Soliders in Iraq Are Ordered To Indiscriminately Kill Civilians

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Chibibar

Past discussions about police with you mostly. You seem like a person who values government types over the lives of American civilians.
Hmm. I do support the government to an extent. AZ law for example, I don't support. I think it is a bad idea (see that thread if that is still around) Generally I have no problem with police and the rules they operate within in. I am more about the establish lawful rules and following them. I don't agree with the unjust laws (like AZ laws) or laws that suppress human rights (like the lack of same sex marriage and such)


Honestly I've always thought the only way to defeat the insurgency was to get Iraq's economy buzzing along like a busy little beehive. Reduced unemployment leads too fewer mercenaries joining the insurgents ranks and robs them of some of their brightest soldiers. After that would be shutting down the flow of military grade explosives to the insurgents and going after their financing.

Once those things happen there will be a few holdouts who will try to continue the fight but without the fear of those around them it'll be easier to hunt them down and drag them in front of court where they can be tried and executed.

Actually planning on fighting the ground troops and grunts of the insurgency should be a measure of last resort because winning a war through killing of the enemies troops is a really stupid way to win.
Sounds interesting, but alas, these people do not follow normal rules. I mean they are recruiting people who are financially stable and do crazy things. I mean we have read articles that people around the world are following their dogma (faith, whatever you call it, I can't think of the right words) people abandoning all their worldly goods and join them ready to cause terror.

This police action/war (whatever you want to call it) is not like any other type of fight the world has to fight against. It is not a typical one where you can defeat/negotiate with the leaders and they will just drop their arms and have peace. I am sure if the economy is stronger, then they will have more money to access better weapons and bombs.

of course it doesn't help that there are two to three factions that has been at each other's throat for over 2000 years.
 
Hmm. I do support the government to an extent. AZ law for example, I don't support. I think it is a bad idea (see that thread if that is still around) Generally I have no problem with police and the rules they operate within in. I am more about the establish lawful rules and following them. I don't agree with the unjust laws (like AZ laws) or laws that suppress human rights (like the lack of same sex marriage and such)
Not even remotely what I'm talking about. But going further would just be rehashing a debate we both agreed to put aside because we couldn't agree on even the most basic things.

Sounds interesting, but alas, these people do not follow normal rules. I mean they are recruiting people who are financially stable and do crazy things. I mean we have read articles that people around the world are following their dogma (faith, whatever you call it, I can't think of the right words) people abandoning all their worldly goods and join them ready to cause terror.
Don't think that the people they recruit are the same in Iraq and America.

In America the people they recruit are the financially stable people. In Iraq the people they recruit are Mercenaries who sign up for the paycheck because that is literally the only job they can find in Iraq and young men who don't see any future in trying to secure a real job.

They don't sign up for the adventure or the glory, fuck they don't even sign up the glory of Allah. They sign up because a life in the insurgency means money and protection for them and their family.

This police action/war (whatever you want to call it) is not like any other type of fight the world has to fight against. It is not a typical one where you can defeat/negotiate with the leaders and they will just drop their arms and have peace.
Are you kidding? Cause you're certainly talking out of your ass. Iraq is a bog standard Insurgency no different than the fight in Colombia or the fight with the Tamal Tigers in Africa. Insurgencies never end when you focus on killing the leaders they only end when people can drop their arms and go earn a living.

I am sure if the economy is stronger, then they will have more money to access better weapons and bombs.
Muslims aren't subhuman monsters who fight for the shits and giggles. They're people who want nothing more than to make money, find a companion and raise a family and they fight because they think those are in danger from outside forces.

You give them money and those who are already rich will spend that money on making more money while those who didn't have any before will spend it on things they need or things they like.

They aren't going to hand over half of their wages so that their country can be turned back into a warzone.

of course it doesn't help that there are two to three factions that has been at each other's throat for over 2000 years.
Actually during times of prosperity and plenty Shites and Sunnis get along pretty well. It's only during times of crazy leaders and chaos that the groups started tearing at each other. Settle things down and you'll have people mixing the neighborhoods again like they did in pre war Iraq.
 
of course it doesn't help that there are two to three factions that has been at each other's throat for over 2000 years.
Actually during times of prosperity and plenty Shites and Sunnis get along pretty well. It's only during times of crazy leaders and chaos that the groups started tearing at each other. Settle things down and you'll have people mixing the neighborhoods again like they did in pre war Iraq.
It's really only been this bad since after World War 2. Many of the older people in the Middle East can remember being able to go to college and study, without people trying to murder them for different faiths. It's only recently it's become this bad, mainly because they were afraid of losing their identity to the West.
 
War is evil.
Thats a huge generalization that seems to live in an interesting little black and white world.[/QUOTE]

Wars DO tend to be evil in some sense. They are rarely, if ever, started for the right reasons.[/QUOTE]

Citation? I've never actually studied how many wars were started for the "right" reasons. And how are we defining "right"? Also, who said it has to be about who "started" the war? Was the US entering WW2 evil because the war was started for the "wrong" reasons by Hitler, etc?

My point of course, is that, of COURSE war can be an evil thing, it can be a horrific and terrible, vile, thing, but that doesn't mean all war is evil and entered into for the "wrong" reasons. Life just isn't that simple.[/QUOTE]

Fair enough, I used too strong/general terms. I still think that no war is started (started, not joined!) selflessly (I mean, for the good of others)... And, well, I have no citation but show me a single war that was started for the 'right reasons'... Which would be helping people. Or something. Whatever you want it to be.
What's more, I'd even say that no country will participate in a war if it's not for: 1-self protection (ok, 'right' reason) 2-they have something to gain.

Bleh. Forget about this if you want. I endorse Den's posts, I think he expressed something very similar to what I think.
 
It's all good man, I don't really think we are that far off, just like I said about Den. I think we all agree on the important points.

AGREEMENT DANCE! :moon:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top