Cat said:Apple is the kid that gets a few laughs with a dirty joke then moves on to yelling out ethnic slurs at the bus stop.
Does someone happen to have a link to their latest issue with Microsoft advertising?
For a company with such a strong sense of presentation, it's a bit funny how dumb they are when it comes to PR.Necronic said:Cat said:Apple is the kid that gets a few laughs with a dirty joke then moves on to yelling out ethnic slurs at the bus stop.
Does someone happen to have a link to their latest issue with Microsoft advertising?
Yup, here you go.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Apple- ... ,8268.html
Looks like they got a little butthurt
Ah, this could be interesting.TeKeo said:The rumour is that the Palm Pre essentially hacked a code loophole fooling iTunes into thinking thinking the Pre was an iPhone, and was advertising "compatibility" as a selling point.
No reason for Apple to stand for that.
Leaving aside whether this is actually the protected form of reverse-engineering (that they're selling the exploit makes it a little grey), there is nothing that legally obligates Apple to oblige Palm by keeping the exploit working.Cuyval Dar said:Wrong. This is lockout, plain and simple. Despite it being slow, glitchy, and bloated, iTunes is used by a huge number of people worldwide. This is locking out a competitor.
I doubt anything Palm did was illegal. All they did was have the Pre send an iPod product ID to iTunes when when it tried to sync.TeKeo said:Leaving aside whether this is actually the protected form of reverse-engineering (that they're selling the exploit makes it a little grey), there is nothing that legally obligates Apple to oblige Palm by keeping the exploit working.Cuyval Dar said:Wrong. This is lockout, plain and simple. Despite it being slow, glitchy, and bloated, iTunes is used by a huge number of people worldwide. This is locking out a competitor.
Even were the DoJ to get involved and force Apple to open their software up to 3rd-party development, they would probably also force Palm to scrap their exploit and buy a development license from Apple.
No, it's not illegal, but if the DoJ forces Apple to open their software to 3rd-party development, depending on how that happens, it could become actionable in a civil suit if Palm then doesn't apply for a 3rd-party development license from Apple. Just as reverse-engineering software is legal, so are anti-tamper measures.Shakey said:I doubt anything Palm did was illegal. All they did was have the Pre send an iPod product ID to iTunes when when it tried to sync.TeKeo said:Leaving aside whether this is actually the protected form of reverse-engineering (that they're selling the exploit makes it a little grey), there is nothing that legally obligates Apple to oblige Palm by keeping the exploit working.Cuyval Dar said:Wrong. This is lockout, plain and simple. Despite it being slow, glitchy, and bloated, iTunes is used by a huge number of people worldwide. This is locking out a competitor.
Even were the DoJ to get involved and force Apple to open their software up to 3rd-party development, they would probably also force Palm to scrap their exploit and buy a development license from Apple.
Their products are reliable, its just the company is not ethical.Icarus said:Apple are cunts for a big number of reasons - the fact that they actively prevent Mac OS X from being used on a PC (lawsuits) just goes to show they are. Microsoft may not be much better, but MS has had that bad reputation for over a decade and Apple is wrongful perceived as being more reliable when, in fact, they're WORSE than Microsoft.
There is no 3rd party development to be done here though. It's just letting other media players sync with iTunes. iTunes specifically looks for only apple products and will not sync with anything else. If they open that up, it's done. Palm doesn't have to do anything and there is no reason for Apple to license anything. The only thing they may have to think about licensing is their DRM, which isn't going to happen.TeKeo said:No, it's not illegal, but if the DoJ forces Apple to open their software to 3rd-party development, depending on how that happens, it could become actionable in a civil suit if Palm then doesn't apply for a 3rd-party development license from Apple. Just as reverse-engineering software is legal, so are anti-tamper measures.
JCM said:Their products are reliable, its just the company is not ethical.Icarus said:Apple are ham sandwich for a big number of reasons - the fact that they actively prevent Mac OS X from being used on a PC (lawsuits) just goes to show they are. Microsoft may not be much better, but MS has had that bad reputation for over a decade and Apple is wrongful perceived as being more reliable when, in fact, they're WORSE than Microsoft.
Besides all the money they could make if the DoJ accepts a licensing solution?Shakey said:If they open that up, it's done. Palm doesn't have to do anything and there is no reason for Apple to license anything.
