http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090903/us_nm/us_bank_thumbprint
No thumbprint, no withdrawal, even if you have no arms.
No thumbprint, no withdrawal, even if you have no arms.
This is a good option. But seriously? Can you blame the teller for not thinking of that? When was the last time you had to ID a guy with no arms?They should at least take the serial number off his friggen prosthetic arms.
It sounds like they tried. Except the man was unwilling to open up an account or bring in his wife to confirm relationship. He may have even been unwilling to let the Teller check the Serial number on the appendages for all we know. What's the next option? Ask the man to "swear on his mommy's grave that he's telling the truth?".Again, I repeat, it's standard practice, that in that rare kind of situation, you simply do a more indepth ID check.
I kind of think they were just berating him and of course he wouldn't want to be compliant at that point."They looked at my prosthetic hands and the teller said, 'Well, obviously you can't give us a thumbprint'," Steve Valdez told CNN on Wednesday.
Not going to say that the Teller wasn't giving bad customer service. But considering that he can get fired for not following proper procedure I don't blame him for not allowing the man to cash the check. I doubt this kind of situation was covered in his training. So without a manager on duty to approve it, I would politely ask him to come back later if he was unwilling to go through the other options.I kind of think they were just berating him and of course he wouldn't want to be compliant at that point."They looked at my prosthetic hands and the teller said, 'Well, obviously you can't give us a thumbprint'," Steve Valdez told CNN on Wednesday.
No indeed but was there any loss to the company from the action.A clerk was fired for giving a free room to a desperate woman in need of help on Christmas eve. You can imagine how much a big deal that was to the media just cause it's so heart wrenching. But the clerk did go against policy and she was fired. I sympathize for her, but it's a constant reminder that companies are not charities
Even for management who could have asked the employee to clean the room in their own time as a fitting punishment.and "thinking outside the box" is simply not encouraged.