He was black in the Ultimates comics (and modeled after Samuel L.) LOOONG before Samuel L. Jackson actually played him in Iron Man.Nobody seems to mind that Samuel L. Jackson is Nick Fury. He used to be white as well.
I don't really care too much about the new Spider-Man being "ethnic", but I do have an issue with Spider-Man not being Peter Parker.
Oh I know. But he used to be white.He was black in the Ultimates comics (and modeled after Samuel L.) LOOONG before Samuel L. Jackson actually played him in Iron Man.
= 2001
"The mother-f@$%ing sun will come out tomorrow"?No one minds when Samuel L Jackson does anything. He could play Annie in the Annie remake and no one would bat an eye.
Say "tomorrow" again. I dare you. I double dare you."The mother-f@$%ing sun will come out tomorrow"?
It'd probably be okay if they called him Spider-mano.You know, I really, honestly and truly thought that society had moved beyond this racist crap, but apparently not.
First off, Lawrence Fishburne has been cast for the upcoming Superman movie, The Man of Steel:
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/08/02/laurence-fishburne-is-perry-white-in-man-of-steel/
Personally, I think it's a great choice. I think back to him playing the soft-spoken father figure in the "real world" part of The Matrix and I think that could work really well for Perry White (combined with Fishburne's total badassery for when the chief gets angry).
But then, you've got people's jokes and reactions like "Um. Perry WHITE?" or "He's suposed to be white." I'm thinking, "Seriously? It's 2011, not 1911."
But then - AND THIS INCLUDES A MAJOR SPOILER FOR ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN...
...Marvel announced that, in the wake of Ult. Peter Parker's death, we have a new Spider-Man...
Miles Morales, a half-black, half-Hispanic teenager.
And the comments? Oh sweet leaping Jesus, the comments. Here's a link that has some of those comments:
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/08/02/fear-of-a-black-spider-man/
To all of this, I keep thinking, WHO FUCKING CARES what colour they are? We've already had a black Kingpin in the Daredevil movie (who was great in said role) and a black Nick Fury played by Samuel L. motherfucking Jackson.
What's worse about Miles Morales, though? The only thing that's been announced about him so far his ethnicity. And already, there are people jumping on the hate bandwagon for that, alone, without knowing anything else about the character. Of course, we can partly blame Marvel for that, since that's all they've announced, too. It's like with DC announcing the new Batwoman is a *gasp!* lesbian! Of course, thanks to Greg Rucka, she turned out to be a fantastic, deep, interesting character. I expect the same from Ult. Spider-Man writer, Brian Michael Bendis.
But this general reaction of "OMG SPIDER-MAN IS BLACK!" is ridiculous. For one, it's the Ultimate universe, not the regular universe, so it's hardly as big a deal in the first place. You've still got the regular Peter Parker hopping around the 616 Marvel Universe.
He was the only tolerable thing in that movie, mainly because he was PERFECT for the role of the Kingpin.Remember the crying out about this other comic book character?
You're welcome.On a side-note, I want to say that the idea of SLJ as Annie is possibly the most fucking awesome thing someone on this forum has ever come up with since the Kanye meme.
THIS. I don't care that Spider Man is black....I care because he's not Peter Parker.Nobody seems to mind that Samuel L. Jackson is Nick Fury. He used to be white as well.
I don't really care too much about the new Spider-Man being "ethnic", but I do have an issue with Spider-Man not being Peter Parker.
I slightly disagree on the Batman thing, only because of Batman Beyond (even though Bruce was sort of still involved) and Nightwing/Batman. They were excellent takes on the original with their own feel. They were both fantastic.THIS. I don't care that Spider Man is black....I care because he's not Peter Parker.
I'm struggling on how to explain this. Okay...so Bruce Wayne is a mask for Batman, right? Well, I submit that Spider man was one of the few comic book character where the person and alter ego matched up. Spider-Man is Peter Parker and Peter Parker is Spider-Man.
I don't think its possible to have one with out the other.
Ultimate Ben Reilly was black That would have made more sense story-wise considering his involvement with Peter's DNA wayyyyy back in the Carnage saga.I wonder if there would be this much fuss if they named him Ben Reilly. Of course they already wasted that option redoing the clone saga.
