And in twisted local news...

[bigcountry23]

A Salt Lake City mother was arrested for shopping the face of one of her daughters classmates onto a picture of a woman "engaged" with a dog and then putting the pictures around the school.

Danette Stark, Mother, Creates Obscene Image of 13-Year-Old as Retaliation, Say Cops - Crimesider - CBS News

She has been charged with 18 counts of "sexual exploitation of a minor" however there is already talk in the local media that that will not stick, citing a New Hampshire Supreme Court ruling which overturned a conviction of a camp counselor who morphed the heads of his campers onto "adult models", because the pictures did not depict the parts of the minors.

Woman

Stark indicates she created the fliers for "perceived wrongs".

Of the 30 that were posted, 12 fliers are still unaccounted for.

 

[Officer_Charon]

Even if the criminal charges do not stick, she could still face a civil suit for libel and defamation of character...

To say nothing of any possible retaliation from the community itself. Some people...

 

[David]

She posted the images in the school? Can't she still face charges for exposing minors to pornography?

 

[Officer_Charon]

Ah! Missed that part. In GA it would stick... don't know about Utah.

O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103 (2009)
§ 16-12-103. Selling, loaning, distributing, or exhibiting; duties of video game retailers

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or loan for monetary consideration or otherwise furnish or disseminate to a minor:

(1) Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, or similar visual representation or image of a person or portion of the human body which depicts sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors; or

(2) Any book, pamphlet, magazine, printed matter however reproduced, or sound recording which contains any matter enumerated in paragraph (1) of this subsection, or explicit and detailed verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which, taken as a whole, is harmful to minors.

 

[bigcountry23]

I figure they at least have her for possession and distribution of bestiality and exposing minors to pornography.

 

[Officer_Charon]

Possessing beastiality isn't a crime, in and of itself. Actually PERFORMING the act, however, is.

Lemme see what Utah law says... Nice! They've got something similar...

76-10-1204. Distributing pornographic material.
(1) A person is guilty of distributing pornographic material when he knowingly:
(a) sends or brings any pornographic material into the state with intent to distribute or exhibit it to others;
(b) prepares, publishes, prints, or possesses any pornographic material with intent to distribute or exhibit it to others;
(c) distributes or offers to distribute, exhibits or offers to exhibit any pornographic material to others;
(d) writes, creates, or solicits the publication or advertising of pornographic material;
(e) promotes the distribution or exhibition of material he represents to be pornographic; or
(f) presents or directs a pornographic performance in any public place or any place exposed to public view or participates in that portion of the performance which makes it pornographic.

 

[Chazwozel]

Ah! Missed that part. In GA it would stick... don't know about Utah.

O.C.G.A. § 16-12-103 (2009)
§ 16-12-103. Selling, loaning, distributing, or exhibiting; duties of video game retailers

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or loan for monetary consideration or otherwise furnish or disseminate to a minor:

(1) Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, or similar visual representation or image of a person or portion of the human body which depicts sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors; or

(2) Any book, pamphlet, magazine, printed matter however reproduced, or sound recording which contains any matter enumerated in paragraph (1) of this subsection, or explicit and detailed verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which, taken as a whole, is harmful to minors.

I'm pretty sure Utah, being the puritan of all puritan states would have a law addressing it.

 

[drawn_inward]

Two wrongs don't make a right. Nice way to set an example for your kids.