Well, they appoint their own "pope", then they force all those who wish to worship according to the catholic faith to worship under their pope's guidance. They then do the same thing with all other religions of any consequence, and the effect is the same as stamping out religion - they will then control their people both politically and religiously, and anyone that objects are called dissidents and jailed.
But then, England did the same in it's own time, and Luther became a watershed for another pulling away from the Catholic faith. Honestly China is not doing anything new - it's just that they don't recognize religion as a valid choice - and as communists that's a valid point of view. It's the reason the US added "Under God" to the pledge of allegiance, to separate us from "godless communists."
If I understand correctly, from their perspective:
- God doesn't exist
- People run the churches and ultimately decide how their followers "worship"
- Sometimes their decisions teach people principles and values that are at odds with the nation's goals
- Some people need religious structures and organizations to be productive and happy
Therefore taking control of religious institutions makes the most sense.
Keep in mind that the whole concept of religious freedom is a relatively new development in human history.
---------- Post added at 03:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:34 PM ----------
Not that I support their position - I believe everyone should have the freedom to choose their own faith. But it's not shocking that they are pursuing this route. Whether they are successful will depend completely on the people in China, and honestly I have no idea how they'll react. Which is stronger - their faith in their county and nation, or their faith in their church? Do they view the pope as merely a figurehead and CEO of a religious organization, or as the leader of Christ's church on the earth as chosen by God?
It will be interesting to see how this plays out over time. It's interesting to see events like this in a contemporary viewpoint, whereas typically we read about such things in history books - books that the winner of any given conflict wrote.