Their software is actually not that reliable and still has major compatibility issues. In our office, we've had more Mac software issues than on our PC. Example:JCM said:Their products are reliable, its just the company is not ethical.Icarus said:Apple are ham sandwich for a big number of reasons - the fact that they actively prevent Mac OS X from being used on a PC (lawsuits) just goes to show they are. Microsoft may not be much better, but MS has had that bad reputation for over a decade and Apple is wrongful perceived as being more reliable when, in fact, they're WORSE than Microsoft.
Yeah that's very true. Anyone who has used Quicktime in the early 90's when it used to run in Windows 3.1 may remember the TONS of issues.Necronic said:JCM said:Their products are reliable, its just the company is not ethical.Icarus said:Apple are ham sandwich for a big number of reasons - the fact that they actively prevent Mac OS X from being used on a PC (lawsuits) just goes to show they are. Microsoft may not be much better, but MS has had that bad reputation for over a decade and Apple is wrongful perceived as being more reliable when, in fact, they're WORSE than Microsoft.
I used to think this, and in certain circumstances (like apple software on apple hardware) their products are really reliable. However, whenever they have to deal with another company, they sometimes have pretty bad reliability issues. Be it iTunes or Quicktime on a windows PC (massive memory leaks) or Apps for my iPhone (all sorts of freezing issues).
Couldn't agree more, both in the micro and the macro senses of "compatibility." For example, so many times on the WoW forums for Mac support (which is probably the best computer-related customer support I've ever gotten), I see people asking about this bug or that feature and the reply is basically that Apple doesn't have their stuff together. Couched much more diplomatically than that, of course. I love my Mac goodies as well but Apple is definitely in some kind of ivory tower where people don't use their products in the real world.Necronic said:One of my big beefs with their attitude on high quality equipment is compatibility. Microsoft/windows doesn't do nearly as good as an apple when apple gets top down control over all the parts associated, but as soon as apple is held to the same standard Microsoft (ie needs to play well with others) Apple drops the ball.
Necronic said:Cat said:Apple is the kid that gets a few laughs with a dirty joke then moves on to yelling out ethnic slurs at the bus stop.
Does someone happen to have a link to their latest issue with Microsoft advertising?
Yup, here you go.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Apple- ... ,8268.html
Looks like they got a little butthurt
JCM said:Their products are reliable, its just the company is not ethical.Icarus said:Apple are ham sandwich for a big number of reasons - the fact that they actively prevent Mac OS X from being used on a PC (lawsuits) just goes to show they are. Microsoft may not be much better, but MS has had that bad reputation for over a decade and Apple is wrongful perceived as being more reliable when, in fact, they're WORSE than Microsoft.
But you can't pick the keyboard when you buy an iMac. Apple forces you to buy it along with the mouse and its software whenever you buy one of their computers so you can bet you paid close to $80 in the first place when you originally bought it. My point was that the damn things are hugely expensive yet can't even be properly opened without special tools.Covar said:spending $80 on an apple keyboard as a replacement instead of buying a cheap third party? your IT dept sounds like idiots.
I've seen the spinning apple wheel of deathIcarus said:But you can't pick the keyboard when you buy an iMac. Apple forces you to buy it along with the mouse and its software whenever you buy one of their computers so you can bet you paid close to $80 in the first place when you originally bought it. My point was that the damn things are hugely expensive yet can't even be properly opened without special tools.Covar said:spending $80 on an apple keyboard as a replacement instead of buying a cheap third party? your IT dept sounds like idiots.
Today, I had another "great" discussion with Mac-fanatics. They said I was talking bullshit when I said that my Vista workstation hasn't been restarted in three months. I showed them proof, they said it was not true. It can't be because Vista would crash long before that they said. I told them Vista, on proper hardware (i.e. not cheap crap with poor drivers), Vista is at least as stable as Mac OS X and can easily run for months without any need for reboot. My father's PC, get this, hasn't been restarted in half a year and then it was due to a thunder storm forcing him to unplug it. AND he has a $450 PC too! Cheap as * but decent hardware. See, it's crap like this that makes me dislike a lot of Mac users - they don't understand how it works. They see a family member running a 5 year old PC and then see how Vista struggles on the outdated PC that cost next to nothing even when they bought it. Then they go all arrogant and think their Mac, which cost 5 times as much, is better. I'm sorry if I take price/quality balance into account.
Palm has released webOS 1.1, which, along with offering more robust EAS support for business users, re-enables Palm media sync,” said company spokesperson Lynn Fox. “Palm believes that openness and interoperability offer better experiences for users by allowing them the freedom to use the content they own without interference across devices and services, so on behalf of consumers, we have notified the USB Implementers Forum [USB-IF] of what we believe is improper use of the Vendor ID number by another member.