I do not understand shipping rates. They are an indecipherable mystery to me! I recently had to go forgo a purchase, where I would have spent $40 shipping $30 worth of stuff and there was no way to justify that to myself.
Argh.
Argh.
Free to play... tomorrow!So I see DCUO is now free to play. I open up the Playstation Store and download. Start the "game", and ... Now downloading, 18GB remaining.
I have pretty severe allergies myself, to just about everything. When I break out in hives, what works best for me (other than benadryl, which usually puts me to sleep pretty quick), is Gold Bond lotion. Burns for a bit, and then all the itchiness disappears.So, why am I itching myself crazy and taking benadryl, you ask?
Because of a self-inflicted hangnail.
About two weeks ago, I trimmed my middle finger on my right hand just a little too close, and it ended up infected. I was in pain every time I tried to type on the computer (and it was twice as bad, since my last name ends with a "k", so I was hitting the K key every single time), so I went in to see the doc.
She suggested soaking the finger in soapy water and taking something called "Bactrim" - aka trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. Didn't think much of it.
A week later, the finger's doing fine, but suddenly my feet start itching. Feels kinda like how it did when I got chicken pox.
Last night, my back was really itching, too. Didn't think anything of it until I woke up this afternoon - and my stomach had a rash on it, as did my leg and arms.
Guess what? Sulfa drug allergy. Now I'm on Prednisone and Benadryl therapy to relieve the itching and try to reduce the redness.
Meanwhile, I look like I fell into a pit of Poison Ivy.
Now that they have caught up with IE, I think they are going to slow down again.Firefox needs to stop releasing new versions every two weeks. They only seem to make it less stable.
Well, he's right. After Star Wars, Hollywood quit making films and started making movies. Killed "cinema" but saved the industry.Oh, he also views Star Wars as being the movie that killed cinema.
Yep. Which creates the illusion that "back then" had a greater volume of good films.There are obvious pop-pandering piles of manure, but just because something is big budget doesn't mean it wasn't artfully crafted. I also contest that the heady, complex "films" pre-star wars were just about as rare, it's just that those are the only ones anyone really bothers remembering out of the thousands of crappy ones that also existed then.
Art is what I say it is!Oh yay! We get to have another "What is art?" discussion!
With the exception of animated films, and good films that plan for 3D, 3D just takes away from the experience. Especially with loss of color in post production.Just to stir the movie/cinema pot, why are sound and color (both of which were originally dismissed as fads, mind you) significantly able to give the filmmaker a deeper palette to work with to create deeper pieces of film, but 3D is just a fad?
See, that's sensible. If anything kills 3D, it will be the after-thought hatchet jobs they keep putting out.With the exception of animated films, and good films that plan for 3D, 3D just takes away from the experience. Especially with loss of color in post production.
It adds $3.00Because it adds nothing to the film.
I'm saying it about 3D. Have you watched the 3D movies from the 80s? There's a reason this fad vanished for a couple decades. It was just throwing things at the camera. It's not shocking that they're doing the exact same thing with 3D movies today. I'm not saying 3D could never add anything, but I've not seen a single 3D movie that was just as good in 2D, or better because the colors aren't all muddled. Two movies I saw in theaters in 3D, Avatar and Coraline, were just as great on my TV. Didn't miss anything from not seeing Sully's tail awkwardly pop from the screen, or the paper mice not jutting up from the screen when they visit Coraline's room.@QMP- They said exactly the same thing about both color and sound when they were first introduced to films.
That's the part that pisses me off about 3D. I'm lucky my theater has so many screens; I know other people who don't have a choice sometimes to see the 2D version and not spend so much.It adds $3.00
Unless I want to drive 40 miles, I can only see 2D movies... but they cost $3-$5 bucks.That's the part that pisses me off about 3D. I'm lucky my theater has so many screens; I know other people who don't have a choice sometimes to see the 2D version and not spend so much.
Counterpoint- http://www.tested.com/news/news/art...ng-advantages-of-passive-3d-glasses-revealed/Not only does it add nothing of value, 3D on an HDTV cuts the resolution by half.