[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzQAsRPJH5c:3n5mkyh0][/youtube:3n5mkyh0]
As many of you have no doubt probably seen by now if you've been connected to Xbox Live, Microsoft's new dashboard advertisements have begun appearing for Xbox 360 owners.
Rather than the standard, static advertisements you're used to seeing, these bring running commercials to your 360, in some cases complete with video and, more annoyingly, sound. You can see an example of one running in this video here.
Josh Lovison, of digital media experts the Emerging Media Lab, tells us that these new Silverlight ads won't as intrusive as you may have first feared, as they've been designed to \"fit with the rest of the interface\". So you won't be seeing pop-up ads, or replacement banners, or watermarks, or news tickers, or anything like that. You'll just be seeing ads running in the same NXE \"windows\" as you find everything else on the console's user interface.
Interestingly, Lovison also says that Microsoft's entire move to the New Xbox Experience may have been partly influenced by the desire/need for advertising, as the \"windows\" that all NXE content is displayed in, from videos to demos to Xbox Live Arcade titles, \"just so happen to be IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) standard sizes\". Meaning a Flash/Silverlight ad from a website can be dropped directly onto the 360 dashboard.
I haven't seen one of these myself yet; I'm presuming you can just navigate away from them, and aren't forced to watch them?
Here's another one for Ads.Singularity.EXE said:I'm with the Dave-sir here, I don't mind ads at all. In fact I would prefer ads over paying more for something. Also, some ads (not the one in the video per-say) are actually interesting nowadays.
The difference here is that you can't get away from the ones in the movie, but in the console if you don't want to see it you just go right past it and don't stop.Shegokigo said:Yeah, I don't mind ads for free services, but ads during something I already paid for? I already put up with this bullshit before movies, now in my games/console?
It's not that I'm anti-advertisement; I'm anti advertisement when it comes to something that I've paid good money to use already. Were it a free service, a revenue stream is logical. I understand looking for another revenue stream, but if you don't speak out when things like this bother you, you wind up with having to put up with even more crap.Singularity.EXE said:Wow people are really anti-advertisments. I mean holy shit people its a small-little video in this case that you can just scroll over. And I can totally sympathize with Microsoft wanting to try and make more money, its just the way it is.
Also, I would love it if we saw more real companies in video games, as long as they served purely cosmetic roles. A modern game taking place in a city *should* have real businesses everywhere.
No, but my TV antenna is free :tongue:quandofloo said:Do your cable television channels run advertisement free?
No, but they didn't start out showing no commercials and then decided to add them in later either. When you purchase cable tv, you know what you are getting ahead of time. It's more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials in the middle of movies.quandofloo said:Do your cable television channels run advertisement free?
It would be more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials on a separate channel if you wanted to watch them. Also, HBO already runs commercials for their other products between their normal showings in addition to the 15 minute behind the scenes features they run for current box office movies which are no more than thinly disguised commercials.General Specific said:No, but they didn't start out showing no commercials and then decided to add them in later either. When you purchase cable tv, you know what you are getting ahead of time. It's more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials in the middle of movies.quandofloo said:Do your cable television channels run advertisement free?
Well, yes, that does work better. The channel is in the middle of all the others, so you'd have to click past it, but don't have to stop and watch.quandofloo said:It would be more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials on a separate channel if you wanted to watch them.General Specific said:No, but they didn't start out showing no commercials and then decided to add them in later either. When you purchase cable tv, you know what you are getting ahead of time. It's more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials in the middle of movies.quandofloo said:Do your cable television channels run advertisement free?
DING! I'm watching Dexter for the first time On Demand and before each episode is a commercial for Nurse Jackie. And you have to fast forward to get past it.quandofloo said:It would be more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials on a separate channel if you wanted to watch them. Also, HBO already runs commercials for their other products between their normal showings in addition to the 15 minute behind the scenes features they run for current box office movies which are no more than thinly disguised commercials.General Specific said:No, but they didn't start out showing no commercials and then decided to add them in later either. When you purchase cable tv, you know what you are getting ahead of time. It's more like HBO deciding to start showing commercials in the middle of movies.quandofloo said:Do your cable television channels run advertisement free?
