Take your smug, hipster bullshit somewhere else, asshole.I don't get the backlash. I thought Walking Dead has proven that y'all will watch literally anything with zombies in it, no matter - how bad the plot is, how uninteresting every character is, and how community theater the acting is?
keep going, I'm almost there[DOUBLEPOST=1364309757][/DOUBLEPOST]also for the record, "yall" isn't halforums, but just the buzz/internet community at large.Take your smug, hipster bullshit somewhere else, asshole.
Sure.also for the record, "yall" isn't halforums, but just the buzz/internet community at large.
That's just it, they removed all of it and made this instead.Each one of these plays off the other to create a tapestry of the human experience. You can't remove most of them and have it still work.
First of all, Charlie, thank you. *very deep, emotional hug* Because of this comment, I can finally, finally, finally say this without it being self-depreciating because...keep going, I'm almost there
Basically this. They were provided with a script that would have done justice to the source material but instead they opted to re-write the entire thing and turn it into summer block buster to make a shitload of money. When your choosing money over awards, your studio is ether on the brink of collapse or populated by idiots.That's just it, they removed all of it and made this instead.
Is the script public anywhere? I'm not asking this to troll, I'd honestly be interested in reading it.Basically this. They were provided with a script that would have done justice to the source material
Having different priorities doesn't make you an idiot. If they choose money over awards, and then make a shitload of money, they did what they wanted and succeeded.ashburnerx said:When your choosing money over awards, your studio is ether on the brink of collapse or populated by idiots.
The version I'm talking about was leaked online sometime in 2008. You want the one by J. Michael Straczynski, not the one rewritten by Matthew Michael Carnahan.Is the script public anywhere? I'm not asking this to troll, I'd honestly be interested in reading it.
Thats what you said to the driver of the car you hitchhiked in after being thrown out of the limo?First of all, Charlie, thank you. *very deep, emotional hug* Because of this comment, I can finally, finally, finally say this without it being self-depreciating because...
SOUNDS LIKE MY PROM NIGHT!
"It was, like, wow. The ending of our movie doesn't work," Evans recalled after watching a director's cut of the blockbuster hopeful. "I believed in that moment we needed to reshoot the movie."
Incomplete script, an incoherent ending, massive re-shoots, millions of dollars in budget overages, and even a Hungarian SWAT team raid are apparently just a few of the issues plaguing Pitt's troubled production
Typical Hollywood stupidity: people really love the source material for our new movie, so we decided to change everything.Too bad he didn't stick to the script of the book.
The book wasn't high literature but it was definitely a fun, compelling read in my opinion. I have no idea how you'd turn it into a movie. Obviously Pitt and company didn't either.I agree this looks terrible. I've resisted entering this discussion so far because I didn't really think much of the book either, and I know how much you guys like dissenting opinions. But geez, when you've pared your movie down to the most interesting 90 seconds and it still looks like crap, that doesn't bode well.
I've resisted entering this discussion so far because I didn't really think much of the book either... STOPPED READING CAUSE FADE
You don't. You turn it into a miniseries. But that'd never do for someone like Brad Pitt.The book wasn't high literature but it was definitely a fun, compelling read in my opinion. I have no idea how you'd turn it into a movie. Obviously Pitt and company didn't either.
Damon Lindelof.I just don't understand. They HAD a really great script by J. Michael Straczynski, which was getting some great buzz, including possible Best Picture possibilities. It was stylistically compared with Children of Men, which is pretty appropriate for the book. Now it just looks like a crap boom fest, instead of engaging character profiles and political commentary.
It's one thing to badly adapt a book into a movie. That happens all the time. It's another to actually have a well-received script adaptation and then scrap it to make something terrible.
It's what happens when the people running the movie studios don't know anything about the product they put out. It's the same problem going on in the video game industry. They are trying to turn a creative endeavor into a BUSINESS, which is why the products are crap.I just don't understand. They HAD a really great script by J. Michael Straczynski, which was getting some great buzz, including possible Best Picture possibilities. It was stylistically compared with Children of Men, which is pretty appropriate for the book. Now it just looks like a crap boom fest, instead of engaging character profiles and political commentary.
It's one thing to badly adapt a book into a movie. That happens all the time. It's another to actually have a well-received script adaptation and then scrap it to make something terrible.
That has nothing to do with what happened. This was a calculated move on their part. They believe a dumb action flick will earn them more money than a moving drama. It's not that they don't know anything about the product, but rather they know the movie audience so well that they know people will buy tickets to a PG-13 action flick more than an R rated drama with action elements.It's what happens when the people running the movie studios don't know anything about the product they put out.
Well, they're also in charge of Star Trek Into Darkness. So They'll probably be alright.Considering the shitstorm going on behind the scenes with the finances, I'm not sure how Paramount will be doing afterward if this movie tanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children_of_MenI just don't understand. They HAD a really great script by J. Michael Straczynski, which was getting some great buzz, including possible Best Picture possibilities. It was stylistically compared with Children of Men, which is pretty appropriate for the book.
Children of Men was a good story and was nominated for tons of awards. It made crap at the box office. Most film-making studios are in the business of making money, not art.Despite a limited release and low earnings at the box office compared to its budget,
Nope. I disagree. I believe limited release has nothing to do with it (or is at least influenced by what I'm about to say). The general public is genuinely stupid, and corporate popcorn flicks sell more than art films ergo most "good" films are often limited release.The limited release likely didn't help it, I imagine. Plus, World War Z is much more well known to the general public as a book first. But yeah, I know. Doesn't mean I have to like it.
Currently at a "69% Fresh" rating.It's uneven -- and fans of the book may be annoyed by how thoroughly it diverges from the source material -- but World War Z still brings smart, fast-moving thrills and a solid performance from Brad Pitt to the zombie genre.