Its a shame we were low on eggs, that movie gives you a hankering for them.
So you can be Jesus?Its a shame we were low on eggs, that movie gives you a hankering for them.
So you can be Jesus?
Imagery!
Just watch Wrath of Khan. It's pretty much the same movie.Star Trek Into Darkness
Well half of it, anyway. This movie was pretty bad. The first Abrams movie was silly but fun. This one is all over the place. Nothing Kirk does makes any sense. Ship and vehicle hardiness is relative to the plot. The plot is frankly a mess, and the characters are all needlessly plot-dumb. I gave up and turned it off halfway. I'll try to make it through the rest later.
HERETIC!HCGLNS said:Watched Pacific Rim last night. Horrible and terribly stupid. Couldn't get past the ridiculous premise to enjoy the very dark special effects.
You've played D&D, a game where every aspect of it is pretending you're a character in a magical world, where there's barely visual representation to what you're doing so that it relies entirely on your imagination to fulfill its non-existent structure, but robots that fight monsters is beyond your suspension of disbelief?Watched Pacific Rim last night. Horrible and terribly stupid. Couldn't get past the ridiculous premise to enjoy the very dark special effects.
I decided to watch this again based partially on this comment. I'm just past the halfway point right now. Kirk is clearly emotional, the ship is hardly featured in the first half at all (and just as clearly sabotaged, not just broken), and the characters appear to be cautious, not plot-dumb. Kirk definitely has suspicions about what is going on. Either you made it further than you indicated and something specific ticked you off or you aren't giving it a fair shake.Star Trek Into Darkness
Well half of it, anyway. This movie was pretty bad. The first Abrams movie was silly but fun. This one is all over the place. Nothing Kirk does makes any sense. Ship and vehicle hardiness is relative to the plot. The plot is frankly a mess, and the characters are all needlessly plot-dumb. I gave up and turned it off halfway. I'll try to make it through the rest later.
I see the blundering differently, I think. Kirk is emotionally unhinged and acting without much foresight. This is actually addressed (not too long after you stopped, I'd wager).It could be. Then again, they seemed pretty plot-dumb in the self-contained scenes. I see the cautiousness, yet they seem to blunder on ahead despite the cautiousness. I turned it off when Kirk put Khan into cuffs. I mean, he just took on a battalion of the toughest warriors humans know of and didn't even bat an eyelash, then surrenders right after asking about the torpedoes? Clearly he wants on your ship. I've read no spoilers, but I'm going to guess the torpedoes.aren't explosive at all, and given his question about numbers, they contain people he cares about rather than warheads
I see the blundering differently, I think. Kirk is emotionally unhinged and acting without much foresight. This is actually addressed (not too long after you stopped, I'd wager).
There are definitely some problems in Abrams' Star Trek...And then death is cured, and the need for spaceships is made obsolete now that they have transporters that can send you apparently anywhere in the universe.
And then death is cured, and the need for spaceships is made obsolete now that they have transporters that can send you apparently anywhere in the universe.
Who's "he"? This is the first movie Jason Mewes produced, and the first movie Steve Stark directed.[DOUBLEPOST=1410922232,1410921948][/DOUBLEPOST]X-Men: Days of Future PastJay and Silent Bob's Groovy Cartoon Movie: Not the best movie he's made, but still a fun ride. I also like how they straight up acknowledged how they couldn't get Mark Hamill, and just went with the complete opposite voice with Tara Strong. Freakin' funny.
I don't understand. What's wrong with the ending?X-Men: Days of Future Past
It was way better than I expected. And then then ending happened.
Kevin Smith co-wrote it with Steve Stark, as well as writing the comic which it was based on which I need to buy now.Who's "he"? This is the first movie Jason Mewes produced, and the first movie Steve Stark directed.[DOUBLEPOST=1410922232,1410921948][/DOUBLEPOST]
After establishing twice already that Logan ' s mind is only in the past while Kitty is there to maintain the link, and that if the link is severed his mind returns to the present, Logan wakes up in present day ( just a random, nothing special ordinary day, mind you. So he's been living out his life from 1973-2014, presumably just fine) suddenly remembering the future and unsure of what happened in the interim. They ignored their own bs time travel rules for the sake of a cheesy feel good ending.I don't understand. What's wrong with the ending?
But his 2014 consciousness was separate from his body due to Kitty's intervention. It was free floating and returned to 2014. It just returned to the 2014 new timeline.
Everything I've heard about this is people saying that it was trying to be a completely stupid but charming horror movie (like Birdemic or Sharknado), but it fails because it's so obviously forced. Like it was TRYING to be bad instead of trying to be charming.Tusk
This is a mixed bag, but my god is this a fascinating film. The comedic portions of the film, particularly the stuff that concerns Quebec detective Guy Lapointe, are weak and falter, but the horror elements work and show some some good development for Kevin Smith. He does a nice job with building the tension as the main villain's insanity becomes further revealed and he certainly captures the grotesque nature of a man turned into a walrus. It's been a long time since a film made me audibly say, "What the fuck?" in the theater.
Should you see it? Maybe. It is a mixed bag, with strong parts that get hampered by coexisting along the comedic portions, but at the very least, this is a very different film than most out there.
I don't feel like it was trying to copy something like Birdemic or Sharknado, simply that Kevin Smith had this crazy idea for a film that he talked about on his podcast, reached out to his fans to see if anyone would want to see him make it, then made it after they responded. As I said, the bad parts are the comedic stuff that comes into play with stuff like that character Guy Lapointe. When it's just allowing itself to do the horror and grotesque nature of a story concerning a man turned into the walrus, it's good.Everything I've heard about this is people saying that it was trying to be a completely stupid but charming horror movie (like Birdemic or Sharknado), but it fails because it's so obviously forced. Like it was TRYING to be bad instead of trying to be charming.