For some people I know yeah, it is. They can barely afford one or two games per year without counting Gold so... they have to choose: do they play the same game for years and play it online or would they rather have a new game? They end up paying for a single month when they can so it's not that bad but I dunno. Well okay, maybe it's not that bad, don't mind me.Yeah, that $59 a year is a deal breaker.
Edrondol said:DING! I'm watching Dexter for the first time On Demand and before each episode is a commercial for Nurse Jackie. And you have to fast forward to get past it.
This is nothing new, nor is it invasive. You can go right past it with almost no effort.
No, that still included ads.quandofloo said:You mean when the only communication was by smoke signal and the only history available was the oral history passed down by the tribal elders?
Don't be so smug. Those tribal communities probably lived out a more fulfilled existence than we modern folk can only dream of.quandofloo said:You mean when the only communication was by smoke signal and the only history available was the oral history passed down by the tribal elders?
If people don't see it as a problem, why would they complain about it? :bush:General Fuzzy McBitty said:See, I don't agree with any sort of, "It's not invasive, not a problem" argument that makes complainers out to be idiots.
Um, of course they will. Any business would. A good business will do focus-testing and usability testing first to see if customers respond positively, but any company that's not a non-profit will push any revenue stream as far as they can until the costs involved (whether financial costs, long-term brand equity, missed market opportunities, etc) become prohibitive.I don't like this sort of thing in the industry purely because it's a slippery slope industry. If you don't voice complaints about this sort of thing, the game companies try to see how far it can be pushed.
It does keep me from playing online with the console. Can't say that I'd play much online even if it was free though.Edrondol said:Yeah, that $59 a year is a deal breaker. :toocool:
Nah, I´ll take travelling and drinking over hunting and making 15 kids.Chazwozel said:Don't be so smug. Those tribal communities probably lived out a more fulfilled existence than we modern folk can only dream of.quandofloo said:You mean when the only communication was by smoke signal and the only history available was the oral history passed down by the tribal elders?
General Fuzzy McBitty said:See, I don't agree with any sort of, "It's not invasive, not a problem" argument that makes complainers out to be idiots.
I don't like this sort of thing in the industry purely because it's a slippery slope industry. If you don't voice complaints about this sort of thing, the game companies try to see how far it can be pushed.
Oh man, poor console fanboys... they think they play good games...Then don't buy an xbox even if you considered it and don't enjoy the best games on the market...
Sure, if they made it past the age of 8...Chazwozel said:Don't be so smug. Those tribal communities probably lived out a more fulfilled existence than we modern folk can only dream of.quandofloo said:You mean when the only communication was by smoke signal and the only history available was the oral history passed down by the tribal elders?
like all ads (for anything really) they are hoping a percentage of them WILL click on it. So consider there are millions of xbox users, the company might get 1000? 10000? view? it could worth something. (to Microsoft)TeKeo said:I don't think those ads are remotely intrusive, but I'm concerned about Microsoft's ability to sell the ad-space. If this doesn't work, they may scrap it and replace it with something a lot less palatable, like a fixed ad window in the lower left corner.
The in-house ads that they had before were click-to-play game trailers and direct response ads of the "buy now on XBLA and get 50% off game ABC" type. These are ads that require very little time to grab a response from a consumer. Even if a user was just flipping past the tabs, there's a good chance that they'll see the entire ad, and they may stop to look more closely or respond to it.
A 15 to 30 sec video/audio ad, however, actually requires users to stop and look at the ad for an extended period of time for the pay-off. If I'm an advertiser, and I know that the vast majority of users won't see more than a second of my ad, Microsoft is going to really have to lowball it to sell me the ad space.
It all comes down to the numbers of course, and maybe Microsoft has already sold the ad space to movie and TV studios to show trailers that people might actually want to see, so they believe that their actuals will match their predicted numbers.
But I'm skeptical it will work, and if it doesn't, I think there's no way MS won't try for something that's less easily dismissed.
Which is why I said it comes down to numbers. It's not whether it's worth anything to Microsoft, it's whether it's worth anything to advertisers, and the placement, nature, and implementation of the ad makes me doubtful that a lot of advertisers will find it valuable. That it seems likely that the vast majority of users won't even see the entire ad is discouraging.Chibibar said:like all ads (for anything really) they are hoping a percentage of them WILL click on it. So consider there are millions of xbox users, the company might get 1000? 10000? view? it could worth something. (to Microsoft)