It could be argued that Terry McGinnis may have surpassed Bruce in a lot of ways. In fact, I'd say he's a lot more like Dick Grayson because they both saw what the job could do to you if you weren't careful.I slightly disagree on the Batman thing, only because of Batman Beyond (even though Bruce was sort of still involved) and Nightwing/Batman. They were excellent takes on the original with their own feel. They were both fantastic.
I didn't know there was a batman beyond comic out! I'll have to check it out. Did you see that there is a batman beyond skin for Arkham City?It could be argued that Terry McGinnis may have surpassed Bruce in a lot of ways. In fact, I'd say he's a lot more like Dick Grayson because they both saw what the job could do to you if you weren't careful.
- He hasn't isolated himself from the outside world like Bruce did. Terry may be Batman, but that's not all he is.
- He's not quite so hung-up on his father's death as Bruce was with his parents. You could argue that this is because he still has family, but it's likely more because he saw what happened to Bruce when it consumed him.
- He's not willing to give up on his girlfriend, even if it would make his life simpler. Bruce couldn't have a healthy relationship at all, mainly because his Batman duties would always come first. Also, because any woman Bruce was legitimately attracted to was ether a villain (Damian's mother), a chronic criminal (Selina Kyle/Catwoman), or as fucked up as he was (Diane/Wonder Woman).
- He's willing to work with other heroes and doesn't have the antagonistic attitude that Bruce always had (even if Terry is still stubborn about it).
I'm really enjoying the current Batman Beyond comic series and I hope it doesn't get tossed when they start up their new stuff next year.
Really? Hmmm...don't get me wrong, I have no problem with a black and gay super-hero, but given the Big Two's history in dealing with minorities....Apparently they're making him gay too. I appreciate inclusiveness as much as the next guy but this just smells of creating characters with certain traits for the sake of being different, not for the sake of making a good story.
Yeah, it's on issue 7 of the series, with a 4 part story before that. Best part? Everything that happened on the show is canon, including the movie. I'm not sure if it's part of the main universe though... Batman INC is mentioned in an issue, but I'm not sure how they can do the Tim Drake kills the Joker thing now that he's almost old enough to be an adult. They could switch Tim Drake with Damien and it works, but they'd still be killing off the Joker.I didn't know there was a batman beyond comic out! I'll have to check it out. Did you see that there is a batman beyond skin for Arkham City?
Hispanic, Black gay super-hero.Really? Hmmm...don't get me wrong, I have no problem with a black and gay super-hero, but given the Big Two's history in dealing with minorities....
My mistake.Hispanic, Black gay super-hero.
Pre-order bonus content for Gamestop, and possibly only in the UK? Ugh.I didn't know there was a batman beyond comic out! I'll have to check it out. Did you see that there is a batman beyond skin for Arkham City?
What? laaaaaaaaaaaaamePre-order bonus content for Gamestop, and possibly only in the UK? Ugh.
No kidding:It may just be the way that the interviewer is framing it, but does anyone else think that this sounds, well, like they put no thought into this whatsoever?
Yeah...“Going into this we knew we wanted to make a statement about the 21st century,” said Marvel editor-in-chief Axel Alonso.
"Spider-Man is arguably the most recognizable superhero on the planet and little kids like my son Tito can relate to him because of the red-and-blue tights,” Alonso said.
Drop the "Black" and you have the new Question. Who used to work with Batman in the Animated Series as Lt. Montoya. So the Question is now a triple-threat-minority... Female/Gay/Hispanic now everyone will love DC's second greatest detective.Hispanic, Black gay super-hero.
Well, that's one of the problems in current pop-culture. Sexuality is considered to be an essential defining characteristic. Media demands that everyone over 13 have a sexual identity and be defined by who they're attracted to, who is attracted to them, who they're dating, who they've kissed, etc. It's an absurdly skewed focus, but such prurient interest is pretty pervasive in pop-culture, for both fictional and non-fictional personalities. With that viewpoint, it's impossible to create a character without answering the gay/straight question. The assumption is that sexuality is an essential check-box in the basic questionnaire, right after "Hero or Villain?".I wish they would create a character, not a stereotype. Develop a character and make his/her sexuality not matter. Good stories/Great Saves... catch the villains. Let the gay/strait decision come up later.
You ever read The Pro? It's not that far off.At least it's not a female black/hispanic, lesbian, single mother, drug addicted, aids infected, rape survivor, Spider man.
Aside from her being female and a single mother, what else of that list defines The Pro, exactly? Yeah, it's a crude, low-brow book, but she's not AIDS infected, a lesbian or a rape survivor.