whoever told you that is dumb as hellLe Quack said:i herd it sux
Shhh, they might buy something original!! :slywink:Shannow said:It is just an overmilked IP and thus, not worth any time.
SPOILER: if you think something is original you just haven't been exposed to it's "inspiration"! :tongue:JCM said:Shhh, they might buy something original!! :slywink:Shannow said:It is just an overmilked IP and thus, not worth any time.
Sorry, Im to busy watching 10 different Inspector gadget tv shows that are shown the same time and might happen to continue onto another, and also "Detective comics", where yet another writer is hired to milk out the Inspector gadget name, while raving how awesome Frank Miller's take on gadget is, but sadly due to Dr. Claw ripping through the frabric of time that never happened.@Li3n said:SPOILER: if you think something is original you just haven't been exposed to it's "inspiration"! :tongue:JCM said:Shhh, they might buy something original!! :slywink:Shannow said:It is just an overmilked IP and thus, not worth any time.
Yeah, again the sad pathetic trying to get the few 1-2% of manga that dont end, in a market where the top 25 manga are NEW IP that have been around for 10 year max, to defend 10 fucking titles of the same 70-year old IP that is in one´s Jammies.@Li3n said:Gundam series! A few rare manga that dont end and still together are less than the number of comics with wolverine in them!!!
You Batman nerds have to be more specific, which of the monthly BS-@Li3n said:
Be more specific, are you talking about Original in the Origivengers, Dark Originvengers, the Origin solo comic, or origin:Origins, or the Original War maxi-series and spin-offs, where the originals must choose whether they want to reveal theyre fake crap or join Captain piracy, or the Original classified, where we discover his sidekick Authentic isnt dead but was working as a hooker and his dead girlfriend Creativity actyally was sleeping with his enemy, Copyright Lawyer?Dorko said:original.
Why not? Batwoman is practically a brand new character that almost no one has done anything with. Dick Grayson and Damien Wayne getting used to being the new Batman and Robin has MORE than enough material for the three books it takes up. Red Robin, AKA Tim Drake, is off over in Europe so trying to cram his story into one of the above would be page consuming and unsatisfying. And Gotham City Sirens is using three popular villainesses in their own stories, not as the bad guys but as the protagonists. Finally, some people don't like the idea of a new Batman. So they can enjoy Batman Confidential and Batman/Superman for not-strictly continuity stories starring Bruce Wayne. Need? Nope. We don't need ANY comic books. They're entertainment. Is there more than enough new stories to fill each and everyone one of these monthly books? Hell yes.You dont need 10 fucking bat-books and spin-offs a month.
Which rightness?Dorko said:Rightness.
Are you actually telling me we need ten fucking titles and crossovers for stories that in the 80s, could be contained in one monthly or bi-monthly comic, and that in EVERY DAMN MEDIA can be contained in that same title/show/comic/manga/episode.Dorko said:Why not?
Because they don't.JCM said:Why must american comics, and only american comics, require ten monthly titles-crossovers-spinoffs to tell the story where every other media does fine with just one or two?
how dare you try to discuss something. on a discussion forum! reallywhat happened to this thread i just wanted to talk about how awesome the first issue of Greg Rucka's run on Detective Comics was
whatGurpel said:how dare you try to discuss something. on a discussion forum! really
[image macro]Wikipedia said:Fade is always right.
In 103% of all interviewees interviewed in the RAS (Really Accurate Study), 100% completely agreed that fade is always right. And handsome and awesome to boot. Also, a bunch of left wing and right wing pundits, 90% of whom are unheard of bloggers also agree that fade is right. All the time.
Thank you. I had ignored that thread, but now at least see the basis and explanation for JCM's seemingly inane ranting...Shannow said:Check the X-men thread. It carried into here.
Of course we need ten fucking Harry Potter books a year. :smug:Dorko said:We need TEN Harry Potter books at the same time.
Why not? Dobby is practically a brand new character that almost no one has done anything with. Ron Weasley and Bumbledore getting used to the situation have MORE than enough material for the three books it takes up. Snape, AKA Bumbledore´s killer, has so much background that trying to cram his story into one of the above would be page consuming and unsatisfying. And The Hogwart´s sirens is using three popular Slytherin students in their own stories, not as the bad guys but as the protagonists. Finally, some people don't like the idea of an older teen Harry Potter. So they can enjoy Hogwart´s Confidential and Harry/Snape for not-strictly continuity stories starring our boy Wizard.
