For my first story, I am going to tell the one from the above quote that I referred to as "Moo."Oh my god, I have so many stories from working in a call center. I did 8 years of tech support. I'm about to go home, so may try to type a few out later.
Just as a teaser and to jog my memory later, I will leave these here:
Broken Bubble
Shotgun English Lady
Tornado
Moo
I may have told some of those stories before, but if anyone wants to hear them again, I will more than happily tell them.
A few notes about the above comments:The heavy pounding didn't start until 11:30 or so. When it was a few minutes after midnight, I heard glass shatter down North hallway. There was a whole bunch of glass and junk on the floor, and the door glass of rooms 34, 35 and 36 were smashed out. Apparently, Mr. Smith and Mr. Stallings had also managed to break their room door lock (When I did lock checks at 11:00 PM, all doors were secured and double-locked). Smith had a two-inch long deep gash on his right arm, cutting through flesh to the bone. Stallings had attempted to get out of the room but was handcuffed by patrol staff and placed in room 19. Smith was taken off grounds to MHO to have his arm examined around 1:15 PM. When patrol staff came at about 12:15, Mr. Singleton attempted to crawl out his broken-out room window. Singleton, Mr. Hogan, Mr. Clark, Mr. Roberts and Mr. Carroll all were sticking their heads out of their broken windows numerous times during the morning until about 2:30 AM.
At about 1:00 AM, one of the three started yelling that if I walked down the hallways to their room, I was going to have piss thrown on me. A few minutes later, the residents of room 35 claimed that one of their roommates had a cut "on his chest". Another one of the roommates stuck his arm out and the other staff who was with me, YC Biefeld, saw some blood on the arm. We called the supervisors about it, and they said to wait. Meanwhile, the residents of rooms 35 and 36 continued to throw things out of their door windows: soda cans, and (at about 1:45 AM) a cup of what may have been piss. When YC Vopal finally came into the cottage around 2:15 AM, Mr. Singleton and Mr. Hogan finally (apparently) went to sleep. Smith returned at 3:15 AM, and was placed in room 19 with Stallings.
Right now, as it stands (4:00 AM), Stallings and Smith are on Level for damage and disruptive (creating a disturbance?). Singleton and Hogan are also at least on Level I for damage, disruptive and (potentially) attempting to run away. I'm not certain about the residents in room 35, but I believe an investigation should be made into whom actually broke the window and which one of the five made threats to staff. All seven residents participated in some way to the disturbance.
This guy, "Bob", used to work for us as a translator. He was one of the company's first employees back when we were first established in the 90s. His long history with the company coupled with the fact that he's an amazing translator (seriously, I've seen his work, and I will happily admit he's much better than me) meant that the company sometimes bent over backwards to accommodate him. You see, Bob required very precise conditions to work. His workspace had to be almost entirely silent, and he was not to be interrupted in any way when he's working. Furthermore, he didn't like to talk to people verbally, which meant he didn't want to talk to people face to face or over the phone. If you needed him for something, you had to email him or send him a message over our messaging program, and he'd get back to you when he felt like it.I posted a long, anonymous rant about something that's happening at work, but it looked like it's still possible to figure out which company and/or organization I'm talking about, so I deleted it and I'm posting the TL;DR instead:
There are ignorant people launching a witch hunt against some folks in my company, and as a result we may lose some of our best workers.
Knowing a company will accommodate that kind of hostile work environment is rather alarming.I have a story about my current company (the translation company), though it's about a coworker who no longer works here. Specifically, it's the details of this post I made in 2016 in the Rant thread:
This guy, "Bob", used to work for us as a translator. He was one of the company's first employees back when we were first established in the 90s. His long history with the company coupled with the fact that he's an amazing translator (seriously, I've seen his work, and I will happily admit he's much better than me) meant that the company sometimes bent over backwards to accommodate him. You see, Bob required very precise conditions to work. His workspace had to be almost entirely silent, and he was not to be interrupted in any way when he's working. Furthermore, he didn't like to talk to people verbally, which meant he didn't want to talk to people face to face or over the phone. If you needed him for something, you had to email him or send him a message over our messaging program, and he'd get back to you when he felt like it.
Any deviations from his preferred state of things would lead to Bob getting upset. In the worst case scenarios, he'd end up yelling, like really screaming, at whatever or whoever drew his ire. But the company put up with him because he could really churn out translations at an amazing speed and quality.
Bob got his own office, which was a big deal because everyone else in the company worked out of cubicles, apart from our CEO. Unfortunately, Bob's office shared a wall with our conference room, which meant that if meetings got a bit too animated, he'd barge into the conference room and start yelling. It got to the point where we'd start scheduling meetings for times we knew Bob wouldn't be in. Still, this wasn't always possible, so after one too many meetings got interrupted by an angry Bob, the company paid to soundproof his office. This meant Bob didn't barge into meetings to yell any more, though he would still yell at people elsewhere.
