Huh? It was pretty straightforward.Krisken said:I just saw Event Horizon for the first time the other day. Wow, talk about making about as much sense as Doom.
3d+drugs or bustSeraRelm said:Coraline was pretty good. It had some humorous moments in the right spots and didn't come off as heavy handed or trying to hard like Mirrormask ended up doing for me. Nice voice acting, good music, lovely animation, clever designs and a solid story.
And no, I did not (sadly) see it in 3D.
Yeah, it was straightforward. Opens to chaos dimension. Yay. Still didn't make much sense.Charlie Dont Surf said:Huh? It was pretty straightforward.Krisken said:I just saw Event Horizon for the first time the other day. Wow, talk about making about as much sense as Doom.
It was a portal to hell that torments everyone to death.Krisken said:Yeah, it was straightforward. Opens to chaos dimension. Yay. Still didn't make much sense.Charlie Dont Surf said:Huh? It was pretty straightforward.Krisken said:I just saw Event Horizon for the first time the other day. Wow, talk about making about as much sense as Doom.
Seems like you might like my review in the spoilers thread.Cajungal said:The last movie I saw was Watchmen. I liked it a lot, and I hadn't read the book yet, so I didn't know at all what to expect. The soundtrack actually amused and delighted me. I liked most of the actors, except the female protagonist. She was only ok. My favorite character was Night Owl.... probably because I'm a sucker for the guy with huge glasses. One more nit pick... the old Mrs. Jupiter's makeup was horrid. But we didn't have to see her up close that much.
I enjoyed the story and the acting very much, and I can't wait to read the graphic novel!
I give this movie....
out of
I'm going to go ahead and interpret these smilies as saying it's a mediocre movie overrated by people that haven't seen many moviesKoko said::shock:
:aaahhh:
aranoid:
:rcain:
I'm going to interpret your post as elitist and ignorant. Heaven forbid somebody should enjoy something.Charlie Dont Surf said:I'm going to go ahead and interpret these smilies as saying it's a mediocre movie overrated by people that haven't seen many moviesKoko said::shock:
:aaahhh:
aranoid:
:rcain:
thanks, I am elite, and I also enjoy a ton of movies.Docseverin said:I'm going to interpret your post as elitist and ignorant. Heaven forbid somebody should enjoy something.
To each their own, I watched it with a good friendCharlie Dont Surf said:thanks, I am elite, and I also enjoy a ton of movies.Docseverin said:I'm going to interpret your post as elitist and ignorant. Heaven forbid somebody should enjoy something.
Koko said:3/5ths of the way through he stood up and said "fuck this shit" and walked out.
I think the differentiating factor could have possibly been the influence of Mary Jane on my consciousness throughout the film.cvgurau said:Koko said:3/5ths of the way through he stood up and said "smurf this *" and walked out.
This is what I should've done, but didn't.
Sadly, I watched that thing through to the end, hoping it would start making sense.
It didn't. rly:
LittleSin said:Oh god...I'm going to make a name for myself here but the last movie I saw was the Death Note live action feature. I actually really enjoyed it. I haven't seen part two yet but the direction they've taken is great and it has better acting in it then most Japanese live action films I've seen.
The last movie in theatres I saw was Watchmen. I really liked it.
The next movie I want to see is Star Trek but it comes out the day before I'm due to give birth. Although...it would be awesome to go into labor during the movie. If its great I can say it was so great the baby wanted to see...if it's terrible I can say that it was so bad it induced labor.
You are awesome!North_Ranger said:LittleSin said:Oh god...I'm going to make a name for myself here but the last movie I saw was the Death Note live action feature. I actually really enjoyed it. I haven't seen part two yet but the direction they've taken is great and it has better acting in it then most Japanese live action films I've seen.
The last movie in theatres I saw was Watchmen. I really liked it.
The next movie I want to see is Star Trek but it comes out the day before I'm due to give birth. Although...it would be awesome to go into labor during the movie. If its great I can say it was so great the baby wanted to see...if it's terrible I can say that it was so bad it induced labor.
That's the second thing you've drawn for me.North_Ranger said:Nah, I just like to doodle And you inspired me to draw that.
I will check it out.Shegokigo said:Seems like you might like my review in the spoilers thread.Cajungal said:The last movie I saw was Watchmen. I liked it a lot, and I hadn't read the book yet, so I didn't know at all what to expect. The soundtrack actually amused and delighted me. I liked most of the actors, except the female protagonist. She was only ok. My favorite character was Night Owl.... probably because I'm a sucker for the guy with huge glasses. One more nit pick... the old Mrs. Jupiter's makeup was horrid. But we didn't have to see her up close that much.
I enjoyed the story and the acting very much, and I can't wait to read the graphic novel!
I give this movie....
out of
Fair enough, but it's kind of rude to invite people into a thread to talk about movies and then insult their tastes when they do.Charlie Dont Surf said:thanks, I am elite, and I also enjoy a ton of movies.
I'm just insulting movies, not individual posters. I guess the "overrated by people that haven't seen that many movies" was kind of like that, but the poster didn't really say they loved DD either.ZenMonkey said:Fair enough, but it's kind of rude to invite people into a thread to talk about movies and then insult their tastes when they do.Charlie Dont Surf said:thanks, I am elite, and I also enjoy a ton of movies.
Back on topic and somewhat related: I saw The Jerk last night. That shit was funny as hell. All my life I thought it was just a "hurr hurr he's dumb" movie but it was much funnier than that.
This is how I feel about Donnie Darko (minus the "people that haven't seen many movies" since I know people who have seen tons of movies that still love that dumb movie)Charlie Dont Surf said:I'm going to go ahead and interpret these smilies as saying it's a mediocre movie overrated by people that haven't seen many movies
This is why I don't tell people my opinion about Donnie Darko very often.Docseverin said:I'm going to interpret your post as elitist and ignorant. Heaven forbid somebody should enjoy something.
Well, in a civilized conversation, I could say "Really? I liked it a lot. What didn't you like about it?" and then we could have fun discussing the movie itself and its pros and cons, rather than have to defend ourselves against attacks on our taste in general.Lally said:This is why I don't tell people my opinion about Donnie Darko very often.
Oh, I definitely don't think I'm cool, haha, especially in my taste in movies. I meant, I don't tell my opinion about Donnie Darko because I'm in the minority about it. When I told my boyfriend I didn't think it was all that, he just told me that I didn't like it because it was popular. :\ZenMonkey said:Well, in a civilized conversation, I could say "Really? I liked it a lot. What didn't you like about it?" and then we could have fun discussing the movie itself and its pros and cons, rather than have to defend ourselves against attacks on our taste in general.Lally said:This is why I don't tell people my opinion about Donnie Darko very often.
But , civilized conversation about movies here, what am I thinking? It's more important to find out who's cool enough to like the "right" movies.
You're so cute. I wasn't talking about you.Lally said:Oh, I definitely don't think I'm cool, haha, especially in my taste in movies. I meant, I don't tell my opinion about Donnie Darko because I'm in the minority about it. When I told my boyfriend I didn't think it was all that, he just told me that I didn't like it because it was popular. :\
Haha well, I just wanted to make sure everyone knew that I have terrible taste and I often sound snarky when I don't mean to. As far as the comment, it wasn't totally unmerited -- I have been known to be more negative toward a movie when I think it is "just okay" and everyone else has hyped it up a whole bunch.ZenMonkey said:You're so cute. I wasn't talking about you.Lally said:Oh, I definitely don't think I'm cool, haha, especially in my taste in movies. I meant, I don't tell my opinion about Donnie Darko because I'm in the minority about it. When I told my boyfriend I didn't think it was all that, he just told me that I didn't like it because it was popular. :\
Kind of an odd statement from the BF, if you don't mind me saying so. I don't know you that well but I'm pretty sure you can figure out for yourself whether and why you don't like a movie. :bush:
i liked this movie when i saw it in the theater but i agree about the epicness. i really feel it would have been a better movie if they downplayed the kid and ended at the first ending, rather than drag it out to the second ending.stienman said:I just saw Australia last night - It was very enjoyable, though not the epic I think it was intended to be (and if they didn't intend it to be an epic they should have cut it shorter than 2:45!).
Lally said:This is how I feel about Donnie Darko (minus the "people that haven't seen many movies" since I know people who have seen tons of movies that still love that dumb movie)
Lally said:As far as my last movie seen... I honestly can't remember. Not much of a movie person. :\ I'm thinking it was Burn After Reading. That's the latest one I remember, anyway. It was pretty good, I liked how ridiculous everything was and I think everyone did a pretty good job. It was either that or Zack and Miri Make A Porno, which I loved.
Don't watch Lord of the Rings, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Moulin Rouge, When Harry Met Sally, The Fountain, and if you're into anime, Fushigi Yuugi, just for good measure.Shegokigo said:Yeah, people like you are how I base my movie preferences. Complete opposite. Makes it easier to tell what I'm going to like/dislike.
Fixed that for you. You're dead on. Thank you.Lally said:Don't watch: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Moulin Rouge, When Harry Met Sally, The Fountain, and if you're into anime, Fushigi Yuugi, just for good measure.Shegokigo said:Yeah, people like you are how I base my movie preferences. Complete opposite. Makes it easier to tell what I'm going to like/dislike.
