Export thread

BAN EVERY CHICKEN SANDWICH

#1

jwhouk

jwhouk

Just because it's the only way to be sure.


#2

klew

klew

but then the FDA will take over for Homeland Security


#3

DarkAudit

DarkAudit

You can have my Double Down when you pry it from my cold, dead hand...

Which won't be too long according to my cardiologist.


#4

Eriol

Eriol

but then the FDA will take over for Homeland Security
And then Brawno can buy the FDA and the FTC... and hilarity (and/or Idiocracy) can result.


#5

PatrThom

PatrThom

Not the Wendy's Spicy! Nooooooo!

--Patrick


#6

David

David

Chicken sandwiches have literally never done anything productive in human history. All they do is create fat people with their empty, greasy calories.


#7

Covar

Covar

Chicken sandwiches have literally never done anything productive in human history. All they do is create fat people with their empty, greasy calories.
I do eat them for fat practice.

On a related note Chick-fil-a consistently has the most friendly, polite staff and quality service of any fast food restaurant. I'm amazed at how their employees don't have the typical "I'm dead inside, and fuck off" look that makes me long for the day they're replaced by a machine. Plus I can order through the drive through and not have my order fucked up. Who'd a thought being closed on Sunday would make that big a deal.


#8

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

Who'd a thought being closed on Sunday would make that big a deal.
OOH oooh oooh! Me.

When I started working all businesses in Texas had to be closed at least one day a week. It is so nice for a minimum wage worker to count on one paticular day a week off.


#9

Frank

Frank

I read this somewhere.

"The price of your belief in basic human rights is a fucking fast food chicken sandwich, and you're proud of that? Fuck off and die."


#10

Eriol

Eriol

Wasn't there a story a while back that figured out that the price of most people's personal privacy online was like 50 cents or something? It was if they gave you stuff averaged at about that price, you'd give all your information away.


#11

BananaHands

BananaHands

KFC SNACKAAAAA



#12

evilmike

evilmike

I do eat them for fat practice.

On a related note Chick-fil-a consistently has the most friendly, polite staff and quality service of any fast food restaurant. I'm amazed at how their employees don't have the typical "I'm dead inside, and fuck off" look that makes me long for the day they're replaced by a machine. Plus I can order through the drive through and not have my order fucked up. Who'd a thought being closed on Sunday would make that big a deal.
The staff even seems to be able to handle heckling from the drive thru:


The guy who made and posted the video has since been fired. Apparently, his employer did not appreciate one of its corporate officers drawing them into this issue.

Here is his follow up statement:


#13

Covar

Covar

wow, what a douche.


#14

Ravenpoe

Ravenpoe

wow, what a douche.
He had a good message, and had he just ordered his free water, that would have been the end. But he decided to make a scene on camera, vented his frustrations on entirely the wrong person, and I'm the end made someone who has nothing to do with the corporations policy feel terrible.

At least he apologized, and got that, good for him.


#15

Covar

Covar

He got fired, of course he apologized. He acted like a complete self-righteous asshole who harassed and personally insulted a (presumably) minimum wage employee just trying to do her job and serve him despite the fact that he's not even bothering to have paid for anything. On top of that he was an executive at a company so he certainly should have known better, but hey he's a "nice guy" really.


#16

blotsfan

blotsfan

"I wanted to apologize to her the moment I spoke the words."

Still posts video on youtube


#17

Tress

Tress

He got fired, of course he apologized. He acted like a complete self-righteous asshole who harassed and personally insulted a (presumably) minimum wage employee just trying to do her job and serve him despite the fact that he's not even bothering to have paid for anything. On top of that he was an executive at a company so he certainly should have known better, but hey he's a "nice guy" really.
Kudos to her, though. She handled his bullshit like a champ.

I don't feel an ounce of sympathy for that jackass.


#18

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

You never fuck with anyone that handles your food.


#19

strawman

strawman

You never fuck with anyone that handles your food.
...at least not until they've handed you your food...


#20

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

...at least not until they've handed you your food...
Then don't try to be a steady customer.


#21

GasBandit

GasBandit

BURN EVERY CHEERIO



I believe I speak for everyone previously unaware of the flammability of Honey Nut Cheerios when I say, "Holy shit, dude."


#22

DarkAudit

DarkAudit

Sigh...

This country is really just too stupid to live anymore. :(


#23

blotsfan

blotsfan

Again, why would they post that on youtube?


#24

GasBandit

GasBandit

Again, why would they post that on youtube?
Pink shirt, prominent lisp and other suspect speech mannerisms... mmmmmmaybe a false flag op?


#25

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

Pink shirt, prominent lisp and other suspect speech mannerisms... mmmmmmaybe a false flag op?
not with that beer belly.


#26

GasBandit

GasBandit

not with that beer belly.
Big-Silly-Goose-300x300.jpg


edit - fixed broken img


#27

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

broken linky[DOUBLEPOST=1344363108][/DOUBLEPOST]But if he's "false flag" due to stereotypes, he is strait due to stereotypes too.


