Australia intends to introduce filters which will ban access to websites containing criminal content.
The banned sites will be selected by an independent classification body guided by complaints from the public, said Communications Minister Stephen Conroy.
A seven month trial in conjunction with internet service providers found the technology behind the filter to be 100% effective.
However, there has been opposition from some internet users.
Twitter users have been voicing their disapproval by adding the search tag \"nocleanfeed\" to their comments about the plans.
\"Successful technology isn't necessarily successful policy,\" said Colin Jacobs, a spokesperson for Electronic Frontiers Australia, a non-profit organisation that campaigns for online freedom.
\"We're yet to hear a sensible explanation of what this policy is for, who it will help, and why it is worth spending so much taxpayers' money on.\"
Mr Conroy said the filters included optional extras such as a ban on gambling sites which ISPs could choose to implement in exchange for a grant.
\"Through a combination of additional resources for education and awareness, mandatory internet filtering of RC (refused classification)-rated content, and optional ISP-level filtering, we have a package that balances safety for families and the benefits of the digital revolution,\" he said.
The filter laws will be introduced in parliament in August 2010 and will take a year to implement.
'noble aims'
\"Historical attempts to put filters in place have been effective up to a point,\" Dr Windsor Holden, principal analyst at Juniper Research, told BBC News.
The \"noble aims\" of the filter could be lost in its implementation, he warned.
\"Clearly there is a need to protect younger and more vulnerable users of the net, but one concern is that it won't just be illegal websites that will be blocked,\" he added.
\"You have to take extreme caution in how these things are rolled out and the uses to which they're put.\"
Read the article. Looks like it'll be an ISP-side thing, so it will filter the internet before it's received by the user, by the look of it.And what are they going to do... make it illegal to have a web surfing computer without the new blocking software? What about if someone has to reformate and forgets to re-install? Are they suddenly a criminal? Honestly... did ANYONE think this through?
all betterthere is no 100% "effective" in anything
Cake is a lie!
all better[/QUOTE]there is no 100% "effective" in anything
Cake is a lie!
all better[/QUOTE]there is no 100% "effective" in anything
Cake is a lie!
all better[/QUOTE]there is no 100% "effective" in anything
Cake is a lie!
well darling, I hope you will at least ask permission first before wisk it away (plus my wife may not approve)Then someone will just sneak up on you when you are sleeping, and suck it right outta ya for their evil wicked ways!
well darling, I hope you will at least ask permission first before wisk it away (plus my wife may not approve) [/QUOTE]Then someone will just sneak up on you when you are sleeping, and suck it right outta ya for their evil wicked ways!
Heh! I'm one of the weird internet people who can be convince given the right argument. She is right in a way, that I can't protect my sperm 100% (even getting it snip there is a small chance at least it has been done before) so that disprove my statement of 100% proof anything (except 100% proof alcohol)This thread was about internet filters! Now it's about the probability of Chibibar impregnating a woman and Ame's stealing into his house "whisking" his sperm away somehow just to prove her point.
Halforums; you are weird.
well darling, I hope you will at least ask permission first before wisk it away (plus my wife may not approve) [/quote]Then someone will just sneak up on you when you are sleeping, and suck it right outta ya for their evil wicked ways!
For you maybe...well.. I never donate either (at least in real life) so my original statement holds true
Puritanical? Try authoritarian.For a country that likes to promote itself as the independent, wild west type, they sure have a puritanical streak.
Oh c'mon, which country with an indigenous minority didn't do that at one point or another?
well darling, I hope you will at least ask permission first before wisk it away (plus my wife may not approve) [/quote]Then someone will just sneak up on you when you are sleeping, and suck it right outta ya for their evil wicked ways!
For you maybe...[/QUOTE]well.. I never donate either (at least in real life) so my original statement holds true
Jesus Christ.
well darling, I hope you will at least ask permission first before wisk it away (plus my wife may not approve) [/quote]Then someone will just sneak up on you when you are sleeping, and suck it right outta ya for their evil wicked ways!
For you maybe...[/QUOTE]well.. I never donate either (at least in real life) so my original statement holds true
Oh c'mon, which country with an indigenous minority didn't do that at one point or another?[/QUOTE]