Zappit
Staff member
Never seem the 80s Transformers animated movie, huh?It transforms into a planet. That sounds boring.
Oh God it's $600. That's too damn much for me to justify.
I need to keep telling myself that, over and over.
Anyone want to go in splitsies and have a timeshare joint ownership?
Holy I owned that book.
I probably have it, too...somewhere.Holy I owned that book.
Is it OK if it just sounds like Maurice LaMarche?Now, if it also SOUNDS like Orson Wells, then...
Yeah, for a toy that price is ridiculous. For a high-end piece marketed at adult collectors with plenty of disposable income? Not so much.Personally not that interested, but I don't think the price tag is that ridiculous. Some of the Lego star wars items are more expensive.
Or you can stack up a bunch of regular mattresses.I could buy 4!
FWIW, I think you've got the better haul.For that money, I could buy the LEGO Saturn V Rocket, the LEGO Apollo Lunar Lander (LEM), The LEGO Shuttle Transporter, and still have enough money left over for groceries.
Are they just the Rainmakers but in Earth-Seeker form, or Rainmakers in Cybertronian form? Because an obscure toy company called "Impossible Toys" did that and I'd like another chance to get a bad ass proto-former Cybertronian jet...let it...slip by me once before...many stellarcycles ago.Update on the design presented at SDCC.
They’ve also revealed a TON of new figures, too, and this pretty much sealed it for me. I’d rather get those smaller figures than this big one. Apparently, they also revealed that Unicron will be available in Japan as a TakaraTomy Mall exclusive. It...might be more readily available than previously expected.
So that $600 is safe, though part of it is going to purchase A LOT of other figures. Seriously, they’re actually doing the Rainmakers! I’ve wanted that since I was six!
But if they made a non-transforming model, you know you'd be saying to yourself "Man, I know it would be impractical, but wouldn't it be cool if it could transform?"I saw a video of someone demonstrating how it transforms. Cool as it is conceptually, it didn't look like fun at all. A non-transforming model would probably look better and be more fun to pose.