Now, pretty much everyone at the company was warned about Bob soon after joining, and they were told that he's very important to the company because he's a godlike translator, so please just stay out of his way and don't bother him. Pretty much everyone was okay with that, they understood how the company would treasure such a productive employee, and they were happy to keep away from him. Unfortunately, we aren't the only company on this floor of our office building. There are three other organizations on this floor, and we all share amenities such as elevators and bathrooms. One day, Bob headed to the bathroom, and on his way back he found his route blocked by two women from the company next door, who were talking to each other and apparently hadn't noticed him. Well, Bob blew up at them. Someone from our company would know that this is Bob being Bob, and would probably just apologize and scurry away, but these two women had no way of knowing that, and they were also (justifiably, of course) rather upset at suddenly being yelled at by this strange man. So their argument escalated until I'm pretty sure everyone in the building could hear the yelling, and I think I heard some things being thrown, until the two sides were finally separated.
In this modern social media era, pretty much everything that happens will make its way online somehow. Well, the two women went onto Facebook to post about this aggressive man from our company who'd yelled at them for no reason, and included our company's name and a description of Bob. This set off a gleeful witchhunt against our company's employees, with a bunch of people speculating about Bob's name and title, and frequently conflating him with other employees who had nothing to do with him or the argument. In some cases they even dug up outdated info and speculated that Bob was someone who didn't even work here any more. This whole ordeal led to some of our employees getting unduly harrassed, to the point where some of them were considering leaving the company.
In the end, the company gave Bob an ultimatum. He could head over to the company next door and apologize, or we'd have to let him go. He chose the first option, and went over and apparently gave a very sincere apology, in which he acknowledged that he was wrong and that he can be difficult to work with, and said he's sorry for his actions. The two women went on Facebook and posted about Bob apologizing, which apparently mollified the angry mob, and things settled down.
Still, this incident apparently marked the beginning of the end of the company being willing to make such extensive accommodations for Bob. His more outlandish demands, such as no one talking to him, were deemed unrealistic. He left the company around a year later, I believe on fairly good terms, and now Bob the yelling translator exists only in legends, which we sometimes use to scare new employees into behaving themselves.
I definitely get what you mean, but well... I guess he didn't yell that much. Like once every few months or so? Basically when we heard Bob's voice we'd all just go, "Yep, there goes Bob again." I don't think anyone in the company ever contemplated leaving due to Bob.Knowing a company will accommodate that kind of hostile work environment is rather alarming.
You mean because they stopped trying to give this high functioning autistic person the support and work environment he needed to be a valuable member of society and really make a difference?Knowing a company will accommodate that kind of hostile work environment is rather alarming.
I did hear from my old supervisor that Bob was on the spectrum, but I never really tried to confirm it.You mean because they stopped trying to give this high functioning autistic person the support and work environment he needed to be a valuable member of society and really make a difference?
Sure, one might think Bob's just a dickhead, but reading it like that, I'm...pretty sure the issues stemmed from him being non-normie. I have a colleague who....well, I've never known him to yell, but that's because he actually *does* still have the only Windows XP PC in the building, and he's the only one who got to take his old desk chair with him when we moved buildings, and his is the only cupboard that isn't located in the central walkway but just behind his office like it was in the previous buildings, and he doesn't have to sit in on meetings he doesn't want to, etc. He can read code like I can read a novel, though.
Most companies will bend over backwards to protect valuable employees, even if they have bad behavior. Hell, this is why sexual predators seek positions that make them invaluable; they know companies will protect them over a less valuable employee and many victims won't report the abuse at all, lest their careers suffer. It's exceptionally rare to see stuff happen to these guys unless their victims organize and go public, though it's happening more often seen #MeToo.Knowing a company will accommodate that kind of hostile work environment is rather alarming.
Yanooo, I's a gotsa funny story about that one.Most companies will bend over backwards to protect valuable employees, even if they have bad behavior. Hell, this is why sexual predators seek positions that make them invaluable; they know companies will protect them over a less valuable employee and many victims won't report the abuse at all, lest their careers suffer. It's exceptionally rare to see stuff happen to these guys unless their victims organize and go public, though it's happening more often seen #MeToo.
It sounds to me like "Bob" is somewhere on the spectrum. The accommodations he requires don't sound all that difficult and though he had an awkward social interaction, he took responsibility and apologized. I don't think Bob is a bad guy here.Knowing a company will accommodate that kind of hostile work environment is rather alarming.