#28



Soliloquy

I read this somewhere.

"The price of your belief in basic human rights is a fucking fast food chicken sandwich, and you're proud of that? Fuck off and die."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard that all this started when the Chick-Fil-A owners answered a question by reporters about whether they support the traditional definition of a family or whatnot.

They answered in the affirmative. They didn't say anything specifically about gay marriage, or go on any rants, or anything like that. They just said that this was their view, and everyone pro-LGBT starts rallying in against them (to the extent of the Chicago Mayor denying them the right to open more stores in the city due to their stated views, which is blatantly illegal).

In response to that, all the hateful anti-LGBT people started rallying in their favor.

Meanwhile all Chick-fil-a did was answer a reporter's question and leave it like that.

So if you want to not go to Chick-Fil-A for that, that's within your rights. But unless I'm missing something, Chick-Fil-A hadn't exactly been actively promoting hatred, or even been a symbol of it until everyone reacted to a simple answer to a question during an interview.


#29

Necronic

Necronic

Here's my basic take on it

1) Chick Fil A is a franchise. Therefore the views of the individual franchisee are what matter. There was a franchisee recently who donated a ton of sandwiches to an LGBT parade.

2) What Micheal Jackson, Phil Spector, Roman Polanski, Billy Bob Thornton, OJ Simpson, Garry Glitter, Ty Cobb, or Micheal Vicks did were considerably worse than what's been done here, and I have a hard time believing that anyone has stopped listening to MJ music or watching movies with RP or BBT in them, or completely stopped watching professional sports. Do you still listen to Let it Be? Because the royalties for that pay for a murderers defence lawyer. And I watched the Naked Gun recently, and you know what, I laughed.

Or, how about all the companies that refuse to honor domestic partners in their health insurance policies? That's basically the same thing, except instead of just saying something they are actually hurting people.

3) I like their sandwiches.

Edit: More fun people to look into:

Mark Wahlberg - Committed a hate crime, almost killed someone.

Principle from Ferris Buellers day off (Jeffrey Jones) - bad stuff with kids (look it up)


#30

Covar

Covar

I continually boo Michael Vick when ever I see him on the field, but I'm a Giants fan and would do that if McNabb still played for Philadelphia.


#31

Necronic

Necronic

I'm just saying that this is just a bandwaggon issue. If we applied these moral standards everywhere we would have to boycott just about EVERYTHING. So, instead of being fair and consistent, we simply allow ourselves to be led to specific targets of opportunity.


#32



Soliloquy

Or, how about all the companies that refuse to honor domestic partners in their health insurance policies? That's basically the same thing, except instead of just saying something they are actually hurting people.
I've never even thought about that. That is something worth protesting. Heck, I even know people who are against gay marriage that would get behind a protest against that.[DOUBLEPOST=1344366165][/DOUBLEPOST]
I'm just saying that this is just a bandwaggon issue. If we applied these moral standards everywhere we would have to boycott just about EVERYTHING. So, instead of being fair and consistent, we simply allow ourselves to be led to specific targets of opportunity.
Case in point: Have you eaten at Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, or KFC recently? Then you've supported candidates that are against gay marriage.

I'm sure that other companies everyone uses all the time are the exact same way.


#33

Ravenpoe

Ravenpoe

Again, none of this is news. I've avoided chik fil-a for years because they directly funded several "defense of family values" organizations that I didn't agree with. I didn't like the idea of my dollars going to those groups, so I got my chicken sandwiches somewhere else.

It seems only recent that it's come into the spotlight.


#34

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

OK, what did Billy Bob and Ty Cobb do?


#35

blotsfan

blotsfan

Ty Cobb went into the stands and attacked a guy with only one hand.

http://espn.go.com/sportscentury/features/00014142.html

Also, there are a lot of claims that he was a racist.


#36

Covar

Covar

Ty Cobb was a huge openly racist asshole.

ESPN said:
How mean was Ty Cobb? On May 15, 1912, the Tigers were in New York to play the Yankees. A fan named Claude Lueker, who had lost one hand and three fingers on the other in a printing press accident, was heckling Cobb. The two traded insults for a couple of innings. After one exchange, teammate Sam Crawford asked Cobb if he was going to take that. Cobb charged into the grandstand and proceeded to beat and stomp Lueker. When somebody said he has no hands, Cobb shouted, "I don't care if he has no feet."
Link


#37

strawman

strawman

Here's my basic take on it
Pointing out that there are other greater injustices in the world one might let slide does not indicate that one should give up protesting a lessor injustice. Belittling people because of their hypocrisy is rather shortsighted.


#38

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

That is just Tosh .0 all over again.

And so what about him being a racist or an asshole. He hated everybody. Then opened charity hospitals and took care of old ball players that were stupid with their money.