This movie is amazing. I'm glad I got to see it in theater.mortualio said:please rent "let the right one in" ...do yourself a favor and watch this amazing, not absolute shit vampire movie. sit back and drink in the wonderful detail, story, and acting. i wont even start with the great cinematography...just go...now!!!
Eh, the main theme was holding on and letting go, and the kid was merely part of that theme. But since it wasn't a real epic, it couldn't fit that many different views of the same theme and still remain cohesive, so yeah... They should have cut it down.wana10 said:i liked this movie when i saw it in the theater but i agree about the epicness. i really feel it would have been a better movie if they downplayed the kid and ended at the first ending, rather than drag it out to the second ending.stienman said:I just saw Australia last night - It was very enjoyable, though not the epic I think it was intended to be (and if they didn't intend it to be an epic they should have cut it shorter than 2:45!).
Ah. The original Casino Royale then.Gruebeard said:I recently watched Casino Royale. It was very much like Event Horizon in that I really couldn't understand the point of it all, and was totally lost about 10 minutes in. I actually found Woody Allen funny, though - at least in his first scene - so that's something, right?
That goes without saying since the original is mindboggingly atrocious.Shawnacy said:I enjoyed the recent one much better myself.
I saw Death Note 2 like 4-5 months ago in the theater, it was pretty neat. I haven't seen the first one and I have only seen a bunch of random episodes of the show but I still enjoyed it.LittleSin said:Oh god...I'm going to make a name for myself here but the last movie I saw was the Death Note live action feature. I actually really enjoyed it. I haven't seen part two yet but the direction they've taken is great and it has better acting in it then most Japanese live action films I've seen...
I loved both so your little theory might not workShegokigo said:Lally said:This is how I feel about Donnie Darko (minus the "people that haven't seen many movies" since I know people who have seen tons of movies that still love that dumb movie)Lally said:As far as my last movie seen... I honestly can't remember. Not much of a movie person. :\ I'm thinking it was Burn After Reading. That's the latest one I remember, anyway. It was pretty good, I liked how ridiculous everything was and I think everyone did a pretty good job. It was either that or Zack and Miri Make A Porno, which I loved.
Ok, hated DD, loved ZnM?
Yeah, people like you are how I base my movie preferences. Complete opposite. Makes it easier to tell what I'm going to like/dislike.
Leo's also amazing in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, Gangs of New York, Catch Me if you Can, The Aviator, The Departed, and Revolutionary Road.Shegokigo said:Body of Lies -
Leonardo DiCaprio, showing yet again he's not just "Never let go Jack" anymore.
Oh yeah, forgot about Departed and Catch Me.Charlie Dont Surf said:Leo's also amazing in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, Gangs of New York, Catch Me if you Can, The Aviator, The Departed, and Revolutionary Road.
I don't recall the title being spoken by anyone in the movie so this uh, is a complete non-issue?fade said:I always thought it was kind of funny that they gave that movie (Departed) a title that is absolutely slaughtered by the Boston accent.
Maybe to you. I just thought it was funny, given that the movie takes place in Boston.Charlie Dont Surf said:I don't recall the title being spoken by anyone in the movie so this uh, is a complete non-issue?fade said:I always thought it was kind of funny that they gave that movie (Departed) a title that is absolutely slaughtered by the Boston accent.
Indeed. Great movie, but it is hard to not say the title "De-pah-ted".fade said:Maybe to you. I just thought it was funny, given that the movie takes place in Boston.Charlie Dont Surf said:I don't recall the title being spoken by anyone in the movie so this uh, is a complete non-issue?fade said:I always thought it was kind of funny that they gave that movie (Departed) a title that is absolutely slaughtered by the Boston accent.
Actually, Matt Damon's character does speak it once, when, during a briefing regarding a dead body he asks what "the departed's" name was.Charlie Dont Surf said:I don't recall the title being spoken by anyone in the movie so this uh, is a complete non-issue?fade said:I always thought it was kind of funny that they gave that movie (Departed) a title that is absolutely slaughtered by the Boston accent.
Simfers said:Still a non-issue, really.
did it come out this weekend in some limited release, or are all you people talking about it just horribleSeraRelm said:Dragonball: Evolution.
Absolutely horrible. It was actually worse than I was expecting. I would rate it as bad as Twilight except I think they actually tried to put a plot to this one.
Spoiler, but not a spoiler. I think they should have called it Dragonball: The Last Airbender.
(Seriously, they call it air-bending. I shit you not)
Twilight sucked and you know it. :humph:ZenMonkey said:I watched a movie. I really enjoyed it. Great performances (except for one), looked beautiful, interesting story. Kind of a let-down of an ending but overall I'd recommend it.
Shegokigo said:Twilight sucked and you know it. :humph:ZenMonkey said:I watched a movie. I really enjoyed it. Great performances (except for one), looked beautiful, interesting story. Kind of a let-down of an ending but overall I'd recommend it.
Connections.Charlie Dont Surf said:did it come out this weekend in some limited release, or are all you people talking about it just horribleSeraRelm said:Dragonball: Evolution.
Absolutely horrible. It was actually worse than I was expecting. I would rate it as bad as Twilight except I think they actually tried to put a plot to this one.
Spoiler, but not a spoiler. I think they should have called it Dragonball: The Last Airbender.
(Seriously, they call it air-bending. I shit you not)
Oh please, limited release or piracy are the only ways anyone ever gets to see a movie before the rest of the country and you know it.SeraRelm said:Connections.Charlie Dont Surf said:did it come out this weekend in some limited release, or are all you people talking about it just horrible
Saw Monsters Vs. Aliens as well yesterday and this was pretty much my reaction as well.Charlie Dont Surf said:Monsters and Aliens 3D was really fun. I love 3D technology, the movie basically made me feel 5 years old. There were a handful of really lame gags that didn't work, which is basically the dreamworks signature at this point.
I thought this was one of the best movies of 2008! I'm curious what you didn't like about it.Silvanesti said:Rachel getting married.
fucking pointless.
The inaccuracies ruined it for me, would have been fine if they made up some city in Alaska...but it was kinda ridiculous.JCM said:30 days of night.
Pretty good movie about a bunch of people in Alaska trying to survive when some vampires go there for sport (its night for 30 days there), removed the bad taste of pacing the comic
Your wife was standing over your shoulder as you typed that. It's the only explanation for your defending of sparkly vampires.KCWM said:Twilight was the last movie I watched (because my wife and her friend were watching it via On Demand). It wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it was going to be. Seems like an interesting world the author has created. I'd love to be cool and say it totally sucked, but I'd be lying.
Koko said:The inaccuracies ruined it for me, would have been fine if they made up some city in Alaska...but it was kinda ridiculous.
it's actually dark there for 67 days
population is 4x the depicted size
it's 60% eskimo pop, where they're all white in the film
the 'darkness' is actually bright twilight
has daily 737 flights
Check the time. I was at work.Shegokigo said:Your wife was standing over your shoulder as you typed that. It's the only explanation for your defending of sparkly vampires.KCWM said:Twilight was the last movie I watched (because my wife and her friend were watching it via On Demand). It wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it was going to be. Seems like an interesting world the author has created. I'd love to be cool and say it totally sucked, but I'd be lying.
ehhh...making things up is great, but i don't know...changing the facts of life for no reason just pickles my fiddle.Charlie Dont Surf said:Koko said:The inaccuracies ruined it for me, would have been fine if they made up some city in Alaska...but it was kinda ridiculous.
it's actually dark there for 67 days
population is 4x the depicted size
it's 60% eskimo pop, where they're all white in the film
the 'darkness' is actually bright twilight
has daily 737 flights
No.... No.... a movie changed facts for a better dramatic effect... no... my god... the horror......
you can't really see much in the movie because of the extremely shitty camera work by everyone involved, cha-BOOMTwitch said:Quantum of Solace was fun, you can see every "twist" coming from a mile away but, cmon, it's a James Bond movie.
It was like "what if James Bond was retired and had a daughter"?LordRendar said:I watched Taken. It was glorious, revengefilled Violence. Loved it.
Jane Lynch. She's fantastic. Also, Paul Rudd is definitely one of my favorite actors. He's great in I Love You, Man too.Cajungal said:I watched Role Models again a few days ago... still great. I thought it was going to be worse than it was, but Paul Rudd did really well. And I always love that weird blond woman... whatever her name is. She's really funny. The only thing I didn't really like was that joke with the bagel dog. Mreh...
whoa whoa WHOA. Calm down now.SeraRelm said:Monsters vs Aliens: better than The Incredibles by a large margin.
THANK you!... guess I could have just looked it up, but thank you! I can't wait to see I Love You, Man. I love both of those guys.Charlie Dont Surf said:Jane Lynch. She's fantastic. Also, Paul Rudd is definitely one of my favorite actors. He's great in I Love You, Man too.Cajungal said:I watched Role Models again a few days ago... still great. I thought it was going to be worse than it was, but Paul Rudd did really well. And I always love that weird blond woman... whatever her name is. She's really funny. The only thing I didn't really like was that joke with the bagel dog. Mreh...
HoboNinja said:I am either going to see Adventureland or Fast & Furious tonight. Probably Adventureland.
I thought the same thing! During that first car chase, I was so confused. I still liked the movie and everything... it was exciting, but sometimes I just got lost.Charlie Dont Surf said:you can't really see much in the movie because of the extremely shitty camera work by everyone involved, cha-BOOMTwitch said:Quantum of Solace was fun, you can see every "twist" coming from a mile away but, cmon, it's a James Bond movie.
