I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I am gainfully employed so she has nothing to worry about. But if I get fired....So Espy, have you stopped beating your wife?
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I know it's a local thing, so I can't say it's a nationwide truth.An extensive 2004 report by the National Institute of Justice found that the rate of violence against women increases as male unemployment increases. When a woman's male partner is employed, the rate of violence is 4.7 percent. It's 7.5 percent when the male experiences one period of unemployment. It's 12.3 percent when the male experiences two or more periods of unemployment.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
Well yeah, 'cause then you have to buy a fake mustache and use that glue and it's just a mess and that really takes time out of your wife beating, filibustering, school kid lunch stealing, old people killing time.You forgot the moustache-twirling. The moustache-twirling is very important.
Especially if you don't have a moustache.
I would venture it's probably true, it certainly seems like common sense as others have pointed out, although I doubt it's merely the one factor.Ok, doing some searching. The best I could find was this
I know it's a local thing, so I can't say it's a nationwide truth.An extensive 2004 report by the National Institute of Justice found that the rate of violence against women increases as male unemployment increases. When a woman's male partner is employed, the rate of violence is 4.7 percent. It's 7.5 percent when the male experiences one period of unemployment. It's 12.3 percent when the male experiences two or more periods of unemployment.
That's a fine hypothesis, Dave, but without data to support it Harry Reid is blowing smoke out of his ass.Men TEND to think of their job as their self-worth. Men without jobs feel powerless and worthless. Men who have the tendency of becoming abusive do so not because they are angry and not because they hate the person whom they are abusing, but for power. So it really does stand to reason that the cause & effect is there.
That's a fine hypothesis, Dave, but without data to support it Harry Reid is blowing smoke out of his ass.[/QUOTE]Men TEND to think of their job as their self-worth. Men without jobs feel powerless and worthless. Men who have the tendency of becoming abusive do so not because they are angry and not because they hate the person whom they are abusing, but for power. So it really does stand to reason that the cause & effect is there.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]I dunno, there were plenty of people willing to vote against protecting contractors over-seas from getting raped. Beating women on the home front shouldn't be a problem.Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
I'm sorry, you must not have met my friend "fear-mongering" in order to get bills passed. No one wants to vote against the bill that stops men from beating on their wives.[/QUOTE]I dunno, there were plenty of people willing to vote against protecting contractors over-seas from getting raped. Beating women on the home front shouldn't be a problem.[/QUOTE]Saying "Men, when they're out of work, tend to become abusive" is just plain stupid though.
Actually the data does back up at least peripheral cause/effect on the unemployed/abuse thing. The rest is proselytizing on my part.This thread hurts my brain. Dang armchair psychologists!
Well yeah, 'cause then you have to buy a fake mustache and use that glue and it's just a mess and that really takes time out of your wife beating, filibustering, school kid lunch stealing, old people killing time.You forgot the moustache-twirling. The moustache-twirling is very important.
Especially if you don't have a moustache.
I would venture it's probably true, it certainly seems like common sense as others have pointed out, although I doubt it's merely the one factor.[/QUOTE]Ok, doing some searching. The best I could find was this
I know it's a local thing, so I can't say it's a nationwide truth.An extensive 2004 report by the National Institute of Justice found that the rate of violence against women increases as male unemployment increases. When a woman's male partner is employed, the rate of violence is 4.7 percent. It's 7.5 percent when the male experiences one period of unemployment. It's 12.3 percent when the male experiences two or more periods of unemployment.
That sounds exactly like someone I know. Asshole at work, asshole at home, asshole without a job, asshole who's abusive--all in one person!GUYS
your missing one little thing
the kind of people who beat their wives, the ones with seriouse anger management problems are also probably the same kinds of people that would get fired.
That sounds exactly like someone I know. Asshole at work, asshole at home, asshole without a job, asshole who's abusive--all in one person![/QUOTE]GUYS
your missing one little thing
the kind of people who beat their wives, the ones with seriouse anger management problems are also probably the same kinds of people that would get fired.
Ah, Stockholm Syndrome. It's a hell of a curse ain't it?^ my best friend's bro was a street cop for a single day. He went out on a domestic disturbance call, the woman was badly beaten and bloodied. He arrests the husband, and as he was cuffing the husband, the wife charged across the room with a butcher knife trying to free her man. He shot her dead in her tracks and turned in his badge when he got to the station.