This is also exactly why I hated grades on a curve. Yes, let's reward those people who struggle but finally managed to make some meaningful progress with a big fat F.If you have a team of 5, and all 5 are amazing, why should you be forced to fire the least amazing person
I've almost never seen grades on a curve bottom out at anything lower than a C, unless someone flat out did nothing.This is also exactly why I hated grades on a curve. Yes, let's reward those people who struggle but finally managed to make some meaningful progress with a big fat F.
--Patrick
I don't think this is as universal a problem as you think it isImagine trying to work while a beautiful woman sitting across from you is thoughtfully sucking on an oversized straw
This reminds me of a story.I don't think this is as universal a problem as you think it is
Dilbert today perfectly sums up how I feel about stacked ranking assessments.I was out of work for 3 years (except some occasional short-term contract work that mostly served to reset the clock on the unemployment benefits) after the tech bubble burst.
In 2003, Citibank offered me a job. They called me on a Friday, and asked me if I could start on Monday. "Absolutely." I say.
I was living in Houston at the time. Citibank's tech site was in Irving, 250 miles away. So, I get up at 4am on Monday, drive to Irving, do my first day on the job, and then immediately check into a long-term hotel. That hotel would be my home for 6 weeks until I could rent a house and get the rest of my family moved up.
I really enjoyed the job, and enjoyed the people, but quit after less than two years. They hired a new CIO, Mitchell Habib. He had just come from GE, where he saved the company a ton of money by outsourcing everything overseas. He promised he wasn't a "one trick pony" and that he wasn't coming to Citi to do the same thing--but, within a few months he instituted monthly staff ranking. The bottom X people on a team every month would be let go, and replaced by--you guessed it--offshore workers from India.
One one hand, this ranking can sound reasonable. Sure, every team has slackers, and getting rid of them can strengthen the team. But in practice, it sucks. It's political. You may be the best developer in the world, but if you piss the wrong person off at the wrong time, bam, bottom of the list. And it's stupid. If you have a team of 5, and all 5 are amazing, why should you be forced to fire the least amazing person to be replaced by offshore?
So, me and a couple other older guys saw the writing on the wall and got out of there ASAP. Everyone told me I was crazy, because I consistently scored at the top of the rankings. But I didn't want to work in that kind of environment...and no matter how good you are, eventually, the job is going overseas. Eventually the layoffs got more aggressive.
This Just In: Habib Resigns from Citigroup
I just got word that Mitchell Habib resigned from his post as CIO of Citibank North America "on or about 10/24/2006," according to my source, who says no reason was given for his resignation. His last day is November 1.www.cio.com
I can't find anything more substantive, but I remember at the time reading some articles that the board was upset that Habib had destroyed the corporate culture in IT, and that the speed and quality of software releases had gone down dramatically. But that's just my memory. I wish I could find one of those articles now.
He ended up an Neilsen...and you guessed it. One-trick-ponied up the outsourcing.
It still grinds my gears that this guy makes millions doing this.
That's when people leave work on a gurney or in a body bag.Another time, I was in the bathroom, just washing my hands before returning to my desk when the door opened and in lumbered Tom. His breathing was heavy and he was sweating a bit. As he walked past me I heard him under his breath say "Oh dear..."
Wow! How is that not cause for termination at your place of work?You accept the shift, you accept the drawer. And if it's over or short, it is now YOUR problem. Why is that you know I count the drawer such a hard concept to grasp? You know I count the drawers first thing EVERY SINGLE NIGHT. So why do you think you don't need to when you come on? This position had ZERO transactions throughout the day, so why is it $7.50 short? You took in no cash on the desk, so why is *it* $10 short?
Anywhere else, such a discrepancy is cause for immediate termination. A shrug and an "I dunno" is unacceptable.
(Forgot to mention the ten or so items missing out of the cooler. Where did they go if there were no transactions?)
I remember the catalogs with Julie on the cover and candids of the other reps near the page numbers. I even remember an article for “What is Julie up to these days?” some time after she left the company (but was still appearing on the covers). I also felt like the level of service declined about the same time they stopped including the rep portraits in their catalogs.I almost exclusively went through MacWarehouse to do it. They had a branch that handled PC stuff (MicroWarehouse I think?), but I could purchase pc stuff through MacWarehouse with certain reps that had access to both systems.
Unfortunately, I don't remember my rep's name as it was nearly 30 years agoI remember the catalogs with Julie on the cover and candids of the other reps near the page numbers. I even remember an article for “What is Julie up to these days?” some time after she left the company (but was still appearing on the covers). I also felt like the level of service declined about the same time they stopped including the rep portraits in their catalogs.