Oh yeah. I couldn't believe they did that. I had to rewind the DVD and watch it again. o_0Charlie Dont Surf said:Golden Gun is pretty awful. You left out how they ruined a completely amazing car stunt scene with a slide whistle too.
All the Rush stuff slayed me in this movie. I came home and played it on Rock Band immediately. Also, all of Paul Rudd's feeble attempts at bro-speak.phil said:I love you, man is pretty hilarious. I watched it after hearing horrible news, and still laughed my ass off. Bromance at it's best.
it's almost like Michael Bay is a horribly shitty director that can fuck up the best movie ideasShegokigo said:Pretty sad when you can tell what's going on in a muscle/racing car race and not in a transformer fight.
Titus Pullo for the win!ThatNickGuy said:Punisher: War Zone.
Honestly, it felt a * of a lot more like a Punisher movie than the previous one did. It was big, dumb action with lots of explosions and a high body count. Dialogue and acting was terrible for the most part, but I thought the new guy playing Punisher did a great job. He came across more like Frank Castle than the other guy did.
I got to talk to one of the survivors who visited the grave at the end and he told me about how Spielberg had booked them all for the flight in coach and they had refused to go until they got first class. He was an amusing guy.ThatNickGuy said:After doing the CN Tower climb yesterday, I vegged out on the couch and watched a couple of movies borrowed from the library:
1) Schindler's List:But I loved the final touch at the end with all the surviving members, who were also characters throughout the film, coming to the grave of Schindler alongside the actors that played them.
Yeah, I don't blame Spielberg it was just how the man phrased it, something like "We've been through everything already, if he thinks that we're going to fly coach he's crazy"ThatNickGuy said:I can kind of understand his reasoning. I mean, the movie only had so much of a budget. And imagine the NUMBER of people that they were trying to fly out all at once. That would've been some major dough.
Man, I hated that movie. [spoiler:2s8uaubc]When the bad guy's major plot revolves around no one in a crowded airplane ever noticing that the main character had a child with her, which he has no reason to believe would happen, the movie has a problem.[/spoiler:2s8uaubc]fade said:Flightplan (2005): This movie was fairly bad. 2/5 stars at best, and only that high because of the uptempo pace at the end. In fact, that's the biggest problem with this film: the glacial pace. It's only 1hr 38min, but by the end, you think about a decade has passed. The beginning is especially slow. Here, the film tries too hard to be highbrow, with moody music, desaturated coloring, and Edgar Rice Burroughs-style cut-up, all of which serve little purpose in the grand scheme of a thriller. Without spoiling anything, the plot is wildly unswallowable, and takes place in an airplane the internal size of which would make the Tardis blush with jealousy. Don't rent it unless you're really really bored. Because if you aren't, you will be.
That scene between Affleck and Liv Tyler still makes me retch a little. Ben Affleck is the epitome of unsexy as it is without [spoiler:2ay9xhnm]adding some kind of weird cookie fetish into the mix.[/spoiler:2ay9xhnm]Charlie Dont Surf said:True story, I watched Armageddon last night, and as the credits rolled, I silently stood up and grabbed the DVD case and ripped it in half.
Cajungal said:That scene between Affleck and Liv Tyler still makes me retch a little. Ben Affleck is the epitome of unsexy as it is without [spoiler:314wwzyr]adding some kind of weird cookie fetish into the mix.[/spoiler:314wwzyr]Charlie Dont Surf said:True story, I watched Armageddon last night, and as the credits rolled, I silently stood up and grabbed the DVD case and ripped it in half.
CynicismKills said:Crank 2. Jason Statham as kaiju.
What else can I say?
Awesome, that's what.
Saw that today. I really enjoyed it, myself. It's, in essence, the perfect mindless movie. An absolutely nutty film with sex, violence and logic holes out the wazoo, it's the perfect film to have with some friends and just laugh yourselves silly. I mean, I do have to categorize this film as awesome. I mean, what can you say about a film which has, as CynicismKills said, a Jason Statham kaiju scene or [spoiler:nzngr761]a big shoot-out between Asian hookers, leatherclad gay black men and a Hispanic gang[/spoiler:nzngr761]?Charlie Dont Surf said:CynicismKills said:Crank 2. Jason Statham as kaiju.
What else can I say?
Awesome, that's what.
I saw that Thursday and I still literally have no idea what to think about the movie.
It was too awesome, that was the major downfall.Charlie Dont Surf said:CynicismKills said:Crank 2. Jason Statham as kaiju.
What else can I say?
Awesome, that's what.
I saw that Thursday and I still literally have no idea what to think about the movie.
Alfredson has stated that he is not happy that the film is being remade, saying that "Remakes should be made of movies that aren’t very good, that gives you the chance to fix whatever has gone wrong"
I have to agree. If you remove the vampire element, this movie would still stand well on its own.Shegokigo said:Best vampire movie ever though? No, sadly. No.
Shegokigo said:Watched Let The Right One In last night. Gonna say this.
I was dissapointed.
Now why? It was marketed to me in the wrong way. How? Right on the cover it said: "Best. Vampire. Movie. Ever."
No. It wasn't. Was a fantastic movie? Oh most definitly. It was well written, well paced, well acted. Best vampire movie ever though? No, sadly. No.
Few things bothered me too:
[spoiler:2511lxhf]The whole no genitelia. Was it a boy with a removed fireman? Hence the scar and the "I'm not a girl", and if so? Why? Was it just that they don't have genetelia after they're "turned", I mean, wtf?[/spoiler:2511lxhf]
And I could have done without the "cat scene". Seriously pointless.
Also, some shitty news: The director of Cloverfield, Matt Reeves, has aquired the rights to a "remake". This is what the first movie director had to say about it:
Alfredson has stated that he is not happy that the film is being remade, saying that "Remakes should be made of movies that aren’t very good, that gives you the chance to fix whatever has gone wrong"
Nosferatucvgurau said:As for "best vampire movie ever"? I don't know. I just can't think of any better ones, ATM.
Twilight, obviously. :blargh:Shegokigo said:Nosferatucvgurau said:As for "best vampire movie ever"? I don't know. I just can't think of any better ones, ATM.
Dusk Till Dawn
Bram Stoker's
The Lost Boys
http://www.jinx.com/men/shirts/geek/buf ... cs=2&csd=2A Troll said:Twilight, obviously. :blargh:Shegokigo said:Nosferatucvgurau said:As for "best vampire movie ever"? I don't know. I just can't think of any better ones, ATM.
Dusk Till Dawn
Bram Stoker's
The Lost Boys
What was the one with James Woods, where he got stuck in some mid-Texas/Mexican town?Shegokigo said:Nosferatucvgurau said:As for "best vampire movie ever"? I don't know. I just can't think of any better ones, ATM.
Dusk Till Dawn
Bram Stoker's
The Lost Boys
Keep in mind, I said better "vampire" movies, not better film.
CynicismKills said:I'm a bit drunk and can't Google-fu it. But it was a good Vamp-slayer movie.
Again, drunk and can't depend on my search-fu.redapples said:CynicismKills said:I'm a bit drunk and can't Google-fu it. But it was a good Vamp-slayer movie.
Ummmm imdb? Vampires was the name and it certainly was better than Ghosts of Mars which has to be a Carpenter low point.
That would have made my list if not for the retarded ending.Shawnacy said:"30 Days of Night" Is the only one I can think of. At least everyone was smart enough to know the difference between a loved one and someone who wants to bite your @#$%ing head off.
For me the opposite happened. Over the years of seeing Spielberg's very heavy handed method of getting his point across in his movies, I've grown less and less fond of Schindlers list and even feel its slipping onto my "worst movies" list.North_Ranger said:I just watched Schindler's List for the first time in a decade. I remember loving that movie when I first saw it - I must have been thirteen or fourteen at the time, if memory serves. But now when I watched it... I broke in tears during the scene where the Schindlerjuden and the actors who played them were bringing stones to Oskar Schindler's grave. It may have been the music, it may have been that these people were actually there, or it may have been the fact that I've had my first stress-free day today in six months... but I cried like a baby.
I usually don't cry... I didn't cry even at my grandmother's funeral... but now I just couldn't help it.
Please be awesome, please be awesome, please be awesomeCrimsonSoul said:I'll talk about it tomorrow after Star Trek
But wasn't it fun to hear Liam Neeson say, "Damnit man, this is no time for a dick-measuring contest!MisterSteve said:And Taken was surprisingly good, although I would have preferred less combat and more ... um... smartness? Like Michael Weston in the 1st season of Burn Notice or something. Still awesome, though.
Cajungal said:But wasn't it fun to hear Liam Neeson say, "Damnit man, this is no time for a *-measuring contest!MisterSteve said:And Taken was surprisingly good, although I would have preferred less combat and more ... um... smartness? Like Michael Weston in the 1st season of Burn Notice or something. Still awesome, though.
yay Liam ^_^ I loved that movie. It was exciting!
Ugh, yeah, the beginning was horrible, cliched "character development" that was predictable, added nothing to the story, and seemed to be trying to get across the message "never go anywhere. Ever. Or you will be made into a sex slave."Charlie Dont Surf said:Taken was such a pleasant surprise, even if the first 1/3 was unwatchable.
