Fired Infinity Ward execs sue Activision

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Alucard

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6252851.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;1
By Tom Magrino, GameSpotPosted Mar 4, 2010 10:04 am PT[UPDATE] Jason West, Vince Zampella charge Call of Duty publisher with breach of contract, wrongful termination; seek unpaid royalties, control of Modern Warfare-branded games; Activision calls claims "meritless."

When Activision fired Infinity Ward president Jason West and CEO Vince Zampella on Monday, the Call of Duty publisher mentioned its expectation of litigation in a Securities and Exchage Commission filing. It's unsurprising, then, that Los Angeles-based legal firm O'Melveny & Myers announced today that it has filed suit against Activision on behalf of the two executives, seeking unpaid royalties as well as "the contractual rights Activision granted to West and Zampella to control Modern Warfare-branded games."
According to Activision, Zampella's and West were booted following "an internal human resources inquiry into breaches of contract and insubordination." In a statement released today, the two Infinity Ward executives claim they were fired "weeks before they were to be paid substantial royalty payments as part of their existing contracts for Modern Warfare 2."

"Activision has refused to honor the terms of its agreements and is intentionally flouting the fundamental public policy of this state [California] that employers must pay their employees what they have rightfully earned," attorney Robert Schwartz said in a statement. "Instead of thanking, lauding, or just plain paying Jason and Vince for giving Activision the most successful entertainment product ever offered to the public, last month Activision hired lawyers to conduct a pretextual 'investigation' into unstated and unsubstantiated charges of 'insubordination' and 'breach of fiduciary duty,' which then became the grounds for their termination on Monday, March 1."

West went on to note that he and Zampella were "shocked" after being informed that they had been terminated. "We poured our heart and soul into that company, building not only a world class development studio, but assembling a team we've been proud to work with for nearly a decade," he said. "We think the work we've done speaks for itself." Zampella continued: "After all we have given to Activision, we shouldn't have to sue to get paid."

Claims in the suit include those for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, and declaratory relief. Activision had not responded to a request for comment as of press time.

Released in 2009 to critical acclaim, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 brought in $550 million for Activision within its first week of availability and $1 billion within two months. According to Zampella and West's suit, the Call of Duty franchise has brought in $3 billion since 2003--the same year Activision acquired Infinity Ward.

Following the Infinity Ward executives' dismissal, Activision announced a massive expansion to the Call of Duty franchise. Beyond the previously indicated Treyarch-developed Call of Duty title due later this year, Activision also plans to release an action adventure spin-off developed by Sledgehammer Games and an Asia-targeted massively multiplayer online installment, neither of which have a confirmed release date. In 2011, Activision plans to release yet one more Call of Duty-branded game, which is in development at an unnamed studio.

[UPDATE] Activision has since responded to West and Zampella's lawsuit, and as could be expected, the publisher believes the game designer's case is without grounds. Activision also made a point to affirm its claim of ownership to the Call of Duty franchise.

"Activision is disappointed that Mr. Zampella and Mr. West have chosen to file a lawsuit, and believes their claims are meritless," the publisher said in a statement. "Over eight years, Activision shareholders provided these executives with the capital they needed to start Infinity Ward, as well as the financial support, resources and creative independence that helped them flourish and achieve enormous professional success and personal wealth."

"In return, Activision legitimately expected them to honor their obligations to Activision, just like any other executive who holds a position of trust in the company," the statement continued. "While the company showed enormous patience, it firmly believes that its decision was justified based on their course of conduct and actions. Activision remains committed to the Call of Duty franchise, which it owns, and will continue to produce exciting and innovative games for its millions of fans."
 
Firing CEO's never works out well especially if they were to get paid the big bucks. This will be everywhere.
 
There is unsubstantiated talk that this may be a reaction to IW complaining about not receiving royalties for MWF2 and Activision taking measures to take control of the franchise if they choose not to renew their contract partnership with IW.

The blogger here admits that most of it is rumor, but there have been rumblings about this topic for months, and it's possible that it all just came to a head.
 
I hope they get every fucking dime, then use it to start a new developer called Unlimited Division. They will work on the soon to be smash hit; Command of Commitment.
 
I kept waiting for information on what "Insubordination" they were claiming, I kept imagining the two having nothing but parties during work hours or something. It looks like they finally have some lead, and it seems Jason and Vince were trying to shop around Infinity Ward (not the name, but the people in the company, as they would start a new one) and the Modern Warfare franchise to other publishers, including EA. This is getting more and more interesting.
 
I really don't see how Activision hopes to win this one. If they don't own Modern Warfare (and it's increasingly looking like they don't) then they are losing one of their top three franchises over this fiasco AND millions in royalties... and if they DO own it, they are still going to be losing Infinity Ward because NO ONE from there is going to want to work for them after what they did. It's lose/lose. They'd have been better trying to secure the trademark completely before trying any of this.
 
After Word At War's success, they probably figured, worst-case, they don't need Infinity Ward to make good Call of Duty games (and they're right).

You're right, though, the timing is really bad for their prospects. I'm starting to think that the breach of contract charge against the IW execs may be spot-on (shopping around could definitely be construed as breach of contract, depending on who you're asking), and Activision, anticipating litigation of MWF2 royalties anyways, chose to move on them first.
 
As far as I know, Activision bought both IW and the Call of Duty franchise, which would mean the guys from IW were most likely shopping themselves (IW) around to try and get out of their contract and start on something new rather then churn out CoD's for the rest of their lives. Can't say I blame them.
 
As far as I know, Activision bought both IW and the Call of Duty franchise, which would mean the guys from IW were most likely shopping themselves (IW) around to try and get out of their contract and start on something new rather then churn out CoD's for the rest of their lives. Can't say I blame them.
From the way they have been referring to it, it would seem that there is a distinction between Call of Duty and Modern Warfare. It sounds like Infinity Ward, or at least these two executives, are claiming ownership of Modern Warfare and not Call of Duty.
 
As far as I know, Activision bought both IW and the Call of Duty franchise, which would mean the guys from IW were most likely shopping themselves (IW) around to try and get out of their contract and start on something new rather then churn out CoD's for the rest of their lives. Can't say I blame them.
Apparently, they were very dedicated to the idea of putting out CoDs for the rest of their lives, but disliked the gradual loss of control of the franchise to Activision (IW *never* wanted to let other developers contribute to the franchise, they got royally pissed over Treyarch doing it the first time), and to make matters worse, they were apparently not receiving what they believed was their contractually fair share of the royalties.

Which is why they would have been shopping around, and why the suit mentions breach of contract on Activision's part. Activision is going to fight that one tooth and nail, though, because if the IW guys can show Activision broke contract first, Activision's accusations will hold a lot less water in court.
 
As far as I know, Activision bought both IW and the Call of Duty franchise, which would mean the guys from IW were most likely shopping themselves (IW) around to try and get out of their contract and start on something new rather then churn out CoD's for the rest of their lives. Can't say I blame them.
From the way they have been referring to it, it would seem that there is a distinction between Call of Duty and Modern Warfare. It sounds like Infinity Ward, or at least these two executives, are claiming ownership of Modern Warfare and not Call of Duty.[/QUOTE]

There does seem to be some sort of legal agreement between the two parties about he ownership. It seems like Activision is just trying to buy their way out of honoring it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top