An example of good overuse: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles.
An example of bad overuse: The Adventures of Ford Fairlane (I assume. I haven't seen it)
--Patrick
I agree. I suspect it's an easy choice for the studio. The news coverage about the Fantastic Four will be about "the Fantastic Four will finally be in a good movie" and "what Marvel Studios will do with them?" The news coverage about the X-Men will be caught up in "what should they do with the existing properties?" and "who could possibly replace Hugh Jackman ?"I know X-Men are more popular, but I'm hoping Fantastic Four will take priority for some damage control. X-Men already have some good movies; Fantastic Four have none.
Oh absolutely. The character I'm happiest to see coming into the MCU is Doctor Doom.I agree. I suspect it's an easy choice for the studio. The news coverage about the Fantastic Four will be about "the Fantastic Four will finally be in a good movie" and "what Marvel Studios will do with them?" The news coverage about the X-Men will be caught up in "what should they do with the existing properties?" and "who could possibly replace Hugh Jackman ?"
Of course, the most important part of this deal (from the MCU perspective) isn't either superteam. It's the catalog of villains and supporting characters that come along with them.
Oh absolutely. The character I'm happiest to see coming into the MCU is Doctor Doom.
Stick him in a humorous movie like Thor-Rag, and I could see it.I'm looking forward to the MCU's treatment of Doom. He's supposed to be a large ham. Understatement is unworthy of DOOM.
I think in that case they would need to be careful he doesn't come off like Ronin in Guardians of the Galaxy though, just the butt of other characters' jokes, because the smart thing would be to use him like Loki, in multiple movies. Marvel now has many of their best villains available for their films and shouldn't waste them.Stick him in a humorous movie like Thor-Rag, and I could see it.
For a few seconds there i was wondering how i missed a Hawkeye cameo in GotG...come off like Ronin in Guardians of the Galaxy though,
Pretty much my own wish. I would actually love them to fit it into more of the galactic marvel universe and use styles similar to GOTG or T:R.If Disney/Marvel Studios tackles a new FF, I really hope they treat it more as an adventure story than a superhero story.
I'd be happy if they skipped most origin stories or at least show the origin in the opening credits.Pretty much my own wish. I would actually love them to fit it into more of the galactic marvel universe and use styles similar to GOTG or T:R.
If I could give one suggestion to Feige it would be to do what they did with Spider-Man, and skip the origin story, since it's really not as shocking in a world already filled with super-humans.
If they do have to do an origin story, then my other recommendation is "drag it out". What I mean by that is have them go into space, transform, and sort of get lost out there. It becomes less a "Oh hey we have more super people, great..." to a sort of Lost in Space adventure, where they are trying to come to terms with their powers in an unfamiliar galactic landscape (Ben can even use his rocky looks to make people think he is a Kronan). As they attempt to find a way to get home, a newly awakened Galactis appears, and they have to escape the planet they are on at the time before he consumes it. In the end they have to decide to head home or stop the threat from reaching Earth, and decide to sacrifice themselves to save Earth (but of course get back to Earth anyways through some other contrivance, like maybe Captain Marvel shows up, creating a more solid MCU link). I think that is preferable when it's pretty much assured the incoming X-Men will be more Earth based.
I honestly believe that a large portion of the audience for every MCU movie is not familiar with the source material, and they usually need an origin story. Some of them are kids, some of them are people who never read a comic in their life, and they need some exposition for the story to make sense.I'd be happy if they skipped most origin stories or at least show the origin in the opening credits.
Pretty much this. Spider-Man has been a huge cultural icon for decades, so we don't need to rehash his origin. F4 hasn't really had much of a media presence in the last 10+ years, and none of their movies have been blockbusters, so they might need at least a recap for most movie-goers.I honestly believe that a large portion of the audience for every MCU movie is not familiar with the source material, and they usually need an origin story. Some of them are kids, some of them are people who never read a comic in their life, and they need some exposition for the story to make sense.
It worked for The Incredible Hulk.To me, the F4 origin story was kinda the most boring part, really. I'm sure it could be summarized in a 45 second establishing montage, maybe even during the credits.
I don't know. We didn't need to watch John MacClane's marriage fall apart for half the movie in order to be invested in Die Hard.It works differently for different properties. Spider-man is so thoroughly well-known that they can skip the origin entirely and have a short conversation with a supporting character about it midway through the movie. The Incredible Hulk can do a short recap in the beginning because it was only 5 years removed from a previous film (it really is a good example of how to do a soft reboot). I would say that FF4 could do the same.
On the other hand, most of the MCU properties need an origin story for the audiences. Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, GotG, Ant-Man, Dr. Strange, Black Panther... each one of these are properties people may or may not have heard about before, but large segments of the audience will be ignorant as to how they came about. The audience needs something to tell them how they came to be, or they won't become invested in the story.
Now that the movies have more or less established super heroes as a genre, I don't know if that's really necessary.Pretty much this. Spider-Man has been a huge cultural icon for decades, so we don't need to rehash his origin. F4 hasn't really had much of a media presence in the last 10+ years, and none of their movies have been blockbusters, so they might need at least a recap for most movie-goers.
We didn't need to see his marriage fall apart because because marriage and divorce are already part of our daily culture. We needed Doctor Strange's origin because it built a new world of magic that was both alien to the viewer and the protagonist. Through him, we learned the rules, limits, etc.I don't know. We didn't need to watch John MacClane's marriage fall apart for half the movie in order to be invested in Die Hard.
I really didn't need Professor Strange's origin story, even though I'd never heard of him. He's a wizard in modern times. Got it.
Ooo, like the Huntsman?I'd be happy if they skipped most origin stories or at least show the origin in the opening credits.
Ooo, like the Huntsman?
—Patrick