I do! Er, wait...Edrondol said:5 books of Order of the Stick. But I don't get to keep them. :waah:
Oh, gods. I'm so sorry.Cajungal said:I just bought 5 issues of Green Arrow/Black Canary.
Wasted pity, but thanks for the thought.ThatNickGuy said:Oh, gods. I'm so sorry.Cajungal said:I just bought 5 issues of Green Arrow/Black Canary.
Gah, that was like 2 weeks ago, BAD NERD!!! But yes, everyone should pick this up, was a great read.ThatNickGuy said:-The Unwritten #1 (get it! Seriously! It's only $1!)
It think it's time for a "just because" present for the fellow...kaykordeath said:Gah, that was like 2 weeks ago, BAD NERD!!! But yes, everyone should pick this up, was a great read.ThatNickGuy said:-The Unwritten #1 (get it! Seriously! It's only $1!)
Friday, I plan on picking up Batman/Robin #1 and Secret Six #10....continuing to be the best thing DC is currently putting out. Also picking up The Muppet Show #3, because that along with The Incredibles and Cars has, thanks to Boom Studios, allowed me to sit down and read comisc with my daughter that both of us are HIGHLY enjoying. Seriously...the Muppet Show book is almost just barely close enough to making it feel like you're watching the old episodes.
I... I don't understand.Covar said:Nothing really coming out this week that is on my must read list. Might have gotten Batman and Robin if it wasn't for Frank Quitely.
http://www.visionexpress.comCovar said:nope. its just plain ugly to me.
This begs exploration.lafftaff said:I bought an Archie comic. Does that count? Or should I leave this discussion with my head hanging in shame?
If it was Punisher meets Archie, then you can stay. Anything else? GTFO.lafftaff said:I bought an Archie comic. Does that count? Or should I leave this discussion with my head hanging in shame?
I found his ASS (should probably have spelled that one out) to be just as ugly as I find his other work.ThatNickGuy said:As far as Quitely goes, I can kind of unverstand where you're coming from Covar. However, I'm sure we can at least agree that the guy deserves more work in the business than, say, Rob Liefeld. And come on, tell me a lot of his work in All Star Superman wasn't absolutely gorgeous.
Whatever, I still read my moldy old Archies from grade school. Did you know that Big Moose is Dyslexic now?!?! So we're not allowed to laugh when he does something dumb. What the hell, man? What the hell?lafftaff said:I bought an Archie comic. Does that count? Or should I leave this discussion with my head hanging in shame?
Well, the #600 comic doesn't come out until August. It was a bit of both though. I used to read Archie comics pretty regularly but got out of the habit. The marriage news made me nostalgic for the comic again. I just like them because they're easy and uncomplicated and I can buy it at the grocery store.Mav said:This begs exploration.lafftaff said:I bought an Archie comic. Does that count? Or should I leave this discussion with my head hanging in shame?
Did you buy the #600 cause he was getting married / high number issue or did you buy it cause it's what you normally read and such?
:tongue:
What!? Pssh, that's like the Cookie Monster and how cookies are now a "sometimes" food. Damn PCWhatever, I still read my moldy old Archies from grade school. Did you know that Big Moose is Dyslexic now?!?! So we're not allowed to laugh when he does something dumb. What the *, man? What the *?
I take some of what you say on board and it emphasises the different aesthetic qualities that people bring to art. There are other artists who may suffer from similar issues spring to mind (Steve Pugh for example) this doesn't mean that I cannot enjoy their art, though it will not be to everyone's liking. Speed can be an issue and I understand it can piss of readers especially of monthly titles but I hold up The Rocketeer as exhibit B for the defence. I waited for years/decades for that to get finished, it never was. So in comparison to Dave Stevens anyone else is like The Flash. Speed should not be a reason to dislike some-one's art just their scheduling.Covar said:To clarify my stance on Quitely (after all i should provide more than just "its ugly"). I find his art to look "muddy" if that makes any sense. I think this stems from his inability to draw a steady line. I find the tiny swiggly lines kills any sense of texture in his art. On top of this I've yet to see him draw any person that would be a 5 or higher If I ran into them on the street. He made Emma Frost and Jean Grey look like ugly old hags when he was on New X-men. Which is actually a good lead in to my biggest issue with Quitely; his speed. I'm not saying he should be as fast an artist as Jack Kirby was, or even as fast as Mark Bagley (both of whom IMO put out better quality art), but the man can't even come close to a monthly schedule and yet continuously gets himself put on "monthly" titles.
