Black Swan
- Thread starter Necronic
- Start date
- Status
Good to hear that you enjoyed it. I'll likely have to wait until it is on cable though.
Well goddammit, I was waiting for it to go on DVD.
Though the last time I did that with an Aronofsky film was The Fountain and I sorely regretted it.
Damn it, Necronic.
Though the last time I did that with an Aronofsky film was The Fountain and I sorely regretted it.
Damn it, Necronic.
I'm super excited for this movie, and I'm hoping to catch it next week after work some night.
This was the creepiest freaking movie I've ever seen. It was good, but holy hell.
Necronic
Staff member
My girl said it best:
"That was one of the best movies I have ever seen. But I don't want to see it in theaters again."
I'm not saying you shouldn't see it in theaters. You absolutely have to. But its so powerful that its not necessarilly something you want to experience twice.
Once was definitely enough.
It's....a ballet movie. A movie about ballerinas. Starring Queen Amidala and Meg from Family Guy. Directed by the guy who planned to make Batman a crazy homeless dude. Are we...are we talking about the same movie here? A movie about ballet starring an actress whose best known role was super wooden and another one who is a sitcom star directed by a guy who thinks Frank Miller is still a good writer. How can this be good?
Portman was wooden in Star Wars because of the director, really. She does an amazing job in Black Swan and deserves the Golden Globe nomination she received. Also, Aranofsky is a bit on the pretentious side in most of his films but he knows his stuff. He used horror direction techniques more effectively than I've seen in actual horror films.
P
Philosopher B.
Damn, yo, ol' Georgie Porgie even made Liam Neeson and Samuel I-Will-Kick-Yo-Ass Jackson boring. I've loved the Port in every other role I've seen her in. Plus she's totally hot bald, yo. I mean goddamn. Not that she's bald in this movie, I just thought I'd mention it.
- Philo-B., who would see this in theatres if he currently had the scratch
- Philo-B., who would see this in theatres if he currently had the scratch
P
Philosopher B.
Seriously, she can act, she can rock the shaved head look, and she never pays for her dry-cleaning:
I mean,
sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-it,
what's not to like?
I mean,
sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-it,
what's not to like?
Why do you think there's no way to tell a compelling story about ballet? Natalie Portman is an amazing actress. Mila Kunis was very good in Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Darren Aronofsky has never made a movie that wasn't really interesting at the very least, and the vast majority are outright great.
But nevermind, go ahead and use your narrow view of nerd shit like the awful Star Wars movies, Family Guy, and Batman movies that never even happened to talk about grown-up movies.
---------- Post added at 04:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:16 PM ----------
Also lol at Inception being the big other contender for Best Picture this year.
Yes, in an artsy way
Seeing it New Year's Eve; Dream's willing to go a second time.
Yes, with each other.
Dave
Staff member
Yes, with each other.[/QUOTE]
What, seriously? You get to see Portman and Kunis naked and in a lesbian scene? Oscar contender, baby!
I have to watch it on Haji vision damn it! I wanted to be on leave when this came out, but it just wasn't in the cards for me, I'll go buy my $2 DVD of this when they get a watchable copy 
Yes, with each other.[/QUOTE]
What, seriously? You get to see Portman and Kunis naked and in a lesbian scene? Oscar contender, baby![/QUOTE]
They do, though you don't see any naughty parts. You do see one of them get to orgasm, though.
Dave
Staff member
Yes, with each other.[/QUOTE]
What, seriously? You get to see Portman and Kunis naked and in a lesbian scene? Oscar contender, baby![/QUOTE]
They do, though you don't see any naughty parts. You do see one of them get to orgasm, though.[/QUOTE]
Aw! If I wanted to see someone fake an orgasm I'd just go home to the wife.
No naughty bits takes this back to video for me. (I'm only partially joking.)
He's going to see it in theater 
the other part is not the joke
the other part is not the joke 
This movie honestly looks dull to me... but who knows... maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised?
If so many of you are swearing that it's amazing I'll have to give it a look sometime... but not in the theatres... I'll wait for DVD.
If so many of you are swearing that it's amazing I'll have to give it a look sometime... but not in the theatres... I'll wait for DVD.
Haha, that's an awesome summary.
1) Didn't say "can't". But somehow the trials and tribulations of prima ballerinas really doesn't sound like an exciting film to me. Especially when the trailers make it look to me like it is about a rivalry between two ballerinas.
2) Three. Straight. Films. Of wooden ass acting. "Nerd shit" though it may be, it doesn't change the fact that those flicks were definitely her star making roles and poorly acted. And it is really hard for me to blame Lucas' writing or directing, seeing as the original Star Wars (more nerd shit) is on the AFI Top 100. He wrote and directed that, the dialogue is no less goofy, and yet somehow the actors pulled it off.
3) Mila Kunis was great in a romantic comedy that was very screwball and had a fair bit of raunchy humor, yes. I, however, didn't like her performance in Book of Eli. Her most well known well remains a sitcom character. She is great at humor. I've not yet seen her manage drama convincingly.
4) A Batman movie that didn't happen because it was a thunderously bad idea. Like "The Day The Clown Cried" bad. But I admit, I'm unfamiliar with most of his work.
5) Man, fuck this "nerd shit" angle of yours. Heath Ledger won an Oscar for "nerd shit". Christopher Nolan got huge Hollywood clout on "Nerd Shit". Eight movies on the AFI Top 100 are "Nerd Shit". Fuck this "nerd shit isn't good because it isn't artsy" shit.