If it had gone 5 minutes longer, I would have been cheering for her to be brutally murdered.Cat said:The beginning of Taken was awful but by the time I stopped laughing at the daughter's retarded run the action was starting.
I watched that movie with my father a while back. It sparked a conversation about how a lot of Canadian movies seem to be incredibly crass.ThatNickGuy said:Bon Cop, Bad Cop
A hugely successful Canadian film (budget of $8 mil, made $12 in box office) that is entirely bilingual. Meaning, unless you're bilingual, yourself, you pretty much need the subtitles just to follow along. It was confusing at some points, because the switch between English and French is like when you have two friends who are bilingual and switch between English and French without any warning during their conversation.
Still, it was a great buddy cop movie and hilarious. Though, I think you'd have to be Canadian to fully appreciate it and a lot of the Canadian jokes. Plus, the finale with the bad guy and how they stop him is probably THE best beating of a villain I've ever seen. Great stuff.
I didn't think Taken was a terribly good movie. It was, however, a terribly good watch-Liam-Neeson-romp-through-Paris.Charlie Dont Surf said:If it had gone 5 minutes longer, I would have been cheering for her to be brutally murdered.Cat said:The beginning of Taken was awful but by the time I stopped laughing at the daughter's retarded run the action was starting.
I don't think I've heard of one person actually liking this movie.ThatNickGuy said:Seven Pounds.
Honestly, I thought it was overly sentimental crap. They don't get into his reasoning as to why he chose those 7 people to "save" or "fix" and the sacrifice was just ridiculously over the top. I don't know why people thought this movie was so great.
[spoiler:1hvs0omv]He chose seven people because that's the number of deaths he caused in the car accident. Both the other family and his fiancee. The whole point was to atone for that sin. The jellyfish was used because he knew it would be able to kill him quickly before the medics arrived.[/spoiler:1hvs0omv]Charlie Dont Surf said:I don't think I've heard of one person actually liking this movie.ThatNickGuy said:Seven Pounds.
Honestly, I thought it was overly sentimental crap. They don't get into his reasoning as to why he chose those 7 people to "save" or "fix" and the sacrifice was just ridiculously over the top. I don't know why people thought this movie was so great.
No, it was used because that would be fucking hilariousFar said:[spoiler:1koumbzd]He chose seven people because that's the number of deaths he caused in the car accident. Both the other family and his fiancee. The whole point was to atone for that sin. The jellyfish was used because he knew it would be able to kill him quickly before the medics arrived.[/spoiler:1koumbzd]Charlie Dont Surf said:I don't think I've heard of one person actually liking this movie.ThatNickGuy said:Seven Pounds.
Honestly, I thought it was overly sentimental crap. They don't get into his reasoning as to why he chose those 7 people to "save" or "fix" and the sacrifice was just ridiculously over the top. I don't know why people thought this movie was so great.
And I liked it. Didn't love it but I did like it.
Well this is going to be right at the top of my to watch list.JCM said:Great frame-by-frame remake of an Austrian experimental film.
A family goes on vacation near a lake only to have two rich and well-educated teens invade their home and play psychological games with them, while breaking the 4th wall many times, even daring the audience to bet how long the family survives, or saying "you'll love this" before some sickening revelation.
I've heard it's amazing, I wish I could have seen it without knowing the twistCat said:Well this is going to be right at the top of my to watch list.JCM said:Great frame-by-frame remake of an Austrian experimental film.
A family goes on vacation near a lake only to have two rich and well-educated teens invade their home and play psychological games with them,[spoiler:6x73asoq]while breaking the 4th wall many times, even daring the audience to bet how long the family survives, or saying "you'll love this" before some sickening revelation.[/spoiler:6x73asoq]
It endedSimfers said:Saw Star Trek (the new one) last night. There's nothing about this movie I didn't like.
Too true.Charlie Dont Surf said:It endedSimfers said:Saw Star Trek (the new one) last night. There's nothing about this movie I didn't like.
Touché.Charlie Dont Surf said:It endedSimfers said:Saw Star Trek (the new one) last night. There's nothing about this movie I didn't like.
Cajungal said:Hah.
No, my thought process was more like: "Hmm, this isn't as terrible as I've heard-----o wait---------mreungh."
Charlie Dont Surf said:Cajungal said:Hah.
No, my thought process was more like: "Hmm, this isn't as terrible as I've heard-----o wait---------mreungh."
BACK TO BACK
ADAMANTANIUM BULLETS
Is that the one based on Dial M for Murder?Charlie Dont Surf said:I watched A Perfect Murder last night, and it was really generic with nothing really interesting other than the detective character. Who shows up and seems really cool in the first act, then does absolutely nothing for the rest of the movie.
I think this is one of the more underrated movies of the 90s. It really captures the feeling of Neverland, the good AND the bad. I enjoyed the set design. London felt just stereotypical enough, and Neverland felt like a child's fantasy, not a psycho's drug trip (i.e. still grounded strongly in reality). I was sad to see the critics tear it apart. It really was in strong keeping with Barrie's play/book. If you read the book, Pan is a self-centered brat. And rightly so. He's a kid, through and through. Williams captured that, and Hoffman almost made Hook sympathetic. I thought one of the best moments of the entire film was when we see Hook without his wig. That floored me. It was choc full o' symbolism. Here is Hook, this aging man, trying to forcibly catch Childhood, only to have its very expression removed from his grasp when Pan left Neverland. The story continued Barrie's exploration of childhood and innocence well.Philosopher B. said:Hook
I hadn't watched this movie since sometime in the nineties. I wanted to re-watch it and gain an adult perspective on it. I actually expected to be repulsed and expected to have the uncontrollable urge to hurl throughout the movie. Surprisingly, I found myself enjoying it. Maybe I'm a bad person, or maybe it was purely the nostalgia talking, but I had a lot of fun watching it. As over-done and excessive as it is, it's a blast to look at, and I found I understood the themes a lot better this time around. I nearly got teary-eyed during what was hands down the best scene, i.e. Peter learning once more to fly. One thing that definitely lifted this movie up was the score. The score was so amazingly awesome, it blew me away hearing it again. Clearly, John Williams was still in his prime and going strong. I swear that the first Harry Potter's score sounds like this one in parts.
Also, BANGARANG.
Um.... but I liked 300 and Sin City.... rly:Lumax said:The Spirit
Never ever ever ever EVER let Frank Miller make another movie.
EVER!!
So did I, but The Spirit is THAT BAD.Shegokigo said:Um.... but I liked 300 and Sin City.... rly:Lumax said:The Spirit
Never ever ever ever EVER let Frank Miller make another movie.
EVER!!
I saw this a couple weeks ago too. I thought it was awesome.Cajungal said:Saw MY Name is Bruce and laughed my plentiful butt off. It was ridiculous and fun.
I cannot express how much I love REC. Big thumbs up for not watching the horribly lame American version!twitchmoss said:i watched this alone. in the dark.
fresh trousers please.
I'd recommend watching trailer on Youtube, but it's a bit decieving as it makes it look really freakin good. Short version: creature with spines and regeneration attack 4 people who hide out in a convience store. The spines enter your body and zombify you, eventually turning you into a creature with spines that regenerates.ThatNickGuy said:What's Splinter about there, Sheg? As a casual horror flick fan, I'm curious.
And now you know the biggest reason I didn't like it.TwoBit said:I really enjoyed Splinter. Sure it was a tad too short, but at least it didn't try to overdo the gore factor, like some films do.
I remember seeing that in the movies. Yes the big screen should make it funnier. I have not seen it since though.CynicismKills said:I saw this a couple weeks ago too. I thought it was awesome.Cajungal said:Saw MY Name is Bruce and laughed my plentiful butt off. It was ridiculous and fun.
It's not a twist, it's just part of the movie. The movie isn't... normal in any sense of the word so you aren't going to miss out by knowing this ahead of time.Charlie Dont Surf said:I've heard it's amazing, I wish I could have seen it without knowing the twistCat said:Well this is going to be right at the top of my to watch list.JCM said:Great frame-by-frame remake of an Austrian experimental film.
A family goes on vacation near a lake only to have two rich and well-educated teens invade their home and play psychological games with them,[spoiler:2eszvg10]while breaking the 4th wall many times, even daring the audience to bet how long the family survives, or saying "you'll love this" before some sickening revelation.[/spoiler:2eszvg10]
A FUCKING JELLYFISHShegokigo said:Seven Pounds: Utter tripe. Normally I'd blame it on my bias against Will Smith, but that was evened out by my infatuation with Rosario Dawson. Simply put, the movie failed. The main character's entire "reason" for doing what he does just ends up feeling pathetic, as in I didn't feel sorry for him, I thought he was trash. The people chosen (were there even 7?) was never really explained as far as motive, a couple were but even those reasons were weak [spoiler:14ebqav1]Your husband beats you? Here's a beach house you'll never be able to afford paying the taxes on[/spoiler:14ebqav1] and every damn result of his actions were pretty much similar in outcome [spoiler:14ebqav1]"I"ll love you forever and give you a great life, oh wait, no I'm gonna kill myself"[/spoiler:14ebqav1] was just flat out ridiculous. Skip this movie if you want a good drama. It was poorly paced, alot of really wooden acting and a pathetic broken plot.
You're new to American Censorship aren't you?bhamv2 said:Enemy at the Gates was just on cable.
Pretty much as good as I remember, the last time I saw it. Problem is, they cut the sex scene.