Need? Nope. We don't need ANY books. They're entertainment. Is there more than enough new stories to fill each and everyone one of these yearly books? Hell yes.
Funnily, until the 80s, 2 comics were more than enough for any superhero and supporting cast, with 1 being normal.Sure....after 75+ years, Superman and Batman's stories have remained relatively unchanged...but that doesn't mean that, regardless of the similarities from arc to arc, "the same old story" can't be enjoyed with it's re-telling/new twists...
I cant say much for the past year and "New Batman" storyline, as I gave up on comcis after Civil War, but I must agree on the previous year.Cat said:May check out later but I can agree with some of JCM's issues with American comics, though this is the wrong thread for it.
Batman Comics especially have a ridiculous history with crossovers. It was very common to have the next part of almost every story arc to be told in yet another Detective Batman: Gotham Legends of the Dark Bat Knights and Friends spin-off. I could have sworn DC said they would end the extra Bat series after RIP but why would they?
1) Where the FUCK was this live and let live attitude this morning when you were calling people like me dumbfucks?! 2) You don't HAVE to read ALL the series to keep up with, to use the example that started this, Batman? Batwoman isn't even really a Batman supporting character! I'm not even entirely certain that she's met any member of the Bat-Family but Nightwing. And to keep up with Dick and Damien as the Dynmaic Duo, pick any one of the three core bat titles. Each has it's own, unique unto itself story. That's all you need.JCM said:On the opinion that 10 monthly comics are needed, I agree to disagree, I grew up during the best years of american comics, and never needed 10 books to understand what was going on with a character and his supporting cast. If you enjoy it, fine with me.
Very badly, I want to contribute to the original discussion that was supposed to go on in here. Unfortunately...I haven't read the book in question. However, I will see if I can read it, now that you've mentioned it.Kissinger said:what the fuck is anyone talking about i don't even know
It does rock. Kissinger is right on the money.Chronos[Ha-G said:]Very badly, I want to contribute to the original discussion that was supposed to go on in here. Unfortunately...I haven't read the book in question. However, I will see if I can read it, now that you've mentioned it.Kissinger said:what the smurf is anyone talking about i don't even know
Again, every damn fucking industry in the world doesnt need ten titles for one character and his supporting cast.Dorko said:Novel Series =/= Comic book series.
Where would I survive if publishers had to go back to newstands, instead of pretending an investor market still exists in comic stores that cant even get buy sellling just comics.
Which make up for more than 90% of total sales of your two top companies, which through barely-legal monopoly and killing off distributors kind to indepedents with an exclusive contract with Diamond.Additionally, you are applying a phenomenon that applies to a relative minority of characters published on a monthly basis.
Thank goodness it isn't Batman's mind in there, if it were the Black Lanterns would have a shot. You know, how Batman can defeat anything with enough prep time.Dorko said:Actually, Bruce Wayne is still "dead" as far as everyone is concerned. That's long time Green Lantern villain Black Hand in that picture.
Which, after reading the first few issues, I wholeheartedly approve. THIS is how you make big changes to the status quo. It's so well written and natural that I wish it could last.Dorko said:Dick Grayson has become the new Batman. And Damien, Bruce and Talia Al Gul's all knowing punk kid is Robin.
Oh sweet lord I agree. Wholeheartedly. I don't mind Bruce Wayne returning from the stone age, but give him Detective Comics and have him travel the world with Talia fighting the League of Assassins and the Club of Villains and whatever. Leave Dick Grayson alooone!Aisaku said:Which, after reading the first few issues, I wholeheartedly approve. THIS is how you make big changes to the status quo. It's so well written and natural that I wish it could last.Dorko said:* Grayson has become the new Batman. And Damien, Bruce and Talia Al Gul's all knowing punk kid is Robin.
Oooooo, not a bad idea sir. It would result in more fan boy outrage, but could lead to some good stories. Maybe make Vandal Savage and Ra's Al Ghul his recurring foes throughout time. Maybe a guest app in Booster Gold telling Booster that he wasn't to see this through himself.@Li3n said:Or better, keep Bruce jumping through time Quantum Leap style (but with each life lasting a while) and having adventures that cement the DCU's history and the fact that no matter how bad it gets Bruce never quits... there's at least 10 years worth of content there. Prehistoric Bats -> Victorian Caped Crusader.
