Yeah, that's true, but that whole story line gets me though. It's so rough especially when it comes to the kids and Freddo. I think that Breaking Bad tried to capture some of this, but couldn't quite get it (though Breaking Bad is great).Seriously I wanna slap Diane Keaton here too. Not the content, the delivery. Michael's slow burn is the only good part of this junior high school drama audition.
Yeah, I hate to be that 'focus group participant', but for a movie with such passion, energy and enthusiasm, the end just flatlined.Moulin Rouge was great ... until the end. It was just so abrupt. It was like, "movie movie mov--OKAY GO HOME".
No - I don't. And, yes, it is. I can't stand the canned laugh either.[DOUBLEPOST=1408565258,1408565154][/DOUBLEPOST]You don't watch The Big Bang Theory, do you... (not that i blame you, it's such a cavalcade of stereotypes)
Oh well. It's still a great movie to me, but that's really funny to think about that.Spoilering since it is the entire movie...and will change how you see it from now on.
Everything that takes place in the movie would happen with or without Indiana Jones. You could edit him out and things would still play out largely the same as they did. The only real difference would be the time frame. Nazis still would have obtained the Ark, still would have taken it to the Island, still would have opened it and died.
The biggest problem I had with that episode is that none of the guys had known about it already. It's not a new observation by any stretch of the imagination
Well, that's why Keaton's moaning and scenery-chewing is just the worst part of an overall favorite.Yeah, that's true, but that whole story line gets me though. It's so rough especially when it comes to the kids and Freddo.
Actually, this has been discussed and debunked by fanboys & -girls long before the BBT episode. Which definitely was funny, BUT:Oh well. It's still a great movie to me, but that's really funny to think about that.
Marian didn't cause the place to burn down. She would have fought, sure, but there's no possible way she would have won against those guys without Indy. They'd have killed her and taken the medallion.What about the whole "finding the ark" bit. Marion would've still fought back, and they would've still probably used the burn to build the wrong staff.
I know! It's like he is two different actors. Godfather III is bad on so many levels, but one of the most jarring is that Pacino's change.Although I think Pacino took some tips from her for his future shouty-screamy performances in the '80s-'90s and beyond.
Probably should be a separate thread, but speaking of Spider-Man I think the Sandman's creation scene in Raimi's third is one of the most beautiful sequences I've ever seen.How about the best part of terrible movies?
That is honestly my second biggest problem with III. (The first is Coppola actually bragging that they designed the movie beat for beat from the story structure of the first one. As if shamelessly ripping yourself off were a virtue.) What I love about Michael in I and II is that he's so quiet, when he does actually yell it's frightening and makes an impact, like at Kay at the very end of I. In III he screams so much there's zero impact no matter what he says. I completely agree it's two different Pacinos and two different Michaels. I really don't think the elder Michael would behave at all the way he was written and/or how Pacino played him in III.I know! It's like he is two different actors. Godfather III is bad on so many levels, but one of the most jarring is that Pacino's change.
I felt the same way about The Believers. Way to flush all the setup down the toilet, Mark Frost.Moulin Rouge was great ... until the end. It was just so abrupt. It was like, "movie movie mov--OKAY GO HOME".
Both movies have a ridiculous segment that remove me from the movie.The "Thunder Battle" in The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. A completely unnecessary sequence that dragged, added nothing to the story, and actually crossed some lines as far as the world of Middle-Earth was concerned. It was just... "What the fuck?" It honestly made me enjoy the entire movie less.
Yes.Margo Kiddo's wierd internal monologue while Superman's taking her flying. Just... what...
YES.The musical scenes at the end of most Dreamworks movies. So...so awkward.
But at least that's in the goddamn books! The execution may be ridiculous, but at least there's a basis for it in the story. Chunks of the mountain coming to life as psychopathic stone giants killing each other? WTF?!Both movies have a ridiculous segment that remove me from the movie.
1. What you wrote.
2. Next movie? The barrels in the river. I looked over to my bud and he was like, shrug.
You can actually say that for almost every Peter Jackson movie.The "Thunder Battle" in The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. A completely unnecessary sequence that dragged, added nothing to the story, and actually crossed some lines as far as the world of Middle-Earth was concerned. It was just... "What the fuck?" It honestly made me enjoy the entire movie less.
