Please expand on this.[/QUOTE]The pacing is generally terrible in older movies--even the good ones.
Lawrence of Arabia is an example of a great film with the slow pacing. It is still one of my favorites, but a lot of the people that I've shown it to were bored to tears during the marches across the sea into which no oar is dipped. The imagery was great, but people brought up on modern popcorn movies can not handle the subtle moments.Do you have any specific examples from good or great movies? Because I can't think of any specifically that would match that description. I get the idea you're talking about, though, and it's something that still happens in many, many movies today.
Hellfire scores points for having a bitching bilingual bonus, though. That chanting in the background? It's an actual prayer in Latin that provides a nice bit of ironic commentary throughout the song. Observe:Hellfire is a really close #2 imo, but it has 100% less nazi imagery in a children's movie, so it loses.
"Old movies" is not a genre reallyAlso, let me reiterate that I'm a big fan of these movies. I'm just pointing out one of the genre's flaws.
Oh, okay. Yeah, it's a different style of filmmaking, just like most actors then used a different style of acting than what is dominant today. It's still a very effective style of filmmaking when used correctly, so I don't think it's accurate to call it a "flaw." But I get where you're coming from now.Not entirely, I'm talking mostly about pure non-essential moments. I'll have to find some specific examples, but know that I'm far from alone in pointing this out as a major trend change from older to newer movies--it's a fairly common point. Cowboys riding horses across the desert, for example...great for setting tone--the first one or two times. People sitting on a shaking train car set reading newspapers. Sure, they're all technically serving a purpose of setting or what have you. Everything in a film can be deconstructed to mean something. And sure, there are modern movies guilty of the same, but it's far less common.
Also, let me reiterate that I'm a big fan of these movies. I'm just pointing out one of the genre's flaws.
You can get a little bit of a feeling for if a movie is something you'd like from the general buzz, people involved in making it, plot, etc.To the OP: I do not know. As that I have not seen it yet, I cannot know which would be the best.
I didn't say these are the best movies you "should watch", just the best movie that you think you'd like, that has just slipped through the cracks.Honestly? I can't think of anything "great" that I "should watch" that I haven't....
Hm. Ok.I didn't say these are the best movies you "should watch", just the best movie that you think you'd like, that has just slipped through the cracks.
arguably?[/QUOTE]It also has arguably the best \"villain\" song Disney has ever done.
I took this great class in film noir. I was watching something old (Maltese Falcon maybe), and they have Bogart and some girl talking, and then this really slow pan away to a window outside. The teacher stops the movie, says, "They're doing it now. You don't know this because you're not used to it, but when the movie came out everyone knew that the slow pan away meant they were doing it now", and then she started it up again. I was stunned, and watching some of those older movies changed considerably that day.Not entirely, I'm talking mostly about pure non-essential moments. I'll have to find some specific examples, but know that I'm far from alone in pointing this out as a major trend change from older to newer movies--it's a fairly common point. Cowboys riding horses across the desert, for example...great for setting tone--the first one or two times. People sitting on a shaking train car set reading newspapers. Sure, they're all technically serving a purpose of setting or what have you. Everything in a film can be deconstructed to mean something. And sure, there are modern movies guilty of the same, but it's far less common.
Also, let me reiterate that I'm a big fan of these movies. I'm just pointing out one of the genre's flaws.
arguably?[/QUOTE]It also has arguably the best \"villain\" song Disney has ever done.
I took this great class in film noir. I was watching something old (Maltese Falcon maybe), and they have Bogart and some girl talking, and then this really slow pan away to a window outside. The teacher stops the movie, says, "They're doing it now. You don't know this because you're not used to it, but when the movie came out everyone knew that the slow pan away meant they were doing it now", and then she started it up again. I was stunned, and watching some of those older movies changed considerably that day.[/QUOTE]Not entirely, I'm talking mostly about pure non-essential moments. I'll have to find some specific examples, but know that I'm far from alone in pointing this out as a major trend change from older to newer movies--it's a fairly common point. Cowboys riding horses across the desert, for example...great for setting tone--the first one or two times. People sitting on a shaking train car set reading newspapers. Sure, they're all technically serving a purpose of setting or what have you. Everything in a film can be deconstructed to mean something. And sure, there are modern movies guilty of the same, but it's far less common.
Also, let me reiterate that I'm a big fan of these movies. I'm just pointing out one of the genre's flaws.
I disagree. It's an absolutely masterpiece. However, that is only one of the reasons it's consistently placed at the top of "Best Movies Ever Made" lists.[/QUOTE]That's to say: I don't recommend it unless you want to watch it so you can say you watched it.
So if you don't like it you are not a person?I have, multiple times. Each time was more compelling and rewarding than the last. I think it's worth watching if you are a person.
American history X?For the record, I considered Citizen Kane and Raging Bull really terrible movies. They might have been revolutionary and amazing for their time, but to me, they're just utter crap.
As far as good movie that I've missed out on, I'll have to get back to you guys on that. My movie buff friend keeps track of that sort of things and always properly insults me when I haven't seen a good movie.
Oh! I know American X is on that list!
You'll never look at the word curb-stomping the same way again...American history X?
I would highly recommend seeing Schindler's List if you like dramas at all. Though it's set in WWII, it's not a combat flick.Schindler's List, I guess.
I don't take a particular interest in movies set during WWII, though, so I'll probably never watch it unless someone makes me. So I suppose that'll make it the best movie I'll never see.
Seconding the Godfather (II and III, though, have already seen I).
I would highly recommend seeing Schindler's List if you like dramas at all. Though it's set in WWII, it's not a combat flick.[/QUOTE]Schindler's List, I guess.
I don't take a particular interest in movies set during WWII, though, so I'll probably never watch it unless someone makes me. So I suppose that'll make it the best movie I'll never see.
Seconding the Godfather (II and III, though, have already seen I).