I get the same vibe about Rene Montoya's Question (did you hear she's a lesbian?) I was doing a little research on Vic's Question and heard he died of cancer. At least in the 80's he was killed by a pellet gun, but he got better.Covar said:I enjoy the new batman and robin. HATE the art (this has been discussed), love the story. glad Morrison is back to writing a coherent story rather than something that made me feel I was missing entire pages between panels.
Haven't read Detective comics yet. Might try it because of Rucka, but I really hated the Batwoman character in 52. She was way overhyped (did you know she's a lesbian?), a bit of a mary sue (did you know she's a lesbian?) being a character plopped down into the universe who is already as rich if not richer that Bruce Wayne, So hot that Nightwing instantly forgot about his fiance (did you know she's a lesbian?), and is just as skilled as a member of the Bat-family despite the years of training and experience that they have (did you know she's a lesbian?). The worst part is getting called a bigot when you try and point out the characters absurdity.
I'm told she gets better after 52 and actually starts becoming a character, and with the Question backup its worth reading at least the first couple of issues.
Man, I can't believe anyone could diss Quitely's art. The man is a God damn master.Covar said:I enjoy the new batman and robin. HATE the art (this has been discussed), love the story. glad Morrison is back to writing a coherent story rather than something that made me feel I was missing entire pages between panels.
Haven't read Detective comics yet. Might try it because of Rucka, but I really hated the Batwoman character in 52. She was way overhyped (did you know she's a lesbian?), a bit of a mary sue (did you know she's a lesbian?) being a character plopped down into the universe who is already as rich if not richer that Bruce Wayne, So hot that Nightwing instantly forgot about his fiance (did you know she's a lesbian?), and is just as skilled as a member of the Bat-family despite the years of training and experience that they have (did you know she's a lesbian?). The worst part is getting called a bigot when you try and point out the characters absurdity.
I'm told she gets better after 52 and actually starts becoming a character, and with the Question backup its worth reading at least the first couple of issues.
Montoya gets more of a pass for me because she actually has more of a history as a character.sixpackshaker said:I get the same vibe about Rene Montoya's Question (did you hear she's a lesbian?) I was doing a little research on Vic's Question and heard he died of cancer. At least in the 80's he was killed by a pellet gun, but he got better.Covar said:I enjoy the new batman and robin. HATE the art (this has been discussed), love the story. glad Morrison is back to writing a coherent story rather than something that made me feel I was missing entire pages between panels.
Haven't read Detective comics yet. Might try it because of Rucka, but I really hated the Batwoman character in 52. She was way overhyped (did you know she's a lesbian?), a bit of a mary sue (did you know she's a lesbian?) being a character plopped down into the universe who is already as rich if not richer that Bruce Wayne, So hot that Nightwing instantly forgot about his fiance (did you know she's a lesbian?), and is just as skilled as a member of the Bat-family despite the years of training and experience that they have (did you know she's a lesbian?). The worst part is getting called a bigot when you try and point out the characters absurdity.
I'm told she gets better after 52 and actually starts becoming a character, and with the Question backup its worth reading at least the first couple of issues.
Then I heard Detective Montoya got the job, I though great! to have a Latina as a tough as nails crime fighter. I really liked the character in Batman the Animated Series. Then they write her to be a Lesbian. That just seems to be the go to position for many of the new female characters over the past few years...
I'd like to see a Lt. Gordon book done with the BA version of Gordon from Batman Year One.ThatNickGuy said:EVERY Gotham book needs more Bullock.
You know what would be awesome? A regular Bullock series, done by Darwyn Cooke. Imagine him doing Bullock in his detective kind of style of art like he did with Slam Bradley.
...I just want Darwyn Cooke to do more.
This.Frankie said:Man, I can't believe anyone could diss Quitely's art. The man is a God damn master.
JCM said:This.Frankie said:Man, I can't believe anyone could diss Quitely's art. The man is a God damn master.
I dunno, when I was younger I hated Quitly's artwork. The.....rough lines turned me off. Even now, it takes two pages or so for me to get over that and re-find the appreciation.Shannow said:Agreed.JCM said:This.Frankie said:Man, I can't believe anyone could diss Quitely's art. The man is a God damn master.
Have you heard about the Parker graphic novels he's doing? That stuff looks absolutely amazing. [strike:1xg9w0gb]I'm not sure when the first one comes out.[/strike:1xg9w0gb] Wait, I think it might be out now!ThatNickGuy said:EVERY Gotham book needs more Bullock.
