How much porn is on your hard drive?
- Thread starter Ross
- Start date
- Status
^
Pretty much. With the exception of a couple favorites in HD.
Ross
Staff member
Ross
Staff member
You'd be surprised... I've seen it with my own eyes once.
...once.[/quote]
Mav?[/QUOTE]
Haven't seen his...
It was a user on DC++ a few years back... I miss college P2P
Define "porn."
I have some pictures of extremely pretty naked women on my computer that I do not at all classify as porn. I also have many other curious images/movies (specific examples of eyebrow-raising "No way do people go for that!") that I'm positive were created with full intent of being porn, but which I have collected more for amusement, shock value or just plain incredulity, since they don't 'do it' for me.
--Patrick
I have some pictures of extremely pretty naked women on my computer that I do not at all classify as porn. I also have many other curious images/movies (specific examples of eyebrow-raising "No way do people go for that!") that I'm positive were created with full intent of being porn, but which I have collected more for amusement, shock value or just plain incredulity, since they don't 'do it' for me.
--Patrick
Ross
Staff member
Oh I highly disagree![/quote]
Oh my God, do you people really need a definition for this poll?
Fine. Whatever.
PORN: People showing private parts for the purpose of showing their private parts.
That's what we'll use for this poll.
Oh I highly disagree![/quote]
Oh my God, do you people really need a definition for this poll?
Fine. Whatever.
PORN: People showing private parts for the purpose of showing their private parts.
That's what we'll use for this poll.[/QUOTE]
Hmmm... what about...
Unfortunately, I didn't know Michelangelo personally, but I would guess, If he didn't want to show Davids private parts... He would have covered it with a fig-leaf or something else.
Sooooo... the question now is: Was Michelangelo some kind of early Pornograph?
And what about so many old and long decayed artists: Was their art some kind of early pornography in disguise?
(On a serious note, I don't think that michelangelo didn't solely intent to show Davids private parts... But they became certainly a prominent part of David for the world to see... I'd even dare say, Davids private parts are the most famues p. parts in the world. After mine, that is...)
Sooooo... the question now is: Was Michelangelo some kind of early Pornograph?
And what about so many old and long decayed artists: Was their art some kind of early pornography in disguise?
(On a serious note, I don't think that michelangelo didn't solely intent to show Davids private parts... But they became certainly a prominent part of David for the world to see... I'd even dare say, Davids private parts are the most famues p. parts in the world. After mine, that is...)
Ross
Staff member
Michelangelo's David was not made for the purpose of showing his private parts... it's because it shows human anatomy, like the rest of the statue does. Therefore, it is not porn.
Also, it's a fucking statue.
Any more stupid questions? Because I'm not answering them anymore. They'll just get deleted instead.
Also, it's a fucking statue.
Any more stupid questions? Because I'm not answering them anymore. They'll just get deleted instead.
Ross
Staff member
Why is this even being discussed? All I asked was "how much porn do you have on your hard drive?" ... not "what is your opinion of what porn is" or "let's have a debate that will have no real conclusion, as everyone's view as to what porn is is different". Just answer the damn poll!
- Status