Your movie snob reaction, rather than fucking explaining how the movie is worth seeing like I asked ("how can this be good?" is a question, you see), makes me not want to see this movie. I'll be at True Grit, thank you very much. Jeff Bridges, the Coen Brothers, can't go wrong.
P
Philosopher B.
My question is, why's the swan gotta be black?! Are they saying all black people are ... downy?!!!
Seriously, have you EVER seen a Natalie Portman movie other than Star Wars? You shouldn't need more proof than "Sam Jackson is bland" to completely discredit Lucas as a director, at least nowadays. There's a huge difference between being a young director with something to prove and lots of people to bounce ideas off of then
Go watch "V for Vendetta."
Or "The Professional" for that matter (when she was 12).
Fair enough. Though I've heard "V For Vendetta" is terrible if you enjoyed the graphic novel, so I'm not sure that would help me much.
Seriously though, can someone explain to me why this plot synopsis:
should be compelling to me? I really can't stand those movies that are about people with shitty lives being depressed for two hours (for example, "Precious" was a well made film with great acting...but I have no interest in watching it again) and I can't help but think that a film about a ballerina with an abusive stage mom at home, a sexual predator at rehearsal, and who cuts herself to deal with the pain would be just that. Sad and depressing for the sake of being sad and depressing. That is not to say that it can't be well written, well acted, well directed, that its usage of lighting and sound and color won't be masterful, that its mise en scene won't be masterfully handled. Hell, I'm sure that a movie getting this much positive buzz will have all that going for it and more. However, critics also seem to love movies about sad people being sad and making the audience sad. I think I'll stick to seeing "True Grit" instead.
It is definitely not a depressing movie. I would say a better description would be, "A perfectionist ballerina begins to psychologically unravel while trying to deal with the pressures of a conflicting lead role that demands she explore her uninhibited side."
That's not to say you will like it but it is definitely not about a girl who cuts herself.
That's not to say you will like it but it is definitely not about a girl who cuts herself.
Necronic
Staff member
@ Norris:
American Beauty, Little Children, Revolutionary Road, Shortcuts - Incredibly boring americans
A Beautiful Mind - A mathmetician
Good Will Hunting - another mathmetician. Nothing more exciting than math theorems
Dead Poets Society - Prep school morons
The Good Earth - A FARMER! WOWZA!
The Great Gatsby - Pretentious rich pricks
The Breakfast Club - Teenagers
--------------
I could keep going. Its not the superficial excitment of the characters that make a story good. Its the depth of the character and the quality of the story they exist in.
Did star wars teach you nothing?
The story itself is about ballerinas, but only in a superficial sense. Its more about how a person can be flawed in their perfection, and perfect in their flaws. Its a story told with both subtlety and force, and this is seen both in the acting as well as in the script itself. There are no characters that are entirely predictable, they all have many layers.
At the same time, the film has a level of intensity that is hard to stomach. The sights and sounds hammer down into you at a very deep level that is very hard to identify. It reminds me of Japanese Horror films in a way.
You'll notice that I'm not talking about the plot, and that's because the plot itself isn't complicated and arguably isn't that important to the quality of the film. In a way its a bit of a Taoist attempt. The story is pure in its simplicity which allows more effort to be put into the depth of the characters and the manipulation of the audience through sense.
This entire description sounds incredibly douchey. Just see the damn movie.
And that is why you fail. And also why you will love the movie. The characters are SO much more than ballerinas, yet at the same time do kind of fall into your description. The complexity of the characters is what makes it interesting (and is also what made Star wars so bad.) Lets look at some other incredibly good movies that have a similarly potentially boring set of characters:
American Beauty, Little Children, Revolutionary Road, Shortcuts - Incredibly boring americans
A Beautiful Mind - A mathmetician
Good Will Hunting - another mathmetician. Nothing more exciting than math theorems
Dead Poets Society - Prep school morons
The Good Earth - A FARMER! WOWZA!
The Great Gatsby - Pretentious rich pricks
The Breakfast Club - Teenagers
--------------
I could keep going. Its not the superficial excitment of the characters that make a story good. Its the depth of the character and the quality of the story they exist in.
Did star wars teach you nothing?
School yourself on some cinema history please. Do you know how many people kept Lucas from screwing up the first movies? Do you know how many of them were there in the second batch? The second movies were bad, not because of the acting, but because of the directing and ultimately the cowardice of the producers.
Fair enough. Her movie career is pretty young. This movie will define her career.
I don't think anyone is saying that nerd movies are inherently bad. What they are saying is that your viewpoint comes across as someone who defines film based on that genre. Calling out Natalie Portman's career and ability based on a nerd movie that was clearly a failure due to another person doesn't do you any favors and makes you look like a myopic critic with the epicurian depth of a goat.
Fair cop to a degree. The problem is that this movie is incredibly difficult to describe without ruining it. But I'll try.
The story itself is about ballerinas, but only in a superficial sense. Its more about how a person can be flawed in their perfection, and perfect in their flaws. Its a story told with both subtlety and force, and this is seen both in the acting as well as in the script itself. There are no characters that are entirely predictable, they all have many layers.
At the same time, the film has a level of intensity that is hard to stomach. The sights and sounds hammer down into you at a very deep level that is very hard to identify. It reminds me of Japanese Horror films in a way.
You'll notice that I'm not talking about the plot, and that's because the plot itself isn't complicated and arguably isn't that important to the quality of the film. In a way its a bit of a Taoist attempt. The story is pure in its simplicity which allows more effort to be put into the depth of the characters and the manipulation of the audience through sense.
This entire description sounds incredibly douchey. Just see the damn movie.
- Status