Yea.......... KindaIs Tron actually in the movie?
Does he yell "GRAAAAAH!" every 15 minutes like he did in the original?I found the 3D to be a bit underwhelming. Not bad, but not really immersive.
And CGI Bridges was very well done.
Yea... kindaThe wikipedia article indicates that he is in the new movie, and plays an important role.
I hope so, I was kind of disappointed with the way he went out as well.I think they didn't cover what happened to him on purpose. I smell another possible movie after this.
Add in having to protect the grid from evil interests in the real world (maybe Dillinger's son and the head of the ENCOM board) and you've got a movie. They're also planning an animated series, and Bruce Boxleitner hasn't been super busy the last few years.....it would be nice if the show followed Tron trying to dismantle Clu's regime. A relative 1,000 years passed in The Grid during the 20 years Flynn was trapped according to what I read, so the time difference would more than account for The Grid being very different by a sequel.I'm pretty sure I read online that this was conceptualized to be a two-parter (dualogy?).
And I'm just going to speculate wildly and with much abandon that the next film will focus on Tron running the grid and trying to resurrect/reassemble Kevin Flynn.
I believe the concept in play here is called a "sequel hook", sir.Oh yeah... speaking of Dillingers son, nice minute and a half of screen time there Cillian.
Can't say as I disagree. Maybe just a shout out then. "Rinzler" not derezzing is a better sequel hook anyways.If so it was a pretty shitty way to implement one.
I saw the review Spoony posted, which, while nitpicky, brought up some things I didn't think of before. I still think it was a really fun time in the theatre, though.Tron: Legacy
Re-watched the original last night, saw the new one today (in 3D). Overall, I had a fun time. I saw a review (on io9 or something) which said the movie ripped off the Matrix, which was funny, because when I re-watched the original movie I thought 'Damn, Flynn is basically Neo.' I thought any Matrix-like aspects were pretty much in keeping with the spirit of the original.
Obviously the two biggest immediate pluses were the visuals and the score by Daft Punk. One thing that kinda makes me scratch my head, though, is that they spent a cool 200 mill on this baby. Obviously, if it's Tron, you want good effects (what with the original being an experimental milestone in that area), but I honestly wonder how much potential there is for recouping/profiting on top of that? I mean, I always saw the original Tron as a bit of a cult classic.
Olivia Wilde was awesome. She brought a fantastic quirky innocence to her role. Bridges was fun to watch, even if he felt a bit less Flynn and a bit more Dude. The main guy wasn't amazing but I didn't think he was terrible either.
The main problem was vagueness of areas of the plot, and half-thought through concepts. I think I will have to see the movie at least a second time to completely solidify my opinion of its merits overall.
I also thought some of the conversations/plot exposition got a bit long-winded. I'm curious as to what this film would be like to someone who never saw the first?
Also? I would totally sit through a movie solely based on Castor. He was just awesome for every moment he was onscreen.
IMO it looked a bit too realistic (and they used too many real props), and i like my virtual worlds to be a bit more obviously virtual...Saw it last night. Visually, I was blown away.