The giants did battle during a thunderstorm in the book. They were just not right there, causing immediate danger to the party, but they did seek cover from them. Jackson just interpreted this as them being parts of the mountain, but they were tossing boulders at each other.But at least that's in the goddamn books! The execution may be ridiculous, but at least there's a basis for it in the story. Chunks of the mountain coming to life as psychopathic stone giants killing each other? WTF?!
Making them part of the mountain isn't that big a stretch from stone giants."When he peeped out in the lightning-flashes, he saw that across the valley the stone-giants were out and were hurling rocks at one another for a game, and catching them, and tossing them down into the darkness where they smashed among the trees far below, or splintered into little bits with a bang."
I think there's a bit of over-interpreting making that into mountains coming alive and smashing into each other.
Pretty much the biggest part of the first Hobbit film I really disliked.
Well, how do you know what stone giant games look like? They could have been playing.Making them part of the mountain isn't that big a stretch from stone giants.
Going from "playing a game" to "killing each other" is, though.
Agreed, although I can understand someone saying that it padded out the movie and added nothing to the story. Of course, that was a lot of The Hobbit.Well, how do you know what stone giant games look like? They could have been playing.
None of these changes bother me in the least, because they're portrayed as what Bilbo wrote in his story for Frodo. So changes like that just seem like Bilbo being a good storyteller and adding in embellishments.
To be fair, Dare to Be Stupid was playing. Being sentient beings with a soul, they had no choice but to dance.Okay, I'm an old school, Gen 1 Transformers junkie, and I love the 80's movie. It opens with a tremendous battle that wipes out a ton of major Autobot and Decepticons characters, contains the childhood-shattering death of Optimus Prime, and features a villain who freaking eats entire planets. We even see Unicron melting down survivors of his attacks in his innards. This movie was dark.
And then come the Junkions, complete with a dance sequence. Eric Idle doing television-esque quotes to cobble some English together? That's fine. Another instance of that ridiculous universal greeting? I can live with that. But after the Autobots suffer tremendous casualties, barely survive another encounter with Galvatron, and lose both of Cybertron's moons to Unicron, they dance. Ugh...
Looks nobody's arguing that. Weird Al's music is basically mandatory fun, but it just felt so out of place.To be fair, Dare to Be Stupid was playing. Being sentient beings with a soul, they had no choice but to dance.
I always assumed it was in the same vein as the Universal Greeting. The party was used as another way to endear themselves to the Junkions, mainly because they all needed the repairs and ships to face Unicron for the finale. Sure, it's a bit out of place, but then so is Wheelie, a rhyming, childlike Autobot with a space-slingshot.Okay, I'm an old school, Gen 1 Transformers junkie, and I love the 80's movie. It opens with a tremendous battle that wipes out a ton of major Autobot and Decepticons characters, contains the childhood-shattering death of Optimus Prime, and features a villain who freaking eats entire planets. We even see Unicron melting down survivors of his attacks in his innards. This movie was dark.
And then come the Junkions, complete with a dance sequence. Eric Idle doing television-esque quotes to cobble some English together? That's fine. Another instance of that ridiculous universal greeting? I can live with that. But after the Autobots suffer tremendous casualties, barely survive another encounter with Galvatron, and lose both of Cybertron's moons to Unicron, they dance. Ugh...
Whoa, that picture just brought back a nostalgia hit like you wouldn't believe. I think I had that book when I was a kid. What's it called?I always assumed it was in the same vein as the Universal Greeting. The party was used as another way to endear themselves to the Junkions, mainly because they all needed the repairs and ships to face Unicron for the finale. Sure, it's a bit out of place, but then so is Wheelie, a rhyming, childlike Autobot with a space-slingshot.
Although in the UK comic continuity, he's a super-survivalist that helps Wreckgar get off the Quintesson's planet and slaughters Sharkticons like they're nothing.
Think I found it. It's from a book called The Story of Wheelie, the Wild Boy of Quintesson.The only name I can find is The Lost Treasure of Cybertron, from '86. Story/coloring book.
You shut your heathen mouth. The Rod is God.All Chris Tucker scenes in The Fifth Element (Ruby Rhod = Jar Jar Binks).
Now THAT sounds like my prom night!You shut your heathen mouth. The Rod is God.