I can't complain about any of the changes, because they did such a brilliant job in "rebooting" the series. When it comes to the sequel there are a few complaining about the re-using of certain classic characters. Honestly I think the series wouldn't be as brilliant if every movie didn't bring back at least one "rebooted" version of a classic character. Doesn't always have to be the main villain (such as the 1st film shows), but where would a reboot series be if it didn't build on it's predecessor? JJ's Star Trek's timeline alteration gives us a range of new possibilities. With the destruction of Vulcan JJ made it very clear that this world would have some major changes that would keep it new and alive, regardless of the few familiar faces who may show up.Star Trek (2009)
This movie is awesome. And I say this as a moderate fan of Trek. This way any departures from canon (such as Uhura + Spock) don't bother me, while I can still have fun spotting the references to the old TV series and movies. ("Dammit, I'm a doctor not a physicist!")
Wish they'd spent more time developing Nero though. He could've been a deep and sympathetic character, and Eric Bana definitely has the acting chops to pull it off. Instead he's a typical scenery-chewing Romulan big bad.
Also, lightning storm in space causing problems for the Kelvin? Are you kidding me? It's captained by FREAKING THOR!!
I'll have to check this out, it looked pretty good and I enjoyed his other serious role, Dan in Real LifeSeeking a Friend for the End of the World
I'm wondering why this one had only a 56% at Rotten Tomatoes. I think honestly it's because critics didn't want to see Steve Carell in a serious role. They also seemed to dislike that the movie wavered between dark and serious and humorous. A couple said that the leads had no chemistry. I have to disagree with all of these. I really enjoyed this movie, and I recommend it. It's not an oscar winning epic, but it is an interesting take on an old story. The humor played against the dark is precisely what makes it a good watch.
Yeah, I don't get it. All crime is legal and people's are just murdering each other? White collar crime for me please.
Of course, I haven't seen the movie so if they touch on that, I apologize.
From what I'm told, they take the premise and then just do murdering and a house invasion movie with it. There are some rules--the president is exempt, and you can't use certain kinds of weapons.Yeah, I don't get it. All crime is legal and people's are just murdering each other? White collar crime for me please.
Of course, I haven't seen the movie so if they touch on that, I apologize.
Got to the theater late last night and missed the last showing of This is the End so I ended up seeing The Purge.
The only thing purged was my asshole and what was purged was less shitty than the 85 minutes I spent watching that sack of trash.
I felt this way about Your Highness and The Sitter.21 Jump Street was surprisingly more entertaining than I ever would have imagined.
Sally Fields was the worst at this in the movie. She was trying SO HARD for an Oscar.Lincoln
For the most part I like this, but I've discovered that I have an issue with so-called realistic movies: I enjoy the story and get into it, and then as soon as I see an Oscar clip - that scene that is clearly added to invoke a sense of drama or meaning but does not really reflect how people act in real life - the entire affair feels trite. I don't get this from "popcorn" movies because I don't intend to take them seriously, but when something is realistic, but then a character pauses dramatically to watch someone walk away for example, it drives me nuts. I didn't get this at all from Argo, much to its credit.
I blame Tropic Thunder.
I didn't think we were supposed to discuss those types of movies here.Good ass movie, weird ass sex scene.
Hyphenator to the rescue!I didn't think we were supposed to discuss those types of movies here.
Sounds like my favorite kind of movie.Good ass-movie, weird ass-sex scene.