@Mav: I had thought about attending (i've yet to go to a con), but unfortunately it once again falls on the one weekend a month I have to work.
Speed is a big additional factor to me. Not the only reason. For example I love Ethan Van Sciver and Gary Frank's artwork (Superman: Secret Origin needs to just come out already). Both artists are incapable of keeping a monthly schedule. However unlike Quitely and Brian Hitch they are not being constantly placed on monthly books. Remember All-Star Superman (not abbreviating that again) was supposed to be Monthly. Thank goodness it was self-contained otherwise you would have had the entire Superman line derailed worse than the Last Son story.redapples said:I take some of what you say on board and it emphasises the different aesthetic qualities that people bring to art. There are other artists who may suffer from similar issues spring to mind (Steve Pugh for example) this doesn't mean that I cannot enjoy their art, though it will not be to everyone's liking. Speed can be an issue and I understand it can * of readers especially of monthly titles but I hold up The Rocketeer as exhibit B for the defence. I waited for years/decades for that to get finished, it never was. So in comparison to Dave Stevens anyone else is like The Flash. Speed should not be a reason to dislike some-one's art just their scheduling.Covar said:To clarify my stance on Quitely (after all i should provide more than just "its ugly"). I find his art to look "muddy" if that makes any sense. I think this stems from his inability to draw a steady line. I find the tiny swiggly lines kills any sense of texture in his art. On top of this I've yet to see him draw any person that would be a 5 or higher If I ran into them on the street. He made Emma Frost and Jean Grey look like ugly old hags when he was on New X-men. Which is actually a good lead in to my biggest issue with Quitely; his speed. I'm not saying he should be as fast an artist as Jack Kirby was, or even as fast as Mark Bagley (both of whom IMO put out better quality art), but the man can't even come close to a monthly schedule and yet continuously gets himself put on "monthly" titles.
@Mav: I had thought about attending (i've yet to go to a con), but unfortunately it once again falls on the one weekend a month I have to work.
Is it anywhere near as good as Green Arrow was back in the 90's?Cajungal said:Wasted pity, but thanks for the thought.ThatNickGuy said:Oh, gods. I'm so sorry.Cajungal said:I just bought 5 issues of Green Arrow/Black Canary.
I've not purchased a continuing comic in 15 years, don't rely on my advice too much.Cajungal said:I'll repost this I guess:
No problem, TNG. You're the expert. And I thank both you and sixpack for the advice on what to look into next. If you say it's good, I'm guessing it's good. I'm looking forward to comparing comics from different times.
I wanted to but my folkaphobia and my dog getting sick conspired against me. Either one I could have overcome, but together...Mav said:that reminds me, Covar you going to Heroes Con this year? I wonder if Dusty (HF Dusty not Shelton's Dusty) is gonna drive down and attend.
Lotta big names this year.
Wait a minute, hold on, hold the phone. You actually paid money for The Dark Knight Strikes Again?JCM said:-Dark Knight 1&2 hardcover edition.
Scud's been on my want list for a while.Krisken said:I picked up the TPB of Scud The Disposable Assassin- The Whole Shebang.
I plan on picking up yet The Tick complete Edlund issues this week yet.
Not really into comics like I used to be.
Its not I have it. Great read, but black and white. Not having read comics when Tick originally came out were these originally in color?Alex B. said:Scud's been on my want list for a while.Krisken said:I picked up the TPB of Scud The Disposable Assassin- The Whole Shebang.
I plan on picking up yet The Tick complete Edlund issues this week yet.
Not really into comics like I used to be.
Let us know if that Tick collection is in color. I have an old collection that's I think about half the Edlund stuff, and it's colorized.
The Scud collection is B&W, and the last ten issues really tie everything together. Just when you think it can't get more bizarre, it goes just a bit further.Alex B. said:Scud's been on my want list for a while.Krisken said:I picked up the TPB of Scud The Disposable Assassin- The Whole Shebang.
I plan on picking up yet The Tick complete Edlund issues this week yet.
Not really into comics like I used to be.
Let us know if that Tick collection is in color. I have an old collection that's I think about half the Edlund stuff, and it's colorized.
Ah, I see. Yeah, I have The Naked City.Alex B. said:The original Tick series was in black and white.
I have The Naked City collection, to which they added color.
Still, that Complete is pretty tempting. Sigh.
fade said:Superman: Secret Identity.
The premise is nice. It's our world, as we know it. Even more so than Earth-Prime. A boy named Clark Kent live in Kansas. He is keenly aware of the comic character. His parents named him Clark as a joke. Anyway, it just so happens he gains Superman's powers (though it's made very clear that they aren't of the magnitude of the comic Superman's).
