The point of the subforums is to go to those forums to discuss those topics. Not everyone talks about comics around here. Sometimes, you just want to talk about video games, so you go over there. Or movies/TV/comics. Besides, the people who discuss comics and answer your questions? GuranTEE, they'll be here. Thus, I'll be a-flaggin' this post, soon as I'm done replying.(mods dont move the thread, please, more people read General than the subforum..)
Simple answer: To make more money because collectors will buy anything.Mave said:- Why does every comic, even some B-list titles, have variants again?
Gradually over the past year. The bigger titles that would make the money made the jump first, followed by the smaller titles. Both companies are trying different things to make the price reasonable, such as DC's backup stories in some of their comics. For exampe, The Question back up in Detective Comics.Mav said:- When did some comics jump to $3.99?
Again, simple answer: It makes money. If you look at the charts of what sells the most, it's been the events. Personally, I'm with you on this and have chosen to barely buy any mainstream stuff anymore (aside from the mostly self contained seires) and trying all sorts of non-Big 2 series.Mav said:- Speaking of events, why why why are we back to this?
It's always been around, but it's becoming worse and more frequent these days because creative teams don't stay on nearly as long anymore. Plus, reboots and such are big things these days in comics, movies and TV shows. Again, it's why I've been moving away from the Big Two and prefer to stick to self-contained or creator run comics. I could recommend SO many good ones to you.Mav said:- What's with reboots of reboots of reboots?
Nostalgia. In fact, Marvel has resurfaced the Clone Saga. So nothing is sacred. Everything in the business is totally cyclical.Mav said:- 90's characters running around, after being gone for 10 years?
No idea and frankly, I don't honestly care. I don't give a rats ass to the big events that talk about "Everything will change for ever!" and "Nothing will ever be the same again!" because it's garbage. The writers (especially Bendis) have been writing characters totally out of character to suit their own needs. Really, that's no different than any other writer who takes their own viewpoint on a character and spins it their own way. It's been happening for decades.Mav said:- Kinda not so time related question but, how did Marvel recover from Civil War?
It doesn't make sense to be so restrictive about these subjects. So fuckin what if not everyone wants to talk about comics, there are plenty of other threads for them. Sometimes a thread is better off when addressed to the subforum community and sometimes it's better when addressed to the general community. As the subcommunities develop this issue will sort itself out.The point of the subforums is to go to those forums to discuss those topics. Not everyone talks about comics around here. Sometimes, you just want to talk about video games, so you go over there. Or movies/TV/comics. Thus, I'll be a-flaggin' this post, soon as I'm done replying.
Blackest Night is awesome and don't you dare say otherwise.- Speaking of events, why why why are we back to this?
I might give Invincible a try, people rave about it. Plus, if Kirkman's writing is as good on it as it is on Walking Dead, it'll be greatYou've got some pretty good ones so far, man. Aside from Hulk, but I hear that's a fun, nothing serious kinda read. Justice League is too much all over the place (due to a lot of editorial interference) for me to really get interested. Runaway, I honestly lost all interest in after Brian K Vaughan left.
A few I can recommend:
-Invincible. Seriously. Invincible.
-Sleeper, by Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips. Imagine (in a world of superpowers) a sleeper agent who is in so deep that he's on the bad guy's side, right at the top of the food chain, working for the big bad. Unfortunately, the ONLY guy who knows that it's all and act? The only guy that could pull him out of it? He's a coma.
The first "season" (12 issues) is out in trade and the second season just came out this week.
The stuff Moore wasn't involved in isn't bad, but it's not great ether. At least it finally gives us some more stuff about The Rumor, which Moore never bothered to do.-Top Ten, by Alan Moore. It's like NYPD Blue with superheroes. GREAT stuff. I'd stick with the first two volumes, followed by the Smax mini-seris and the Forty-Niners graphic novel. Everything else after that isn't by Moore.
Sleeper is actually part of a much longer story-arc that began way back in Alan Moore's run on WildC.A.T.s in the early 90s.Sleeper sounds awesome, reminds me a lot of Bucky/Winter Soldier, I'll give that a look.
Hey, I'm not talking 30 years of mismatched continuity here, I'm talking about direct setup stories put in place over very short runs by two authors, Alan Moore and Ed Brubaker.Sorry, Takeo. Speaking as someone that's only read Sleeper, I'm going to say that's entirely untrue. It's self-contained within its own world with little to no reference to ANY of the things you mentioned before. Aside from Point Blank which, as you said, is essentially the pilot. But I've never read it and that took away exactly no enjoyment from me in my reading of Sleeper.
I think explaining all of that is part of one of the things that Mav was complaining about in the first place.
But you have to admit that there's quite a bit of difference between a more or less self-contained run that benefits from pre-established directly-set up continuity that requires at most 2 or 3 other chronologically-distinct trades to flesh out everything and a giant maxi-event like Secret Invasion that dangles plot threads in all directions and actually requires simultaneous reading of 26 (no lie) separate trades in order to have a full grasp of a brief event in time.I'm only speaking as someone who prefers to read self-contained stories that dont need half a dozen other volumes to understand it. Sure, you might get more out of it, but it's still not needed.
You mean Gail Simone's re-launch? That was really good. It was a cool, fresh take on the old characters that actually made an attempt at making it a comic book about bioweapons also about growing up and pop-culture pressure.Wait.... Gen13 is back!?!? LINK!?!?
Oh wait, are you talking about the 2006 reboot? Is that PoS still going
Collecting for money was never my goal. I collect to read, the stories, the characters, thats what I enjoy.Is there really any point collecting comics anymore? Your quite literally not going to see any return on that investment for 40-50 years, and unless we suddenly have some kind of event like a war or plague that results in most of those collections going missing, they aren't going to be worth jack squat. The only reason the older Golden Age stuff is worth anything is because of the paper recycling drives during WW2.
Collecting for money was never my goal. I collect to read, the stories, the characters, thats what I enjoy.Is there really any point collecting comics anymore? Your quite literally not going to see any return on that investment for 40-50 years, and unless we suddenly have some kind of event like a war or plague that results in most of those collections going missing, they aren't going to be worth jack squat. The only reason the older Golden Age stuff is worth anything is because of the paper recycling drives during WW2.
Ye Gods no[/QUOTE]That picture is full of all kinds of win!
The Red Hulk thing is hilarious also... too bad they're not doing it on purpose...Who gives a shit what crappy story it has behind it, the picture is hilarious.