All of the above.If I may ask, what are you hoping to protect your kids from? Online predators and/or scammers? Objectionable material? Excessive gaming or other stuff that might hurt their schoolwork?
Again it's not a matter of them trying to find a way around the protection, because I'm not trying to hide it from them. If they get around it, I will find out and they will lose the computer. Simple as that.bhamv3 said:I ask because while I don't have kids myself, I have lots of experience circumventing any blocks, filters, or other measures implemented by my parents and schools. Chances are, whatever measures you take, your kids are going to find ways around them sooner or later.
Of course I teach them how to avoid things they should and people they should. However, are you more likely to do something bad/wrong if you're not being watched? The answer is absolutely. They're amazing kids, but everyone makes mistakes of judgement. I want to know if it happens so I can help them avoid it again in the future.bhamv3 said:Basically, instead of watching me all the time, they taught me the online equivalent of not accepting candy from strangers. I think, regardless of what software you choose to use, teaching your kids how to protect themselves online is probably necessary too.
Oh I absolutely agree, simply telling them what to do or what not to do isn't going to be enough. The mischief I got up to in my youth is proof enough for me. I was just suggesting that, in addition to the blocks and filters and other software measures, it's probably also necessary to teach them how to protect themselves. A double thrust, if you will.All of the above.
Again it's not a matter of them trying to find a way around the protection, because I'm not trying to hide it from them. If they get around it, I will find out and they will lose the computer. Simple as that.
Of course I teach them how to avoid things they should and people they should. However, are you more likely to do something bad/wrong if you're not being watched? The answer is absolutely. They're amazing kids, but everyone makes mistakes of judgement. I want to know if it happens so I can help them avoid it again in the future.
I'm sorry if that sounds like I don't trust my children, I simply don't feel comfortable giving them 100% un-supervised internet access. I simply don't want to tell them they can't use the computer if I'm not home (which is happening now since they can only use it if I'm monitoring on Team Viewer, which I can't do if I have to go out for an errand)
I have no idea how to rate this so I'm going to reply with:Gilg doing the right thing as a parent. Kids need to learn how to sneak porn on the computer. If it's just there for the taking, they never develop problem solving skills.
All it would take is seeing in the log, a google search for the log breaker or again, if I saw them gaming and didn't see it in the log etc.Some online games (especially MMOs) give you a way to transcribe your game chat into text files in the options. Look in the options for the games they play if it's there. If it is, tell them your turning it on and will be looking at them every once in awhile. If the logs stop, so does their gaming time.
Um, excuse me? My kids have always had monitored gaming, be it Xbox Live, PSN, even their NDS online. It's never been an issue and there's never been a -resentment backlash- so I'm not sure where you're coming from with that.However, there is nothing you can do to stop your kids from doing what they want online. They will beat any program, often with just a Google Search. You might catch them, but that's not the point. What they REALLY resent is the fact that you didn't trust them to begin with and that lack of trust is going to make your life HELL. It will bleed over into every aspect of your lives and YOU will be the one to suffer for it, not them.
I appreciate your advice and the time you took to write it, but until you're a parent, you can't really see where I'm coming from with this. Again, I never said I was going to monitor it 100%, the problem is that right now I have to because Team Viewer is the only program I have to keep an eye on them. If I had a -keylogger- or some kind of nanny watch program then I could just review it every now and then and it wouldn't be a problem. It's a problem now BECAUSE I have to watch them 24/7.So my advice? If you actually feel that your children aren't mature enough to use your PC without being monitored, don't let them use it to begin with. If you think it's time to let them on it, just check the history/logs every once in awhile. If it starts disappearing or an actual issue comes up, THEN you bring the hammer down. But you need make it clear to them that your not going to be doing this all the time.
Trust is to be earned, not given.What they REALLY resent is the fact that you didn't trust them to begin with and that lack of trust is going to make your life HELL. It will bleed over into every aspect of your lives and YOU will be the one to suffer for it, not them.
If you actually feel that your children aren't mature enough to use your PC without being monitored, don't let them use it to begin with.
I wonder what you discovered at age 11.I became lodged in a pine tree when I learned to bike on my own, and I used the internet in a way my parents approved of from the ages of 9-11.
I'm pretty sure we all know what is to blame.I wonder what you discovered at age 11.
Geocities. Millions and millions of pages of filth.I wonder what you discovered at age 11.
They don't have personal phones and won't for a good while yet either.I was going to say you should give them some freedom, but hell, at that age I was doing all KINDS of objectionable stuff on the computer, with and without other parties involved. Plus I know people around that age now that do even more than I did. Sexting is surprisingly big in 13-year-old land.