People shooting the * out of each other, blowing each other up, corpses and body parts everywhere, all fine. A completely non-explicit scene of intimacy, which serves an important purpose in the overall narrative? You're out of here!
Well done there, censor dude. :eyeroll:
I'm in Taiwan though. Our censorship here is probably even more strict than the States.Shegokigo said:You're new to American Censorship aren't you?bhamv2 said:Enemy at the Gates was just on cable.
Pretty much as good as I remember, the last time I saw it. Problem is, they cut the sex scene.
People shooting the * out of each other, blowing each other up, corpses and body parts everywhere, all fine. A completely non-explicit scene of intimacy, which serves an important purpose in the overall narrative? You're out of here!
Well done there, censor dude. :eyeroll:
On topic, Enemy at the Gates has to be one of my alltime favorite movies, easily top 20. the reasons should be obvious.
You better not steal my bit there, buddy, or it's the cone of shame for you.ThatNickGuy said:Charlie Bartlett: Surprisingly good teen comedy and really well written. Parts of it drag a bit, but it really makes up for it with the last 30 minutes or so. Totally recommend it.
Growing Op: An indy Canadian flick filmed in Moncton, New Brunswick. Only reason I watched this is because my roommate had a minor part in it (if you watch it, he's the emo kid that the main character befriends). It was...okay. Some of the dialogue was great, most of it was pretty awful and the conclusion makes me think the kid learned absolutely NOTHING from the events of the movie.
Up: Once again, Pixar amazes me again. At this point, with their track record, I'll never miss any of their movies. Up was absolutely amaz---
SQUIRREL!
Love Dark City. Has anyone seen the director's cut version? I know there's one out there, but I haven't seen it.twitchmoss said:just watched dark city. freaking loved it. the design of the film, the music, the lot. so very awesome.
'do you know how to get to shell beach?'
I'm going to see both of these very soon! Excited for both. My roommate just bought the director's cut version.Alex B. said:Love Dark City. Has anyone seen the director's cut version? I know there's one out there, but I haven't seen it.
Away We Go - this was a pretty solid film about parenting and family with good performances and directing. A few really great scenes, with the rest being just good enough to hold your attention. Not a fantastic movie, but maybe worth a rental if that's your thing.
The directors cut is amazing. What was a really good movie becomes great. It feels like a completely different movie. Scenes that were a little vague gain clarity and some scenes gain depth they didn't have before.Alex B. said:Love Dark City. Has anyone seen the director's cut version? I know there's one out there, but I haven't seen it.
Was that the Ethan Hawke version... yeah, that was pretty unbearable. The only reason Romeo and Juliet was successful with it's modern re-imagining was due to the stunning visuals that Baz Luhrman can produce.JCM said:Macbeth
Okay, he has guns? Must not... fall... asleep. Really fell asleep in the first 15 mins.
I went out and bought REPO! the day I watched it on rental. I just HAD to own it that minute. Glad it's getting some views.Cajungal said:Saw REPO! tonight while babysitting... AFTER the kid was asleep. I can safely say it's the only thing that has anything to do with Paris Hilton I've ever been able to enjoy. Fun, weird, dark movie with a good cast and pretty good music. Didn't care for all of it, but it was definitely an interesting watch.
I'd recommend it if you like weird culty stuff. That one guy from Buffy's in it... the guy who made me enjoy the show for a few precious moments. Glasses man. Yes, him!
There is nothing serious about that movieKrisken said:I saw Hamlet 2. The first 1/4 or so I fought to keep watching, but it gets seriously funny.
Because they win in the movies?Aisaku said:I still don't get how they send foot soldiers against walking tanks, I guess I never will.
Because the movie is a commercial for our struggling armed forcesAisaku said:I still don't get how they send foot soldiers against walking tanks, I guess I never will.
I keep hearing this, yet have yet to watch it....Mr. Lawface said:Shoot 'em Up is awesome.
There is a simple way to remedy this.Shegokigo said:I keep hearing this, yet have yet to watch it....Mr. Lawface said:Shoot 'em Up is awesome.
There is a simple way to remedy this.[/quote:1hgdjvh5]Mr. Lawface said:I keep hearing this, yet have yet to watch it....Shegokigo said:[quote="Mr. Lawface":1hgdjvh5]Shoot 'em Up is awesome.
There is a simple way to remedy this.[/quote:14zablsx]Le Quack said:[quote="Mr. Lawface":14zablsx]I keep hearing this, yet have yet to watch it....Shegokigo said:[quote="Mr. Lawface":14zablsx]Shoot 'em Up is awesome.
You're not the only one that feels that way:ThatNickGuy said:Knowing
Well...the first half was pretty good. Special effects were surprisingly good. And I was actually into the plot at first.
*sigh* At first.
Then, it all went to crap by the second half with the big revelation of the final prediction. Of course, Cage was...his usual self, though I was able to stomach him this time.
Just...wow. Let's just say this: I got it for free from work and...well, I got my money's worth.
Wow. That's...pretty much my play-by-play thought process right there. At first, I was intrigued enough to think that it might not be such a bad movie, afterall.ElJuski said:You're not the only one that feels that way:
http://www.avclub.com/articles/knowing,29842/
Troll much?Charlie Dont Surf said:Because the movie is a commercial for our struggling armed forcesAisaku said:I still don't get how they send foot soldiers against walking tanks, I guess I never will.
Great freakin film. Introduced me to Sam Rockwell and taught me that Tony Shalhoub and Tim Allen aren't just one trick ponies.ThatNickGuy said:Galaxy Quest
Just re-watched this tonight to get the bad taste of Knowing out of my mouth. What a difference. It was fun, over the top and didn't take itself seriously. If I can find it somewhere cheap (which I'm sure I can), I think I'll see about buying this at some point. Such a blast.
Tony Shalhoub, I've known was more than a one trick pony long before Galaxy Quest came along. He was in the show Wings, Men in Black, Monk... No character in any of them was remotely the same.Shegokigo said:Great freakin film. Introduced me to Sam Rockwell and taught me that Tony Shalhoub and Tim Allen aren't just one trick ponies.ThatNickGuy said:Galaxy Quest
Just re-watched this tonight to get the bad taste of Knowing out of my mouth. What a difference. It was fun, over the top and didn't take itself seriously. If I can find it somewhere cheap (which I'm sure I can), I think I'll see about buying this at some point. Such a blast.
Not to mention his work with the Coens and Stanley Tucci-as-director.Bowielee said:Tony Shalhoub, I've known was more than a one trick pony long before Galaxy Quest came along. He was in the show Wings, Men in Black, Monk... No character in any of them was remotely the same.
I generally could care less if some one does not do an accent in a movie, unless they are speaking the language in question. The question should be why did they not speak German for the whole movie? Only two people bothered to do an accent for their roles, and they were German Actors speaking English.ElJuski said:Oh god, I hated Valkyrie, and I forgot all about it until you just brought it up Nobody even tried to get a German accent right, from what I remember. I also remember that it should have been called "Tom Cruise Does History!" for how shallowly he jumped into his character. I will agree seeing something else from WW2 was interesting. If it's not the US Comes to Save the Day, its about the horrors of the Holocaust. Not saying the Holocaust wasn't a horrible thing, but there are different genocides / angles to take World War 2.
The accents weren't the point. They even illustrate what they were going for with the switch from German to English. I agree with Tom Cruise being one of the weak points of the movie though.ElJuski said:Oh god, I hated Valkyrie, and I forgot all about it until you just brought it up Nobody even tried to get a German accent right, from what I remember. I also remember that it should have been called "Tom Cruise Does History!" for how shallowly he jumped into his character. I will agree seeing something else from WW2 was interesting. If it's not the US Comes to Save the Day, its about the horrors of the Holocaust. Not saying the Holocaust wasn't a horrible thing, but there are different genocides / angles to take World War 2.
Hurp Durr Derp.PhantomShadow said:Hey but all the main protagonists die at the end of the film so it wasn't all that bad.
Chippy said:Hurp Durr Derp.PhantomShadow said:Hey but all the main protagonists die at the end of the film so it wasn't all that bad.
Welp, now everyone around me thinks I'm crazy for laughing so hard.Shegokigo said:Chippy said:Hurp Durr Derp.PhantomShadow said:Hey but all the main protagonists die at the end of the film so it wasn't all that bad.
Yes. It seemed like every 5 minutes someone new was introduced, for 140 minutes straight. I just kinda stopped caring about a lot of the characters because of it. I want to watch it again just so I can get everyone straight. I really did like it, but like others have said it could have been a lot better.Alex B. said:Public Enemies - needed a way tighter screenplay. A lot of time was spent on (historically inaccurate) cameos of famous criminals of the day instead of developing the main characters and plot. Just ends up being generally disasisfying. Also, there were some weird sound issues.
Still, Mann knows how to shoot a gunfight, and I have a thing for the general look of that time period. I don't regret seeing it, but I can't recommend it.
I'd love for Mel Gibson to do Valkyrie, because Hitler speaking English takes too much away from the experience, and he knows how to casts unknowns who can pull off complicated roles.Frankie said:The accents weren't the point. They even illustrate what they were going for with the switch from German to English. I agree with Tom Cruise being one of the weak points of the movie though.ElJuski said:Oh god, I hated Valkyrie, and I forgot all about it until you just brought it up Nobody even tried to get a German accent right, from what I remember. I also remember that it should have been called "Tom Cruise Does History!" for how shallowly he jumped into his character. I will agree seeing something else from WW2 was interesting. If it's not the US Comes to Save the Day, its about the horrors of the Holocaust. Not saying the Holocaust wasn't a horrible thing, but there are different genocides / angles to take World War 2.