Quick review: don't bother. The art is nice. It's colored pencils, like my own work, only with the color laid on much thicker. The rest of the story is whiny drivel. If you like drama, read it. Otherwise, all you get is four double-sized issues of whine. The most hilarious thing is that Clark, on like the third page, says that he's "no Holden Caufield", then proceeds to whine for the rest of the series.
Spoilers:
[spoiler:2pqjm0b3]No supervillains. Superman remains secretive. He marries a Lois (after being set up on a date as a joke). No explanation other than a couple of references to a meteor strike. The closest thing to a confrontation with a super-villain is never ever resolved.[/spoiler:2pqjm0b3]
Keep your money.
Like I said, I got that. Like I said, it didn't have to be superhuman derring-do. Just something. Yeah, I read a lot of pretentiousness in Clark--usually in the things he thinks about while flying alone. But that's me. If you like it, go ahead. I didn't for stated reasons. Just don't keep misinterpreting what I'm saying about supervillains, since I've said twice now that it's not necessarily the superheroics. I just don't find it an interesting story without some conflict, be it superheroic or regular old life drama. That's why I was pointing out his successful (and uneventful beyond the ordinary) real life. I found it to be a one-trick story, and the one trick was well-explored by the end of the first book. After that it was like, "Oh jeez, he's complaining about no privacy and not getting to be his real self...again." Which I got. I know you keep pointing it out. I got it. Trust me. After he says it on every page for hundreds of pages, I couldn't help but get it.ThatNickGuy said:Mildly interested? Like how they captured him and wanted to cut him up and dissect him? How would that not make someone paranoid as all *?
Again, this was a story about what it would be like for someone with Superman's powers to exist in our world. It was not, I repeat, NOT about superheroics and superhero daring-do. If you want that, Geoff Johns has been doing a great run on Action Comics for the last few years. I don't know where you got pretentiousness from the character, either. He was a thinker and a writer, which means he's contemplative about all of his actions. Sure, he was successful in life, but rarely could he let loose and be who he really was (which in a lot of ways, encapsulates Superman as a character).
^ This. Also Secret Identity is one of my favorite Superman stories. Everything about it is excellent.ThatNickGuy said:Mildly interested? Like how they captured him and wanted to cut him up and dissect him? How would that not make someone paranoid as all *?
THANK YOU!!!! :clap:Aisaku said:^ This. Also Secret Identity is one of my favorite Superman stories. Everything about it is excellent.ThatNickGuy said:Mildly interested? Like how they captured him and wanted to cut him up and dissect him? How would that not make someone paranoid as all *?
You must read in a different way than I did, because in my head Clark's voice/narration wasn't at all pretentious, quite the opposite, he is someone who is always questioning and always in doubt, he wants to understand and figure out thigs and even the conclusions that he gets (after a LOT of flying alone) still has some hints of "I am not sure", also, I loved the structure of the series with each book taking a chapter of his life. Also loved the art style, that is rather unusual for a comic book and somehow fits with the story theme/genre.fade said:Like I said, I got that. Like I said, it didn't have to be superhuman derring-do. Just something. Yeah, I read a lot of pretentiousness in Clark--usually in the things he thinks about while flying alone. But that's me. If you like it, go ahead. I didn't for stated reasons. Just don't keep misinterpreting what I'm saying about supervillains, since I've said twice now that it's not necessarily the superheroics. I just don't find it an interesting story without some conflict, be it superheroic or regular old life drama. That's why I was pointing out his successful (and uneventful beyond the ordinary) real life. I found it to be a one-trick story, and the one trick was well-explored by the end of the first book. After that it was like, "Oh jeez, he's complaining about no privacy and not getting to be his real self...again." Which I got. I know you keep pointing it out. I got it. Trust me. After he says it on every page for hundreds of pages, I couldn't help but get it.ThatNickGuy said:Mildly interested? Like how they captured him and wanted to cut him up and dissect him? How would that not make someone paranoid as all *?
Again, this was a story about what it would be like for someone with Superman's powers to exist in our world. It was not, I repeat, NOT about superheroics and superhero daring-do. If you want that, Geoff Johns has been doing a great run on Action Comics for the last few years. I don't know where you got pretentiousness from the character, either. He was a thinker and a writer, which means he's contemplative about all of his actions. Sure, he was successful in life, but rarely could he let loose and be who he really was (which in a lot of ways, encapsulates Superman as a character).