Sounds like a keylogger is your best and easiest bet. Watch out for them phones, too, that's where a lot of the shit happens.
EMRYS![DOUBLEPOST=1350201829][/DOUBLEPOST]I wish Shego and Sera would come back....Make sure you block Halforums. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy on the internet.
Gilg doing the right thing as a parent. Kids need to learn how to sneak porn on the computer. If it's just there for the taking, they never develop problem solving skills.
Spectorsoft.
I know it's pricey. $100 now. (When I first bought it it was $70.)
But it records everything and you can play it back like a VCR. You can look at IMs, see what they download, check times & sites they were on. I did this to my kid's computers and told them that it was there recording. They knew it was on there. And every so often I would go in and play what they had & go from there.
What I discovered/stopped:
There are a couple more things I did with it that shall not be named, but suffice it to say that it paid for itself in piece of mind for a long, long time.
- My son was visiting porn sites. I didn't really care about that, but they weren't safe ones. So I showed him where to go to not kill the computer.
- But the biggest one was probably when my daughter was IMing strange men. I got screen caps of the chats and contacted each of them telling them if they ever contacted my 12 year old daughter again these transcripts were going to the police and I was contacting their ISPs. Never heard from any of them again. Then I educated my daughter about online predators and showed her how to be safe.
Vs the kinds of parents who don't care/try/check? What kinds of kids do those parents have?
As opposed to teach kids what to do vs what not to do.Vs the kinds of parents who don't care/try/check? What kinds of kids do those parents have?
As opposed to teach kids what to do vs what not to do.
Of course I teach them how to avoid things they should and people they should.
This is flat out a false dichotomy, and you know it.Vs the kinds of parents who don't care/try/check? What kinds of kids do those parents have?
T (of course, seeing as I don't actually have children, that apparently makes anything I say invalid).
I wasn't being condescending. I'm not pretending anything. I simply said that it's not possible to understand the psyche of a parent if you are not one. I didn't want you to think that I felt your advice was rendered pointless, it just takes on a different meaning to someone with a different psyche. I am sorry you took it that way.
My mother instilled in me a core value system and trusted me enough to let me use that value system in situations where she is not there.
I'm wondering why I have to keep repeating myself as if others aren't reading what I wrote and are instead putting words/scenarios in my mouth/situation.Of course I teach them how to avoid things they should and people they should.
This is my point, you're assuming how I parent my children 100% of the time, and not simply how they're online, here in the home.Net nanny stuff is all well and good, but what happens when your kids are at school, out at a party, etc. Do you feel they need to be consistantly monitered there as well?
I teach them values, and protection every single day. I have since they were old enough for comprehension. They've always known that if they do something bad in school, I will find out because I talk to all their teachers through email. I go to every open house and speak with their teachers in front of them.What makes the internet really different from the rest of the outside world?
My point is, I find the rising culture of paranoia that people are perpetuating is slowly eroding bonds between people as a whole.
Exactly. I don't let my kids go to bars and raves. They aren't old enough to understand or handle themselves in the situations that arise in those locations.What makes the internet really different from the rest of the outside world?
I dunno, I understand restricting access, which is what Steinman is talking about, but 24-7 monitoring of their activity seem awful draconian to me.
Let me also make it clear that the only reason I have Team Viewer (a camera pointed at them) the entire time they're online is because I don't have anything better at the moment just to know where they went/who they talked to. That's all I want to know, and that's all I want out of nanny-tech.
In the real world I have their teachers and their friend's parents. Online, I have nothing like that without a nanny tech.
It's all about stages. You don't let the 2 week old out of your sight. It's 24/7 monitoring. When they start toddling you put up gates and you still keep an eye - or ear - on them 24/7.I dunno, I understand restricting access, which is what Steinman is talking about, but 24-7 monitoring of their activity seem awful draconian to me.
Giving them the internet access alone was my expansion. I've put off giving them their own computer to use online for a very long time. They've been asking for a couple years now and to ease the issue I'd take them to the library 2-3x a week and let them use those computers.you can learn when to expand the garden, or grant some access outside the garden for a field trip with the parent.
Pretty much everything you wrote got addressed in the posts.Gil I did not get to read every post here,
You know this from personal experience?He just throws a pint of warm yogurt on your back and goes, "UGH!"
Around here, how would anyone know the difference?Nothing keeps you silky smooth like old man splooge.
(And this thread has officially taken a weird turn to the dark side.)
Oi, I'll have you know...No, he's not.