if Tupac as a Hologram is Superman's father, I will see this movie
That's interesting.http://www.youtube.com/watch?annota...ure=iv&hd=1&src_vid=cGsGQ_Cg338&v=dVVwa1N3TS4
The more I see of this movie the better it looks.
Well... they were going for a darker and grittier Superman, I guess... but yeah, that's pretty bullshit.http://thrillbent.com/blog/man-of-steel-since-you-asked/
Walking Superman encyclopedia Mark Waid saw it and wrote his thoughts. There are very heavy spoilers for it.
And...well, I was tired from work and not in a very good mood, so I said screw it and read it. Now I'm not only in a worst mood, but I feel sick to my stomach.
Here's the big spoiler. The one that, when I read it, I instantly said, "No. That's not Superman. I don't want to see this movie anymore."
The big spoiler? Seriously, don't click if you don't want to know:
Superman defeats Zod by snapping his neck, killing him.
SUPERMAN. DOES. NOT. FUCKING. KILL.
I'm really, really, really considering not bothering with this piece of shit at all.
Don't bother with it. I never understand this line of thinking. By going, knowing what you know, you're giving your dollar vote in support of this movie. I've heard enough that I will be staying far away from the movie entirely.I'm really, really, really considering not bothering with this piece of shit at all.
Superman defeats Zod by snapping his neck, killing him.
SUPERMAN. DOES. NOT. FUCKING. KILL. Most especially in not such a bullshit, cold-blooded way.
And yes, I know he killed once in the comics before. Three Kyrptonian criminals. But doing so broke him mentally. Nervous breakdown and left Earth. It killed him to do so.
Star Trek Into Darkness is not just a rehashing of Wrath of Khan. That's not to say it doesn't include references and nods, but they are two very different movies. To put it in perspective if Into Darkness is a rehash, then Superman Returns (talk about violating core character traits) was just a screening of the Donnor films.
(Bring on the disagrees)
Sorry not sorry, but I loved it. It's all fine and dandy that you guys aren't going to see it, but I'm disappointed that you can't get off your fanboy pedastal
Thank Christ everyone's agreeing with me on here. I have a friend on Facebook who constantly judges me for choosing not to see a movie because of bullshit. Like the recent Star Trek rehashing Wrath of Khan rather than trying something different (including all the bullshit surrounding that).
This is different. This violates one of Superman's core character traits.
The sad thing is, because I'm such a huge Superman fan, I feel like I need to see it so I know exactly what I'm arguing against. But honestly? That one huge character violation is enough for me. Warner Bros. has been trying to make Superman darker and grittier for a long time now. They finally got their wish.
If I edit it, will you read the rest of it? Because I think it's important. I just felt like you were insulting me because I went to, and really enjoyed 'a piece of shit' film. I thought you wouldn't be resonable, no matter what I said.
I apologize.
Well, that's okay, and I'm sorry you won't be seeing it. But I still enjoyed, and will enjoy it again.I did read it and I'm sorry, it still violates Superman's core character. Read Mark Waid's interpretation of what you described in the link I provided.
If I edit it, will you read the rest of it? Because I think it's important. I just felt like you were insulting me because I went to, and really enjoyed 'a piece of shit' film. I thought you wouldn't be resonable, no matter what I said.
I apologize.