A little bit of video editing, but mostly it'll be for gaming.figmentPez said:That said, are you going to be doing any video encoding or anything?
Might make a massive difference. There has yet to be a single game where they make such a huge difference, and only a few where they even make a significant difference. It's hard to predict the future. Will truly multi-threaded games make enough difference for it to be worth paying more for a quad core processor with a slower core speed than a dual core? I don't think anyone can answer that question right now with specifics. Generalities, sure, but not enough to decide for certain which is better for every budget range.Mr_Chaz said:And at that point they might start making a MASSIVE difference.
figmentPez said:Might make a massive difference. There has yet to be a single game where they make such a huge difference, and only a few where they even make a significant difference. It's hard to predict the future. Will truly multi-threaded games make enough difference for it to be worth paying more for a quad core processor with a slower core speed than a dual core? I don't think anyone can answer that question right now with specifics. Generalities, sure, but not enough to decide for certain which is better for every budget range.Mr_Chaz said:And at that point they might start making a MASSIVE difference.
What is your budget, anyway, TwoBit?
figmentPez said:Might make a massive difference. There has yet to be a single game where they make such a huge difference, and only a few where they even make a significant difference. It's hard to predict the future. Will truly multi-threaded games make enough difference for it to be worth paying more for a quad core processor with a slower core speed than a dual core? I don't think anyone can answer that question right now with specifics. Generalities, sure, but not enough to decide for certain which is better for every budget range.Mr_Chaz said:And at that point they might start making a MASSIVE difference.
What is your budget, anyway, TwoBit?
I'm pretty sure both the 360 and the PS3 have multiple cores. I think the 360 has 3 cores and the PS3 has more... Okay, I checked. The Xbox 360 does have a triple core processor, while the PS3 has a stranger architecture that's harder to pin down (part single core, part 7-core, hard to program thing)Bubble181 said:Multicores will ony really become important to gaming when there's a multi-core gaming console. Since so many games are ports or based on engines that also need to run on those crappy consoles,.... yeah.
ummmmmmmmHoboNinja said:Well it's hard to even find dual cores anymore, I think tiger direct only sells 2 different Core 2 Duo's anymore... the Core 2 Quad cores are about the same price as the dual core now so might as well go with it.
You can set core affinity, but it means doing some testing and tuning. It might also make better sense to turn off Hyper-threading in the BIOS if you're going to do this. Logical processors are never as good as physical ones, and it will keep down confusion as well (since when you see the list drop from 8 to 4, you'll know that all the cores you see are physical).Shegokigo said:Is there a way to \"make a core focus on something\" in particular? Like running WoW or games off one core/two cores for optimal performance?
A little over a thousand bucks.figmentPez said:What is your budget, anyway, TwoBit?
Here's a preliminary list of specs I put together:Skinny Santa said:Would you mind posting the setup you have at the moment? I'm looking myself to make a low to midrange gaming comp mainly for futureproofing than a desire a to run anything really graphics intensive aside from wow and maybe a couple other games.
Use programs such as WinAFC if you want your affinities to be permanent rather then having to set them every single time for every program.PatrThom said:You can set core affinity, but it means doing some testing and tuning. It might also make better sense to turn off Hyper-threading in the BIOS if you're going to do this. Logical processors are never as good as physical ones, and it will keep down confusion as well (since when you see the list drop from 8 to 4, you'll know that all the cores you see are physical).Shegokigo said:Is there a way to \"make a core focus on something\" in particular? Like running WoW or games off one core/two cores for optimal performance?
--Patrick