That was indeed a terrible movie....with one exception. The laser hallway. That actually freaked me out. It failed my "Batman Test", and even failed it explicitly by having a Batman-like character bite it.Bubble181 said:Resident Evil.
...Yeah, not too much great about that one. Not enough action to be an action movie, not a single scene that even got me to blink so definitely not any subgenre of horror, not enough story to qualify as drama or thriller, and if there were any jokes, I didn't see them. Some nice visuals, but all in all, nah. Milla Jovovich's character reminded me a lot of [spoiler:39ivoiwg]River Tam in Serenity, as contrasted to her character in Firefly[/spoiler:39ivoiwg]. And, as odd as it may be, I'm not actually a great fan of that kind of character.
This the best way to look at the series:fade said:That was indeed a terrible movie....with one exception. The laser hallway. That actually freaked me out. It failed my "Batman Test", and even failed it explicitly by having a Batman-like character bite it.
Please, do explain, I feel those critiques were very much in order.Frankie said:That's giving a lot of credit to it.
I care to disagree, there were alot of great action scenes in that film. If they'd have taken out the name "Resident Evil" and made it some nameless corporation doing the evil deeds, it would have been fantastic action/zombie flick.Charlie Dont Surf said:There was nothing good about Resident Evil 2.
We are all expendable.Charlie Dont Surf said:There was nothing good about Resident Evil 2.
I'm pretty sure I didn't say it was a well scripted movie.Shannow said:We are all expendable.Charlie Dont Surf said:There was nothing good about Resident Evil 2.
...And we have just been expended.
Ahh opinons, how they can differ so:Shannow said:It weas a bad movie. tried to input humor that was not funny, horror that did not scare, gore that was meh, bad scripting, action sequences that made me jsut not care. So, everythign it tried to acieve, it failed at with me, so I am going with bad movie.
Like I said, different tastes.Charlie Dont Surf said:The name "Resident Evil" or any expectations had no effect on me since I've never played any of those games.
How was it a good zombie movie? A buddy of mine said it best, "When a zombie movie needs Milla Jovovich's naked bits to hit that R rating, something is wrong."Shegokigo said:Resident Evil 1: bad video game movie, a bad action movie, but a good zombie movie.
How was it a good zombie movie? Was it the part where she crashed through the church in a motorbike, did a bunch of flips and shot all the non-zombies? I also really liked the fist fight with Nemesis.....God I hated that movie.Resident Evil 2:bad video game movie, a good action movie, and a good zombie movie.
Infinite. Zombie. Train car.Resident Evil 3: good video game movie, a bad action movie and a bad zombie movie.
Shegokigo said:Like I said, different tastes.Charlie Dont Surf said:The name "Resident Evil" or any expectations had no effect on me since I've never played any of those games.
Also, it's no surprise, we hardly ever see eye to eye on almost any subject. So pretty much if I dislike/like something, I can pretty much count on you to feel the opposite. Which pretty much goes for Krisken, Kissinger and Shannow as well.
Good zombie movie = lots and lots of zombies, people getting eaten left and right and people fighting for their lives, toss in a little gore, some nakedness, and a nice finish with only 1-2 survivors.Frankie said:How was it a good zombie movie? A buddy of mine said it best, "When a zombie movie needs Milla Jovovich's naked bits to hit that R rating, something is wrong."Shegokigo said:Resident Evil 1: bad video game movie, a bad action movie, but a good zombie movie.
Obviously you've forgotten the entire schoolhouse scene and the city wide buffet.Frankie said:How was it a good zombie movie? Was it the part where she crashed through the church in a motorbike, did a bunch of flips and shot all the non-zombies? I also really liked the fist fight with Nemesis.....God I hated that movie.Shegokigo said:Resident Evil 2:bad video game movie, a good action movie, and a good zombie movie.
"Good video game movie"Frankie said:Shegokigo said:Infinite. Zombie. Train car.Resident Evil 3: good video game movie, a bad action movie and a bad zombie movie.
Congrats on your anniversary! Man... movie dates are our favorite. We have a huge box of ticket stubs... well, he does. I'm not sentimental enough to keep a bunch of stuff lying around.Lally said:Today was my 4-year anniversary with my boyfriend, and we had never gone on a date to the movies before (he hates going to the movies for various reasons) so we went to a 10 AM showing of The Hangover and were the only two in the theatre. It was hilarious!
That's what I like to do. I'm always surrounded by retired couples. It's great... they never make noise or text during the movie.Shegokigo said:Lally - Four years and it's your FIRST movie date? Wow....
As for not liking the crowded movie, you should do what you did more often. It's exactly what I do. Go see a film the morning of Tuesday or Wednesday after it's released. Never have been to a movie with more than 2-3 people.
Cajungal said:Her boyfriend kept mumbling, "Come on, don't be THAT girl in the theater..."
What did you think of Jeffery Donovan's(the main police guy) accent.ThatNickGuy said:Changeling
Really great, if maybe too long, movie. Some pretty good acting from Jolie, though maybe a bit too much screaming. Still, it gets REALLY dark about halfway through the movie, when we find out where her kidnapped son went to. And the setting for the late 20s/early 30s was pulled of great, with some fantastic costumes and set design.
I was too busy grinding my teeth and trying not to leap into the TV and strangle him, myself, to notice an accent or not.Charlie Dont Surf said:What did you think of Jeffery Donovan's(the main police guy) accent.
Cajungal said:I liked Changeling...it WAS long though. I thought it ended twice before it actually ended... just like the last LOTR movie.
I saw 12 Rounds the other day, with some wrestling guy as the lead. I rent a lot of action movies when I want something to work out to--lots of running and explosions and stuff that makes it easier to be energetic... But I don't think I'll be watching it again.
[spoiler:grt3m37m]At the beginning of the movie, the main character is painted as this good, sympathetic cop. He's kind of tormented by the fact that a criminal's girlfriend was killed the night he caught him. But people keep dying left and right in the movie, and he doesn't seem to feel that bad about it... at all, really--even his partner/best friend who spends the whole movie helping him.[/spoiler:grt3m37m]
The last line is this awful wisecrack that's kind of jerks you out of the movie experience. I think I actually said, "wait, what???" out loud.
Took place in New Orleans... lotta references to Katrina. And a lot of cracks at the "big mean FBI."
There's this big "let's go home" moment with him and his girlfriend, who was kidnapped.Bumble the Boy Wonder said:...What was the last line??
Oooooo, I forgot that one!Charlie Dont Surf said:I thought the ending one liner you were referring to was "YOU LOSE!"
I thought it worked because it showed her as naked and vulnerable and hit home the parallel about both characters relying on their older body to survive.drawn_inward said:I know she's a stripper, and all, but it kind of cheapens the movie to me.
I think Sam Raimi definitively proved he's one of a only a handful of filmmakers that can pull off a PG-13 horror movie without it seeming neutered.Shegokigo said:Only things missing was an R rating, some nudity
Good movie? Sure. Missing some nudity? Definitely.Charlie Dont Surf said:I think Sam Raimi definitively proved he's one of a only a handful of filmmakers that can pull off a PG-13 horror movie without it seeming neutered.Shegokigo said:Only things missing was an R rating, some nudity
BAHAHAHAHA...I love the pregnant lizard man. He has the stupidest laugh. Me and my friends make that laugh from time...to time.Shegokigo said:[/spoiler]
Enemy Mine - Still one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies of the 80s. Just every single aspect was great. It holds well over time (sans the effects). Glad it came up on Instant Watch on my Netflix que.
I thought it worked because it showed her as naked and vulnerable and hit home the parallel about both characters relying on their older body to survive.[/quote:iqs0iuar]Charlie Dont Surf said:[quote="drawn_inward":iqs0iuar]I know she's a stripper, and all, but it kind of cheapens the movie to me.
Just watched it, too! It was funnier than expected. I agree on the Old School comment. Zach Gali-whatever was great. His part just kept getting funnier as the movie progressed. This scene made me laugh out loud.fade said:I just saw The Hangover. I thought it was funny and clever. It actually had some nice film moments, too. The decent camerawork added to the humor. Strangely, I thought Old School was boring and predictable, but this was pretty good.
Something like this:fade said:I need to find a screen capture of Phil in his work clothes. I could rock that look, but I don't remember it very precisely.
I laughed pretty hard when I realized it resembled Mr.T's laugh.ElJuski said:BAHAHAHAHA...I love the pregnant lizard man. He has the stupidest laugh. Me and my friends make that laugh from time...to time.
Zamis get 4 5 fingers?ElJuski said:BAHAHAHAHA...I love the pregnant lizard man. He has the stupidest laugh. Me and my friends make that laugh from time...to time.Shegokigo said:[/spoiler]
Enemy Mine - Still one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies of the 80s. Just every single aspect was great. It holds well over time (sans the effects). Glad it came up on Instant Watch on my Netflix que.
fade said:Zamis get 4 5 fingers?
Charlie Dont Surf said:But at least talented leads Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher are able to breathe life into the normally boring stereoty......
I saw 10 minutes of it and believe me, you aren't wrong.ElJuski said:Not having seen that movie, I can safely say it follows the usual Romantic Comedy formula to a Tee.