—Patrick
I genuinely would not have been surprised if this story ended with "And then we got married."So, another from that place I used to work at.
One of the jobs I did there, in addition to tech support, was purchasing. I was solely responsible for all the computer purchasing for the company. As we were in an aggressive multi-year hardware rollout with our affiliates, I spent about $2 million a year on PCs and parts and $3 million a year on Mac products.
I almost exclusively went through MacWarehouse to do it. They had a branch that handled PC stuff (MicroWarehouse I think?), but I could purchase pc stuff through MacWarehouse with certain reps that had access to both systems.
Shortly after taking the job, I found a rep at that company that was perfect. She would get me items out with 2-day shipping, without fail. If I had a problem (dead on arrival part, etc), she would ship another one instantly, and give me a credit for the broken one while awaiting the return. I was usually on the phone with her 2-4 hours at a time, 2-3 days a week.
MacWarehouse didn't let their reps have direct lines, but whenever I called in, I would always request to be transferred to her and other reps were good about it.
We did this for nearly a year--and then she got a new boss. Her boss was all about micromanaging call volume, and she was told she was spending too much time on the phone with me. She'd been written up after she ignored him and gave me the standard time we usually spent. I tried to deal for a couple of weeks, but the other reps just didn't give me the same level of customer service that she did. So, one day, when I was annoyed at some rep not giving me the dead-on-arrival fast turnaround that I needed, I asked to speak to the supervisor.
Once I got him on the phone, I explained that I only ever wanted to deal with that one specific rep, and that if I couldn't work with them, I'd be taking my business elsewhere because there were cheaper alternatives if I couldn't get the VIP white-glove service that I'd become accustomed to. He laughed and told me that he was sorry that I felt that way, but we were listed as a "small business" and didn't rate a personal rep.
I laughed back. "We're listed that way, because this is a sole proprietorship, and the owner doesn't want to release his personal financials to you. Tell you what. I'll start ordering elsewhere, and you look over my order history and call me back in a week or two if you want to keep my business."
And, so I did. And, of course, it sucked. But no moreso than MacWarehouse when dealing with random reps.
Less than 2 weeks later, I get a call from the guy. He's super sycophantic and grovelling and begging us to come back to MacWarehouse. I guess he realized that 5 million dollars worth of combined purchases a year was a big deal after all. And so, among all the apologies and grovelling, he asked what he could do to earn my business. These were my demands:
So, I got everything I asked for, and my work life was good again.
- Get my rep on the phone in a conference call, and apologize to us both.
- Put it in writing that I could talk to her as long as I wanted. Acknowledge that I spent enough at the store that if I wanted to spend 8 hours a day on the phone with my rep, 5 days a week, it was totally fine.
- Promise I'd never hear from him or about him again.
Several months after that, I had to go do some installs in the same city that my sales rep worked out of, so we made plans to meet and have dinner. Over the course of dinner, I learned that the sales reps made commission, and that because of me, she'd had a *very* good year.
We spent a lot of time on the phone, and eventually started talking a lot after work, too. There was some interest there, but the distance factor made it non-feasible, especially in those early days of the internet. She ended up getting married a couple of years later.I genuinely would not have been surprised if this story ended with "And then we got married."
Pay me more or I will quit and work at Walmart for $18 an hour.Ready to put this on the boss' desk. Any changes you think I should make first?
It really needs to be on his door, with a fucking dagger through it.8.75 after 4 years of night shift? Your letter should be written in blood and end in 'or else.'
Two people both came by to pay back the $15 one borrowed for the other and didn't write down?Counted the drawer when I came in tonight. $15 short. Counted again and again. $15 short. I document it and assume that something might have been missed in the afternoon, like boss ordering Chinese, paying from the drawer, and forgetting to note it. It happens.
I take a cash paying guest overnight, and get the drop ready for the end of my shift later this morning. As usual, I recount the drawer to make sure it's even.
I'm $15 OVER.
NANI!?!?!?
Elves or goblins the most likely.Two people both came by to pay back the $15 one borrowed for the other and didn't write down?
The elves paid you back with interest?
Goblins playing with your mind?
I wouldn't be surprised if this is a widespread practice at tech companies.
Not only is it in fact a widespread practice, you might be surprised at just how widespread.If I'm lucky, I'll end up with a used but working FLIR E4 camera which I can hack into an FLIR E8 camera (hardware is the same, software limitations only) which is worth $4,000, for almost 90% off.
I have gone on record saying that I will work far harder and endure more BS for an immediate superior I respect and admire than I ever would for some faceless company.I think what he said has, at least in part, affected the sense of loyalty I feel to this company.