I think it's up to the game companies to go against them on this kind of thing. It's their product being tampered, even if the consumer is the one being hurt.Testing the boundaries, are they?
--Patrick
Sure, no one's really going to do it. But if you're going to try to make a point, even a joke one, it should follow.Psssst Fade, it's a joke/comic strip.
I think the logic is pretty sound. If they're going to remove something included in a product because it competes with them, why not do it for other competition?Sure, no one's really going to do it. But if you're going to try to make a point, even a joke one, it should follow.
But is that car still advertised as having the protectorate? That's the issue most have. The game was sold as new, with no mention of removed content. And for some, the onlive version may have been a selling point that made them choose that version.Removing the manufacturer's add in window protectant from a new car so you can sell your buyer your own isn't the same as removing what constitutes the core car, like the engine or the seats. Both suck, but that doesn't imply equivalence. It's an argument in extremis. Again, not arguing for GS, just annoyed by the cartoon.
Think of it this way, Fade. Imagine a dealership is getting a shipment of cars from Honda. Honda decides "Hey, lets throw some HD radios in the cars free of charge from Sony!" and they do it. The cars get to the dealership and the dealership notices the radios. The dealership is also owned by an electronics company that may be selling HD radios soon in competition with Sony, so they uninstall all the radios and put a plate over the hole since they don't even have their own radios to add in themselves at that point (they are "still in development"). They then sell the cars for the same price as all the other dealerships that just got the same car with the radios. They didn't just remove an "ad", they removed was counted as a free copy of the game through a streaming service.Removing the manufacturer's add in window protectant from a new car so you can sell your buyer your own isn't the same as removing what constitutes the core car, like the engine or the seats. Both suck, but that doesn't imply equivalence. It's an argument in extremis. Again, not arguing for GS, just annoyed by the cartoon.
Of course. The very customer who come to their stores probably buy console games too (also trade in) with the latest stunt Gamestop pulled (and highly publicized) Gamestop could stand to lose customers. Gamestop is not the only game in town for trades (pun intended) Best Buy is doing it and some other shops (I can't remember them)Wow, they are backpedaling hard right now:
Gamestop giving customers a $50 gift card, other perks for Human Revolution flub
They're also in a real precarious legal situation. Heck, I'm surprised there's not a lawsuit yet.Of course. The very customer who come to their stores probably buy console games too (also trade in) with the latest stunt Gamestop pulled (and highly publicized) Gamestop could stand to lose customers. Gamestop is not the only game in town for trades (pun intended) Best Buy is doing it and some other shops (I can't remember them)
Square Enix kinda fell on the sword for this one. They admitted that they didn't give Gamestop proper notice of the inclusion, so they aren't going to seek legal action against them.They're also in a real precarious legal situation. Heck, I'm surprised there's not a lawsuit yet.
Yeah, any Mom and Pop would... but you wouldn't have HEARD about it if it was a Mom and Pop. Gamestop is the biggest in a sea of giants, not insects. It competes with the likes of Walmart, BestBuy, Amazon... and Square Enix wouldn't have been able to go against any of them without losing a huge amount of money.Gamestop's position as the king of video game retail is to blame for that. Any smaller retailer would have been ripped to shreds.
Slightly off topic: Due to these giants (and a huge success with online stores like Steams and GoG) Mom and Pop shops doesn't stand a chance now-a-days. They just don't have the buying power to keep up.Yeah, any Mom and Pop would... but you wouldn't have HEARD about it if it was a Mom and Pop. Gamestop is the biggest in a sea of giants, not insects. It competes with the likes of Walmart, BestBuy, Amazon... and Square Enix wouldn't have been able to go against any of them without losing a huge amount of money.
Mom and Pop's compete by breaking street dates and offering more in trade-in than Gamestop. They can afford to do this because they have less overhead and don't have to pay for huge shipments of games.Slightly off topic: Due to these giants (and a huge success with online stores like Steams and GoG) Mom and Pop shops doesn't stand a chance now-a-days. They just don't have the buying power to keep up.
Yea but breaking streetdates can get your chance of newer game from that company pulledMom and Pop's compete by breaking street dates and offering more in trade-in than Gamestop. They can afford to do this because they have less overhead and don't have to pay for huge shipments of games.
That happens rarely, at worst. Most of the time it goes unreported.Yea but breaking streetdates can get your chance of newer game from that company pulled
Wow; you're from the East Bay (CV) as well?There's one in my town. Oddly enough, they ripped off GameStop's logo. The store uses the same font and color scheme, except it changed the name to "GameAlley" and substituted green for red.
vs.
I've never been in there. It seems... cheap.
Yeah. Small world, apparently.Wow; you're from the East Bay (CV) as well?