What a beautiful torture.Cajungal said:Oh, damn. What Happens in Vegas played all the way on my trip to the UK. :waah:
Yeah, 10 minutes was more than enough for me.Cajungal said:Oh, damn. What Happens in Vegas played all the way on my trip to the UK. :waah:
I got horribly painful cramps in my calves that night. They told me it was the long flight... I knew it was the movie.Shegokigo said:What a beautiful torture.Cajungal said:Oh, damn. What Happens in Vegas played all the way on my trip to the UK. :waah:
I haven't seen this movie since I was a little kid and I remember about 2% of it... I added it to my Netflix as soon as I saw it. I was like "EEEE!" I haven't watched it yet though... been trying to marathon my way through Ghost In The Shell Stand Alone Complex before the second season goes off Instant Queue on the 14th.Shegokigo said:Enemy Mine - Still one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies of the 80s. Just every single aspect was great. It holds well over time (sans the effects). Glad it came up on Instant Watch on my Netflix que.
Too bad it made about $4.ThatNickGuy said:Push
Just a really cool action flick. Not a whole lot in the way of character depth or development, but still a really neat concept. Psychic powers left, right and center made it totally wicked. I think I heard the intention was to turn it into a franchise and I'd be down for that.
Primer made my head hurt for like, a couple weeks.Lally said:I haven't seen this movie since I was a little kid and I remember about 2% of it... I added it to my Netflix as soon as I saw it. I was like "EEEE!" I haven't watched it yet though... been trying to marathon my way through Ghost In The Shell Stand Alone Complex before the second season goes off Instant Queue on the 14th.Shegokigo said:Enemy Mine - Still one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies of the 80s. Just every single aspect was great. It holds well over time (sans the effects). Glad it came up on Instant Watch on my Netflix que.
To stay relevant to the thread, my boyfriend and I watched Primer the other night. It's an independent sci-fi film made on a budget of $7000. Lots of math/engineering talk, lots of talking in general... it was interesting because they explained a lot of the science behind what they were doing. (People on Netflix, it's on Instant Queue if you're interested)
This movie was such a pleasant surprise for me.escushion said:I'm watching The Mist right now. Holy crap...
:eyeroll:SeraRelm said:How?
As in, how was it pleasant when you had to sludge your way through every standard trope character King puts in almost all his books?
[spoiler:252azy1t]The end of the movie, with him and his assistant making out in the middle of the barbed wire MMA ring with people flipping out killed me. Especially that really intense redneck that was just screaming NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!![/spoiler:252azy1t] I really enjoyed the fucking shit out Bruno. I loved that half the theatre (mostly old people) got up and walked out after the TV screening bit. What the fuck did people expect? Seriously?ElJuski said:Primer made my head hurt for like, a couple weeks.Lally said:I haven't seen this movie since I was a little kid and I remember about 2% of it... I added it to my Netflix as soon as I saw it. I was like "EEEE!" I haven't watched it yet though... been trying to marathon my way through Ghost In The Shell Stand Alone Complex before the second season goes off Instant Queue on the 14th.Shegokigo said:Enemy Mine - Still one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies of the 80s. Just every single aspect was great. It holds well over time (sans the effects). Glad it came up on Instant Watch on my Netflix que.
To stay relevant to the thread, my boyfriend and I watched Primer the other night. It's an independent sci-fi film made on a budget of $7000. Lots of math/engineering talk, lots of talking in general... it was interesting because they explained a lot of the science behind what they were doing. (People on Netflix, it's on Instant Queue if you're interested)
I just saw Bruno; Cohen does his thing, and I don't mind it. I think Borat is a better character, but Bruno was funny too. I'm excited now for what new character he is going to scheme up and hit the world with.
That was my favorite bit, that they didn't cop out on the ending, Cujo style.escushion said:Okay, wow... That ending...
I can understand that it needed some more finality than the novella, but holy shit. I don't know if that was really necessary. Still a good horror movie, but that was just... Yeesh.
And it didn't even have any tits!Shegokigo said:The Mist had my favorite ending in a movie since Seven. No question.
Point, but I don't think Cujo was that great a book or movie, although I did give props to King for the book's ending.Krisken said:That was my favorite bit, that they didn't cop out on the ending, Cujo style.escushion said:Okay, wow... That ending...
I can understand that it needed some more finality than the novella, but holy shit. I don't know if that was really necessary. Still a good horror movie, but that was just... Yeesh.
Hence I said favorite "ending", Not film. It doesn't even rank on my top 30.Charlie Dont Surf said:And it didn't even have any tits!Shegokigo said:The Mist had my favorite ending in a movie since Seven. No question.
Loved that. It was the one scene in which I actually liked Pitt, which didn't happen again till Snatch.ElJuski said:WHATS IN THE BOX!? AWWW CMOONNNN WHATS IN THE BOX
My buddy and I who saw Bruno were laughing as hard at the people leaving in a huff as much as we were at the movie itself.fade said:Ugg. Big sign on the theater windows: "No more refunds for Bruno. Movie is about...etc." Why'd they give any? If you can't be bothered to find out what a movie is about before you go, you deserve the rude awakening. After Borat, should it really have been a surprise anyway? And why do I keep seeing kids (like 4-10 y.o.) at R rated movies?
I didn't find it as good as you, but that might just be because they almost ruined B.Beyond by making Terry Bruce's genetic son instead of going the logical way and just having WW's daughter show up... JLU continuity FTW.Shegokigo said:Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker - Finally got my GF to sit down and watch, she's not exactly a huge comic book/western animation fan, but this to me, is the best Batman movie made (animation/live action). In the end she said "Wow, just wow. That took me completely by surprise. I didn't see the twist coming at all and it was very original." she gave it a thumbs up and I'm going to use this opportunity to show her Mask of the Phantasm.
I never watched the B.Beyond series. So there you go.@Li3n said:I didn't find it as good as you, but that might just be because they almost ruined B.Beyond by making Terry Bruce's genetic son instead of going the logical way and just having WW's daughter show up... JLU continuity FTW.Shegokigo said:Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker - Finally got my GF to sit down and watch, she's not exactly a huge comic book/western animation fan, but this to me, is the best Batman movie made (animation/live action). In the end she said "Wow, just wow. That took me completely by surprise. I didn't see the twist coming at all and it was very original." she gave it a thumbs up and I'm going to use this opportunity to show her Mask of the Phantasm.
That really has nothing to do with the quality of the movie, but with JLU continuity. It's easily ignorable info.@Li3n said:I didn't find it as good as you, but that might just be because they almost ruined B.Beyond by making Terry Bruce's genetic son instead of going the logical way and just having WW's daughter show up... JLU continuity FTW.Shegokigo said:Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker - Finally got my GF to sit down and watch, she's not exactly a huge comic book/western animation fan, but this to me, is the best Batman movie made (animation/live action). In the end she said "Wow, just wow. That took me completely by surprise. I didn't see the twist coming at all and it was very original." she gave it a thumbs up and I'm going to use this opportunity to show her Mask of the Phantasm.
A coworker got me stoked for that one a while ago. It's one I'll unfortunately have to wait to hit the DVD shelves as nothing in "select" theatres ever comes near here.Kissinger said:The Hurt Locker is the best film of the year so far. It is the first great film of 2009, and it is the film in which Kathryn Bigelow finally materializes as a great filmmaker.
The Coen Bros. have a fantastic understanding of dark, dry comedy, and Burn After Reading is so cynically delicious. Brad Pitt's character was excellent. Loved how nihillistic it all was.Krisken said:I just finished watching Burn After Reading.
Wow, just wow. There is no way I can talk about this movie without giving stuff away, and that would be very unfair to anyone who hasn't seen it.
I will say the ending was hilarious. Movie starts slow, kinda grinds, then about halfway it all starts to tie together. Fucking brilliant.
Shegokigo said:Loved Malkovich in it.
Hated Pitt.
Overall, it was "ok".
I didn't get that vibe off this character at all. He quite literally plays a moron. In fact, most of the people in it are playing morons.Chazwozel said:Shegokigo said:Loved Malkovich in it.
Hated Pitt.
Overall, it was "ok".
Brad Pitt has been perpetually stuck in Fight Club mode ever since that movie came out. Every movie after that seems like he's the know it all, rebellious, snarky Tyler Durden.
:blue:Chazwozel said:Shegokigo said:Loved Malkovich in it.
Hated Pitt.
Overall, it was "ok".
Brad Pitt has been perpetually stuck in Fight Club mode ever since that movie came out. Every movie after that seems like he's the know it all, rebellious, snarky Tyler Durden.
Everyone but Malcovich, he shined in his role. Everyonelse pulled off "moron" perfectly too. Pitt came off as annoying and "trying too hard".Krisken said:I didn't get that vibe off this character at all. He quite literally plays a moron. In fact, most of the people in it are playing morons.
Krisken said:I didn't get that vibe off this character at all. He quite literally plays a moron. In fact, most of the people in it are playing morons.Chazwozel said:Shegokigo said:Loved Malkovich in it.
Hated Pitt.
Overall, it was "ok".
Brad Pitt has been perpetually stuck in Fight Club mode ever since that movie came out. Every movie after that seems like he's the know it all, rebellious, snarky Tyler Durden.
