As much as I hate to say anything negative about any... any... a... BAHAHA sorry couldn't keep that up.
This is a mediocre attempt to create a moving comic book of sorts. The voice acting is pretty bad (especially Emma Frost, ugh), and it's based on John Cassaday's weird-ass interpretation of the X-Men. For Joss Whedon, there's relatively few rambling pop-culture dialogue session. Mostly I just find it stale and derivative. I haven't read X-Men heavily since the 90s, and the thing is it's the same. Hasn't the comic changed at all since then? Same problems, same plots. Snooze. The art is nice (interpretation notwithstanding), but the 3-D mapping they used to make things move is creepy and unsettling. With a better story and better voice work I could get around it. Despite all that, it's worth a watch. The score is also derivative but suitable. Overall...maybe a 2.5/5 or a "fair" rating.
#2
ThatNickGuy
Moving comics suck and honestly, just feel lazy to me.
Hey don't get me wrong I loved Astonishing X-men, especially when you compare it to the other shit that was going on in X-men at the time. I just hate motion comics.
#9
Ravenpoe
What the hell is a motion comic? What differentiates a moving comic and actual animation?
I'm on episode 2. Man the "3-D motion" is weeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiirding me out. I will say this Fade, what exactly is odd about John Cassaday's version of the X-Men? They look pretty normal to me?
I'm on episode 2. Man the "3-D motion" is weeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiirding me out. I will say this Fade, what exactly is odd about John Cassaday's version of the X-Men? They look pretty normal to me?