You know what would be awesome? A regular Bullock series, done by Darwyn Cooke. Imagine him doing Bullock in his detective kind of style of art like he did with Slam Bradley.
...I just want Darwyn Cooke to do more.
Just want to add. if the man wasn't slow as molasses I think he would make a great layouts guy.Me in the Hey nerd said:To clarify my stance on Quitely (after all i should provide more than just "its ugly"). I find his art to look "muddy" if that makes any sense. I think this stems from his inability to draw a steady line. I find the tiny swiggly lines kills any sense of texture in his art. On top of this I've yet to see him draw any person that would be a 5 or higher If I ran into them on the street. He made Emma Frost and Jean Grey look like ugly old hags when he was on New X-men. Which is actually a good lead in to my biggest issue with Quitely; his speed. I'm not saying he should be as fast an artist as Jack Kirby was, or even as fast as Mark Bagley (both of whom IMO put out better quality art), but the man can't even come close to a monthly schedule and yet continuously gets himself put on "monthly" titles.
JCM said:Again, every damn fucking industry in the world doesnt need ten titles for one character and his supporting cast.
It's been awesome but Jesus Christ, it's taken FOREVER for it to come out.Covar said:legion of three worlds (which has been all kinds of awesome).
When I saw that cover I immediately thought that robin looked like alfred e neuman. Fortunately the rest of the comic doesn't have this problem. Why did DC let this slip? I have no idea.fade said:Quitely is hit or miss. Sometimes his characters are nicely realistic with fat rolls in realistic places. Sometimes Robin looks like a monkey. With Robin there, he failed that lesson about age and number of lines on the face. His Lois Lane has eyes on her forehead. Most of his faces have that \"squished down\" quality about them. When he's good he's good. But his lack of anatomy and over hatching reminds me incredibly strongly of one Rob Liefield.
:bush:tegid said:Maaan when we fanboy idiots defend DC whoring 10 bat titles and Marvel shoving wolverine in another 10 this much you start to make no sense, you know?JCM said:Again, every damn fucking industry in the world doesnt need ten titles for one character and his supporting cast.
How many fucking bat appearances, and bat-books do you have a month? Talk about fanservice to fanboys.tegid said:First of all: what character has ten titles going on? No, wait. 5 titles? none? Maybe a couple (Superman?)?
So, the usual now is 2-3 instead of 1-2. Is that such a big deal??
See how laughable it is when I apply the comicbook guy´s arguement to any established brand?Also, in the specific case of Potter your rant makes even less sense: The only proper Potter titles are Harry Potter and Batman Potter and Snape, which is not exaggerated at all. Old Bumbledore is a spin off, and yes it has something to do with Potter, but well... Okay, I'll let this one go, maybe it is indeed unnecessary (but the story is pretty different to what's going on in the other titles, so I don't see why it should be so bad... it's all right if it ends up being a short series). And in the case of Magic comics... Man! It doesn't have anything to do with the Potter-family other to the name!! The character and story come from the issues of Harry potter and not any bat title.
-- Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:36 am --"Davinci crisis"?
Robert Langdon from Reality-5 has to discover a way to stop Robert Langdon Prime from killing Sherlock Holmes, Passepartout´s clone, and Hercule Poirot, who returned to life after Dark Miss Marple ripped across the dimensional pages of detective reality. (All its effects so intelligently spread accross all "Davinci Crisis tie-ins; Detective League, Mike Hammer, Mike Hammer Corps, Langdon and Jesus girl, Langdon Man of symbols, Sam Spade, P.I. comics, the New Hardy Boys and the Hardy Boys:Classified).
I heard it has 5 variant covers, and if you buy them all and put them upside down side-by-side, it´ll show a mysterious figure in the background who seems to be NancyJr Dakkar, the daughter of Nancy Drew and Captain Nemo, who was killed by Langdon and Gandalf.
Dont forget, its being written by that new hot teen writer Stephenie Meyer, with art by Harry Potter´s own Mary GrandPré, who now have signed on to head the Detective League books and the Dr Jekyll vs Marley special.
He´s good at posing Spiderman and and twsiting bodies, but somehow his faces seem they are drawn by an intern.Frankie said:See, now I'm the opposite with Bagely. I fucking hate Bagely's art. I couldn't stand Ultimate Spider-Man mostly because of him.