Agreed on Malkovich.Shegokigo said:Everyone but Malcovich, he shined in his role. Everyonelse pulled off "moron" perfectly too. Pitt came off as annoying and "trying too hard".Krisken said:I didn't get that vibe off this character at all. He quite literally plays a moron. In fact, most of the people in it are playing morons.
Easily my favorite parts in the film, though sadly few and far between.Krisken said:The CIA scenes with J.K. Simmons and David Rasche was absolutely perfect. It showed how stupidity can utterly confuse and befuddle intelligent people.
Beautiful way of putting it Juski, just nailed it.ElJuski said:About Malkovich: He was absolutely awesome in his role, too. The distempter that just simmered, then boiled, beneath his skin. He was funny, freaky, terrifying all at once.
Agreed on both counts. Also interesting is how John's character slowly falls apart through the movie. Everyone else in the movie who is affected has things happen to them in huge crashes, while he faces slow deterioration.Shegokigo said:Easily my favorite parts in the film, though sadly few and far between.Krisken said:The CIA scenes with J.K. Simmons and David Rasche was absolutely perfect. It showed how stupidity can utterly confuse and befuddle intelligent people.
Beautiful way of putting it Juski, just nailed it.ElJuski said:About Malkovich: He was absolutely awesome in his role, too. The distempter that just simmered, then boiled, beneath his skin. He was funny, freaky, terrifying all at once.
Didn't see it, but that might make the movie interesting.Charlie Dont Surf said:Pitt was awesome in Fight Club and Burn After Reading, and the characters were completely different.
And yes, Pitt was acting just like Tyler Durden in Benjamin Button too.
Charlie Dont Surf said:And yes, Pitt was acting just like Tyler Durden in Benjamin Button too.
It was the good kind of "dull" though, I thought at least.Krisken said:Didn't see it, but that might make the movie interesting.
From what I hear, it was dull as hell.
The great Dick Jenkins, Oscar nominated last year for his performance in the woefully under-seen film The VisitorElJuski said:One of the weaker links in a great cast, I think. Still thoroughly enjoyed his character, though. Also, the manager. What's his name?
Yes, although it is not at all necessary to enjoy the film. But the novel is wonderful and worth reading, and you'll appreciate the movie more (both thematically and visually), I think.Shegokigo said:Would you recommend someone to read the novel first?
Agreed. It wavers around a lot after the train but then again I think that's the idea there they were looking for something big, something important, something illuminating. And at the end they came to realize what they were looking for was already within their reach, only overlooked until now.Philosopher B. said:Watched The Darjeeling Limited. I dunno, some bits were good, but after they got off the train, everything seemed to meander a bit too much for my liking. Though I've only ever seen one other Wes Anderson film (The Life Aquatic), I preferred what it got done in terms of story and characters. This movie just left me feeling vaguely unfulfilled.
The two old women, the mouse trainer, and the talking cat were all in the book. The boy who rode the bike was not in the book.ThatNickGuy said:I don't believe there were other neighbours, such as the two old women and the Russian...or the talking cat, although there might've been a talking cat in the book, too. As I said, very rusty.
Wow. I can understand hyping this movie up a lot because it is really great, but whoever told you that it was the most incredible animated movie ever made is deluding themselves.ZenMonkey said:Finally saw Princess Mononoke (subtitled). I enjoyed it very much but I think the hype got to me just a bit as it wasn't, you know, the most incredible animated movie ever released in the history of cinema.
Yeah, the sound design, art direction, and score were all fantastic. I love the art direction especially because the space Sam occupies really felt lived in. It wasn't clean and shiny, but dirty. That's a tough thing to pull off in a manufactured space. The station felt utilitarian, as it should. It was a real "working class" sort of vision of space and science fiction where it wasn't glamorized at all. I really liked the movie and felt like it could stand up next to the really great science fiction of the seventies which it is definitely recalling.Far said:Saw Moon today and loved it. I had a bit different idea as to how I thought the movie would play out at first but I wasn't at all disappointed by how it actually ended up. Sound direction was phenomenal too.
Name 2 animated films more completely and thoroughly better than Mononoke. I'm not saying it's the greatest film ever either, but I do have trouble thinking of better ones off the top of my head.Kissinger said:Wow. I can understand hyping this movie up a lot because it is really great, but whoever told you that it was the most incredible animated movie ever made is deluding themselves.
Beauty and The BeastShegokigo said:Name 2 animated films more completely and thoroughly better than Mononoke. I'm not saying it's the greatest film ever either, but I do have trouble thinking of better ones off the top of my head.
Your first one just makes meKissinger said:Beauty and The Beast
Spirited Away
Want more than 2?
Laugh all you want, but Beauty and the Beast was nominated for an Academy Award for best picture.Shegokigo said:Your first one just makes meKissinger said:Beauty and The Beast
Spirited Away
Want more than 2?
Second one I'd considered tied.
If you'd like to list more I'm all ears. This is genuine curiousity, as one of the films that comes to mind that I prefer is "Metropolis".
*shrug* Didn't find it the least bit amazing/entertaining.Bowielee said:Laugh all you want, but Beauty and the Beast was nominated for an Academy Award for best picture.
Just double checked. It was the ONLY animated feature to be nominated for Best Picture.
That's because after Beauty and the Beast, the academy created the best animated film category, so that no more of those lousy 'cartoons' would be poking their nose in with the 'real' films again.Bowielee said:Just double checked. It was the ONLY animated feature to be nominated for Best Picture.
Beauty and the Beast was fairly groundbreaking in a few ways, and there isn't a bad scene in the entire thing. It's gorgeous to look at, has great characters, the music is entertaining and drives the story (essential for a musical). It's a beautiful story that has been told over and over again, and this is a great retelling. It's my favorite Disney movie.Shegokigo said:Your first one just makes me
Second one I'd considered tied.
If you'd like to list more I'm all ears. This is genuine curiousity, as one of the films that comes to mind that I prefer is "Metropolis".
Nah, the real reason they added that category is so that they could honor and draw attention to MORE animated films, and give animated films in general higher honors than they would normally get. Unfortunately for the Academy, since then, Pixar has started making movies that have sort of languished in Best Animated purgatory, sort of undoing what the Academy really wanted to do with that category.Ravenpoe said:That's because after Beauty and the Beast, the academy created the best animated film category, so that no more of those lousy 'cartoons' would be poking their nose in with the 'real' films again
I just watched this one last night myself. I thought it had promise, and wasn't terrible, but overall could have been considerably better. I couldn't give a hoot one way or the other on Dakota Fanning, she's neither impressive nor horrid. As such I actually feel she fit well with the movie, as I said, it was neither impressive nor horrid itself.BlackCat said:Saw Push seemed like an interesting premise even though I still don't care for Dakota Fanning as an actress.
It wasn't just one person, it's the whole mystique around the movie. I totally agree with you about Spirited Away. It got me more on a gut level than Princess Mononoke, but I can't really decide objectively which one is "better."Kissinger said:Wow. I can understand hyping this movie up a lot because it is really great, but whoever told you that it was the most incredible animated movie ever made is deluding themselves.
That's exactly how I felt about it. A movie that works better as 3 short movies but are connected in their own way. When I do finally pick it up, that is how I plan to watch it, one section at a time.JCM said:Sin City ... shouldve been three short movies, together it seems too much of a love letter from Frank Miller to himself.
Yessssssssss that movie is so good. Great, great performances and writing.ZenMonkey said:Today I finally saw In Bruges. Excellent.
Very strange. I enjoyed both the Constantine books AND the movie. They were just different takes on the character I thought. They never touted it as a "comic book" movie either.fade said:For instance, I never read Constantine, but one of my best friends loved it. She HATED the movie. I actually thought it was entertaining. When I read about the differences on Wikipedia, I could see her point, but I still enjoyed the movie for what it was.
When I first saw the LOTR movies at the theatre I was wowed with how almost dead-on to the novels they were, I enjoyed the films throughly but was left with "they could have added a few more things"...... then I bought the extended edition DVDs.Cajungal said:One thing I'm very grateful for is that I don't see Ian McKellan and Elijah Wood's faces as I'm reading LOTR right now. I can certainly see why fans of the book would have liked to have Tom Bombadil in there now.
I used to let differences between the book and movie get to me. I still get a little peeved sometimes depending on how much I love the book, I suppose, but it's just impossible to fit everything into a film.
I would recommend the extended edition DVDs, they really bring out Sam alot more than he was represented in theatres. The Faramir thing though, can't help ya.fade said:I can deal with the Bombadil thing. There are two major points that I didn't like about the the movies (well three if you count the constantly crying hobbits). One was Faramir (like everyone else). What the hell? The whole point of that scene was removed. Might as well have cut it. And 2: the treatment of Sam. He should've been a stronger character. Like others, I've always felt Sam was the hidden protagonist, and Frodo was the foil. They stripped him down, especially in his big scene: the passage into Mordor. I hated that. Had Frodo kick him out. He was tempted by the ring--his exploits with the orcs reduced to dumb luck... that really really weakened that scene. Oh yeah, did I mention the crying hobbits? Because the hobbits cry a lot in the movies.
I don't know what it says about the movies, but I saw the LOTR's in theater. Then bought the nice book-looking DVDs that are all extended, and then never watched them again. The most I've done is joke about trying to watch them all in a row without going to the bathroom.Cajungal said:I have NEVER sat down and watched the extended DVDs! That should be one of my summer goals? Are they good?