#39

AshburnerX

AshburnerX

Case in point: Have you eaten at Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, or KFC recently? Then you've supported candidates that are against gay marriage.

I'm sure that other companies everyone uses all the time are the exact same way.
If Taco Bell is in there, so is everything owned by Pepsi AND Frito-Lay, which also includes Subway. It's surprising how far this rabbit hole goes.


#40

drifter

drifter

I've never even thought about that. That is something worth protesting. Heck, I even know people who are against gay marriage that would get behind a protest against that.[DOUBLEPOST=1344366165][/DOUBLEPOST]

Case in point: Have you eaten at Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, or KFC recently? Then you've supported candidates that are against gay marriage.

I'm sure that other companies everyone uses all the time are the exact same way.

That's not a terribly compelling argument. There are lots of reason to support a candidate, and looking at that list, none of them are aimed specifically against gay marriage. You're also overlooking the fact that YUMS! has given money directly to politicians with a pro-gay rights voting record. You just linked to PAC/party donations.

The owner for Chick fil-a, however, has donated millions specifically aimed at that cause.

Ugh, looking through the list he's also donated to the Exodus Foundation, which is one of those "we can rehabilitate the gays" groups.


#41



Soliloquy

Pointing out that there are other greater injustices in the world one might let slide does not indicate that one should give up protesting a lessor injustice. Belittling people because of their hypocrisy is rather shortsighted.
The difference is... this is the same injustice he's talking about, but a more blatantly harmful form than a company owner supporting his beliefs. This bandwagon bashing has accomplished little (and in many ways backfired, since many free speech advocates are taking the side of Chick-fil-a and showing it support)

That's not a terribly compelling argument. There are lots of reason to support a candidate, and looking at that list, none of them are aimed specifically against gay marriage. You're also overlooking the fact that YUMS! has given money directly to politicians with a pro-gay rights voting record. You just linked to PAC/party donations.

The owner for Chick fil-a, however, has donated millions specifically aimed at that cause.

Ugh, looking through the list he's also donated to the Exodus Foundation, which is one of those "we can rehabilitate the gays" groups.
Yeah, looking into it I guess you're right. Chick fil-a is a bit more egregious in its donations.


#42

DarkAudit

DarkAudit



#43

Frank

Frank

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard that all this started when the Chick-Fil-A owners answered a question by reporters about whether they support the traditional definition of a family or whatnot.

They answered in the affirmative. They didn't say anything specifically about gay marriage, or go on any rants, or anything like that. They just said that this was their view, and everyone pro-LGBT starts rallying in against them (to the extent of the Chicago Mayor denying them the right to open more stores in the city due to their stated views, which is blatantly illegal).

In response to that, all the hateful anti-LGBT people started rallying in their favor.

Meanwhile all Chick-fil-a did was answer a reporter's question and leave it like that.

So if you want to not go to Chick-Fil-A for that, that's within your rights. But unless I'm missing something, Chick-Fil-A hadn't exactly been actively promoting hatred, or even been a symbol of it until everyone reacted to a simple answer to a question during an interview.
I think the comment has more to do with the multitudes of morons that came out of the woodwork during it basically saying, "I don't care if Chick-Fil-A hates gays, love that chicken!" and the like.


#44

PatrThom

PatrThom

Seriously, this works, and works well (look at how the music industry is scrambling right now).
The only trouble is getting enough people to go along.

--Patrick


#45

GasBandit

GasBandit

BAN ALL THE BANS


#46

strawman

strawman

BAN ALL THE BEANS
Ftfy


#47

blotsfan

blotsfan

Seriously, this works, and works well (look at how the music industry is scrambling right now).
The only trouble is getting enough people to go along.

--Patrick
I wouldn't call it a boycott, I'd call it more "people always would rather have something for free than pay for it."


#48

Frank

Frank



#49

GasBandit

GasBandit

So the guy who set fire to the cheerios on General Mills' lawn has been fired and is under criminal investigation.


#50

Tress

Tress

So the guy who set fire to the cheerios on General Mills' lawn has been fired and is under criminal investigation.
Probably a good thing. Anyone stupid enough to film themselves starting a fire on the lawn of a major corporate headquarters and then running is probably not someone you want on the payroll.


#51

sixpackshaker

sixpackshaker

I am waiting for that guy to make a freedom of speech argument against his employer.


#52

strawman

strawman

If he was on public property, and performed the burn in a safe, controlled manner it wouldn't have been any different than protesters burning the flag, and thus still a statement protectd by free speech.

However he was on private property, performed the burn in an unsafe manner, and at minimum damaged the landscaping with the fire. Further he left the scene of the fire he started without attempting to alert authorities. It's possible he could be charged with arson.


#53

DarkAudit

DarkAudit

I am waiting for that guy to make a freedom of speech argument against his employer.
:facepalm:
Every person who tries crying "freedom of speech" against private companies neds to be beaten for an hour with a copy of the first amendment...

...wrapped around a baseball bat.


Top