Bowielee said:Can we ban JCM from any comics discussion. He takes any simple conversation we have about comics and twists it into his own personal vendetta against american comics.
Which one?Shegokigo said:JCM?
Guess youre new here, Im as active as anyone in comics, heck I was reading them while you were still pooping in your diapers, but the truth is that the direct market is 90%old IPs and the same heroes are the only way they can survive.Bowielee said:
Bohooo JCM comics discussion is making fun of us.
You forgot All Star Harry Potter, shadow of the wand, Wizard stories, Pottergirl, Hogwarts syrens and that crossover with Twilight.some idiot who cant read sales figures and see that only american comics survive mainly on old IP said:And he's right. We don't need separate books for Batwoman, Red Robin, and Batman. It doesn't matter that their stories barely intersect at all...they all share a setting! And why the fuck couldn't that hack J.K. Rowling fit the \"Beedle The Bard\" story into the normal Harry Potter books?
Yes, I was too busy smoking old Liefeld comics to notice that 90% of books sold are new IP, while the opposite is hapening in comics.
-:smug:interview with Denny ONeil said:http://www.comicsbulletin.com/features/96718680087355.htm
LDI: The number of Bat-books available to readers has skyrocketed in the past decade. At present, I believe we stand at twelve monthlies (including the two animated-style titles), with a Harley Quinn title on the horizon. With prices substantially increasing in the past five years alone, I know of several readers who've had to drop certain titles, merely because they can't afford to keep up with them anymore. Is the market now oversaturated with Bat-related tales? Can too many titles be a bad thing for both the consumer and DC?
DO’N: When people stop buying the Battitles, we'll know there are too many. Sure, I worry about saturating the market, but there are no signs that we have, yet. Two words: X-Men
yeah, the first time it was funny.Shannow said:JCM is hilarious.
1)BS. Harry Potter and Twilight sales show that teenagers may read, and if you havent seen sales figures posted, Book, Manga, French BD and Manhua sales are doing just fine. Even american graphic novels sales are increasing. Its just the US direct comic (aka mostly superhero from big two) that is shrinking.Dorko said:You ever stop to think that maybe, just maybe, there a shit ton of cultural factors causing the shrinking of the comic book industry? I can think of three major ones:
1) Kids today, generally, don't like to read. They pretty much learn to read...then only do it when forced.
2) The vast majority of comic books today (and for the past 20-30 years) are geared at adult audiences. Which leads us to...
3) Comic books are considered by a VAST majority of adults to be "kid stuff" or stuff for nerds only. The ticket sales of films like Iron Man and The Dark Knight show that these "old IPs" that "only manbabys care about" can still draw millions of people to them...just not the comic book.
Not Batman´s , but Dc and Marvel.Dorko said:But it's not because there are too many Batman comics published per month.
PST, you're the one who derailed the thread, assmaster.JCM said:Lets just hope the conversation gets back to Quitely´s art, instead of the comic book nerds screaming in the face of a shrinking industry that one MUST have a Bat spinoff book, and round and round we´ll go as I invent spinoffs for every other media and comic industry that *GASP!* gets tens of millions of sales because they can do something other than yet another batbook.
High five!JCM said:Oh, and Quitely rocks.
Or the flowchart needed to understand the Discworld books. Seriously, someone posted an actual flowchart once and just looking at it scared me enough to never want to check them out.figmentPez said:Someone should write a novel where Robert Heinlein's characters all cross-over with each other, and then visit the land of Oz... Oh wait, Heinlein already did.
Or maybe kill off a famous literary character, and then bring him back after the fans demand that more novels be written... Oh, wait, that happened to Sherlock Holmes.
We'll also not mention the numerous cross-overs between the Hardy Boys and Tom Swift, or the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
Issac Asimov had his Robot novels cross-over with his Foundation novels, if I'm not mistaken.
Some of these comic cliches you think literature is immune to are more common than you seem to think.
I hate people with flowcharts... they keep ruining everybody's fun with data!ThatNickGuy said:Or the flowchart needed to understand the Discworld books. Seriously, someone posted an actual flowchart once and just looking at it scared me enough to never want to check them out.figmentPez said:Someone should write a novel where Robert Heinlein's characters all cross-over with each other, and then visit the land of Oz... Oh wait, Heinlein already did.
Or maybe kill off a famous literary character, and then bring him back after the fans demand that more novels be written... Oh, wait, that happened to Sherlock Holmes.
