't had a laugh out loud strip since maybe the 80's, possibly the early 90's.
Then again, there's a swath of comic strips that remain in syndication because they're familiar, not because they're funny or entertaining anymore. Sad as it is to see them go sometimes, I have respect for artists that know when they're done telling their stories and end their strips.
Thank you, sir! You beat me to the revelation.
Penny Arcade still links it from their site. Which is probably its only source of hits.He doesn't seem to have any links on the site to his other comic child, The Trenches.
I figured it was just the result of laziness but since the layout just received an upgrade that doesn't explain it anymore.
Is it another abandoned strip?
I also don't think Kurtz has anything to do with the comic anymore. Previously he was just doing the art, and now someone else is.Penny Arcade still links it from their site. Which is probably its only source of hits.
He was doing the art... then he had his gofer doing the art... now someone else is doing that art because apparently even his gofer is too good for it. Which is a shame because I actually like Trenches more than PVP, even as flawed as it is.I also don't think Kurtz has anything to do with the comic anymore. Previously he was just doing the art, and now someone else is.
Yeah, think of all you could have done instead.Man, it's been a while since I've been to PvP. I remember when it was a part of my daily ritual. Depressing.
Dude, he already has two kids. He's no @stienman, you know.Yeah, think of all you could have done instead.
I can't remember the last time I looked at this thread OR PVP but here I am. Totally not surprised that the same problems are happening.So with multiple artists working on the strip, he still can't get one done for Monday. Awesome.