We'll also not mention the numerous cross-overs between the Hardy Boys and Tom Swift, or the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
Issac Asimov had his Robot novels cross-over with his Foundation novels, if I'm not mistaken.
Some of these comic cliches you think literature is immune to are more common than you seem to think.
Except as was said like fifty times in the thread, you don't need the flowchart and really can read them in any order. The books are still very enjoyable on their own.ThatNickGuy said:Or the flowchart needed to understand the Discworld books. Seriously, someone posted an actual flowchart once and just looking at it scared me enough to never want to check them out.figmentPez said:Someone should write a novel where Robert Heinlein's characters all cross-over with each other, and then visit the land of Oz... Oh wait, Heinlein already did.
Or maybe kill off a famous literary character, and then bring him back after the fans demand that more novels be written... Oh, wait, that happened to Sherlock Holmes.
We'll also not mention the numerous cross-overs between the Hardy Boys and Tom Swift, or the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
Issac Asimov had his Robot novels cross-over with his Foundation novels, if I'm not mistaken.
Some of these comic cliches you think literature is immune to are more common than you seem to think.
Yeah, I forgot that in the 2000s even Marvel and DC couldnt keep track of continuity, and the use of referance to last encounters and that little caption below showing the issue of that encounter was abolished.CynicismKills said:Except as was said like fifty times in the thread, you don't need the flowchart and really can read them in any order. The books are still very enjoyable on their own.ThatNickGuy said:Or the flowchart needed to understand the Discworld books. Seriously, someone posted an actual flowchart once and just looking at it scared me enough to never want to check them out.figmentPez said:Someone should write a novel where Robert Heinlein's characters all cross-over with each other, and then visit the land of Oz... Oh wait, Heinlein already did.
Or maybe kill off a famous literary character, and then bring him back after the fans demand that more novels be written... Oh, wait, that happened to Sherlock Holmes.
We'll also not mention the numerous cross-overs between the Hardy Boys and Tom Swift, or the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
Issac Asimov had his Robot novels cross-over with his Foundation novels, if I'm not mistaken.
Some of these comic cliches you think literature is immune to are more common than you seem to think.
WTF? What has Marvel to do with the fucking DISCWORLD which isn't at all complicated to follow?! Especially since the books are mostly independent and can be enjoyed on their own...JCM said:Yeah, I forgot that in the 2000s even Marvel and DC couldnt keep track of continuity, and the use of referance to last encounters and that little caption below showing the issue of that encounter was abolished.CynicismKills said:Except as was said like fifty times in the thread, you don't need the flowchart and really can read them in any order. The books are still very enjoyable on their own.ThatNickGuy said:Or the flowchart needed to understand the Discworld books. Seriously, someone posted an actual flowchart once and just looking at it scared me enough to never want to check them out.figmentPez said:Someone should write a novel where Robert Heinlein's characters all cross-over with each other, and then visit the land of Oz... Oh wait, Heinlein already did.
Or maybe kill off a famous literary character, and then bring him back after the fans demand that more novels be written... Oh, wait, that happened to Sherlock Holmes.
We'll also not mention the numerous cross-overs between the Hardy Boys and Tom Swift, or the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew.
Issac Asimov had his Robot novels cross-over with his Foundation novels, if I'm not mistaken.
Some of these comic cliches you think literature is immune to are more common than you seem to think.
After all, with 9 spin-offs, one must be an idiot if he expects any continuity.
Resistance is futile. All threads shall be assimilated to feed JCM's dislike of american comic books.tegid said:WTF? What has Marvel to do with the smurfing DISCWORLD which isn't at all complicated to follow?! Especially since the books are mostly independent and can be enjoyed on their own...
Wait, I'll save you the work:
NERDRAAAAAAAAAAAAGE
(This way you don't need to change my post in quotes, just quote the part you are interested in!)
Also, yeah, flowcharts should be abolished. Most times they actually make things more complicated rather than simplifying them.
Only when the comic fans cant see reality, that their purchasing the same tired IP is basically what turned the monthly comic into THE ONLY media industry that depends 90% on old IP.Bowielee said:Resistance is futile. All threads shall be assimilated to feed JCM's dislike of american comic book shops and kids who didnt grow up.
Which one?tegid said:NERDRAAAAAAAAAAAAGE
Man, one thing I have to give Alan Moore, he hits the usage of this word square on the head.JCM said:Bowielee said:graphic novel