Same here, I've had quite a few strange experiences myself.Due to a personal experience involving my uncle's death, I do believe ghosts exist. However, not the traditional view of ghosts and hauntings.
Seriously, I just got chills from that CG.I've only had one experience in my life that made me REALLY consider things like ghosts. I can't explain it, and I can't convince anyone of what I saw. But I cling to it for some reason. It's one of my most prominent memories.
I was 5 or 6, and I was really scared of the dark at that age. I never had night terrors or any horrible nightmares; I would just scare myself so much that I literally could not close my eyes. I was too scared. Well one night, I crawled into bed with mom and dad (without them knowing; they would have sent me back). I still couldn't sleep, but with them I was never scared. So I just sat up and looked around the room. And I swear, when I looked in their bathroom, I saw a the shadow of a pacing man. He just moved back and forth, then he stopped and looked at me, and then he started pacing again. Surprisingly, I didn't feel scared. I was always finding scary things in the shadows to keep me awake, but there were no windows in that room to make the shadows move. And they were never as vivid as that. I guess I wish I believed in them so that story wouldn't make me feel so crazy. As strong as my imagination is, I can distinguish between what's in my mind and what I feel I could reach out and touch.
Damnit, no one believes me except sometimes Jake, and even when he concedes I think he just doesn't want to upset me.
Sorry, I couldn't resist! I totally heard Pinocchio from Shrek saying this as I read it (modified slightly)I don't have a strong feeling either way. I'm not scared of them or anything but I don't actively doubt they don't exist.
Seriously, I just got chills from that CG.[/QUOTE]I've only had one experience in my life that made me REALLY consider things like ghosts. I can't explain it, and I can't convince anyone of what I saw. But I cling to it for some reason. It's one of my most prominent memories.
I was 5 or 6, and I was really scared of the dark at that age. I never had night terrors or any horrible nightmares; I would just scare myself so much that I literally could not close my eyes. I was too scared. Well one night, I crawled into bed with mom and dad (without them knowing; they would have sent me back). I still couldn't sleep, but with them I was never scared. So I just sat up and looked around the room. And I swear, when I looked in their bathroom, I saw a the shadow of a pacing man. He just moved back and forth, then he stopped and looked at me, and then he started pacing again. Surprisingly, I didn't feel scared. I was always finding scary things in the shadows to keep me awake, but there were no windows in that room to make the shadows move. And they were never as vivid as that. I guess I wish I believed in them so that story wouldn't make me feel so crazy. As strong as my imagination is, I can distinguish between what's in my mind and what I feel I could reach out and touch.
Damnit, no one believes me except sometimes Jake, and even when he concedes I think he just doesn't want to upset me.
The "psychic" I mentioned in my previous post once told me that of course demons are real, that's why there are demonologists.Hey now, I was watching a TV show where they check this stuff out, with science and shit, you know? Thermal readings of abandoned buildings in the fall/winter show them to be colder than other places which means ghosts yo!
They were taking pictures and stuff and white orbs would show up every now and again near reflective surfaces when they used flashes.
The people would even see and hear things off camera that the microphones usually couldn't pick up. How can a man hear something that a microphone can't pick up unless it's a ghost! You can't put things that are unprovable one way or another on TV man!
Ergo (note to self find out what ergo really means) ghosts are real!
The "psychic" I mentioned in my previous post once told me that of course demons are real, that's why there are demonologists.Hey now, I was watching a TV show where they check this stuff out, with science and shit, you know? Thermal readings of abandoned buildings in the fall/winter show them to be colder than other places which means ghosts yo!
They were taking pictures and stuff and white orbs would show up every now and again near reflective surfaces when they used flashes.
The people would even see and hear things off camera that the microphones usually couldn't pick up. How can a man hear something that a microphone can't pick up unless it's a ghost! You can't put things that are unprovable one way or another on TV man!
Ergo (note to self find out what ergo really means) ghosts are real!
I don't think scepticism works that way...Now I'm a 100% skeptic of the paranormal, however, I still really enjoy reading about it.
I don't think scepticism works that way...[/QUOTE]Now I'm a 100% skeptic of the paranormal, however, I still really enjoy reading about it.
I don't think scepticism works that way...[/QUOTE]Now I'm a 100% skeptic of the paranormal, however, I still really enjoy reading about it.
I don't think scepticism works that way...[/QUOTE]Now I'm a 100% skeptic of the paranormal, however, I still really enjoy reading about it.
How do you believe in something that's been proven?!Skepticism is also only believing in things that have been sufficiently proven (unlike ghosts). Or, in other words, not believing.
How do you believe in something that's been proven?![/QUOTE]Skepticism is also only believing in things that have been sufficiently proven (unlike ghosts). Or, in other words, not believing.
Most skeptics I know have absolute faith in their own beliefs and only try to disprove the beliefs of others.[/QUOTE]No, a true skeptic can hold beliefs (and should) but allow for the possibility that they are wrong and actively seek more information to disprove (rather than confirm) beliefs, both their own and others. Of course, if something cannot be disproved at all (like ghosts), then the default position is likely to be disbelief.
Most skeptics I know have absolute faith in their own beliefs and only try to disprove the beliefs of others.[/QUOTE]No, a true skeptic can hold beliefs (and should) but allow for the possibility that they are wrong and actively seek more information to disprove (rather than confirm) beliefs, both their own and others. Of course, if something cannot be disproved at all (like ghosts), then the default position is likely to be disbelief.
yay SMBC!Also, this thread needs more comics.
THat's pretty much what agnostics are, I think.I always thought skeptics allowed for the possibility of things but were refraining judgment until there was more proof.
Fence sitters, I call em.
THat's pretty much what agnostics are, I think.[/QUOTE]I always thought skeptics allowed for the possibility of things but were refraining judgment until there was more proof.
Fence sitters, I call em.
Pretty good advice for religion and science.Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.
-- Buddha
The more I find out about Buddha, the lesser I think about Jesus.Even religious figures can be skeptics:
Pretty good advice for religion and science.Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.
-- Buddha
And "no" on the ghosts, since there isn't any solid evidence to support their existence.
Does one necessarily imply the other?I don't. I'm an atheist all the way. This implies i don't believe in the mere possibility of ghosts coming back from wherever.
You're dead, you're done. that's it.
I'm pretty sure i can prove that i'm hitting you in the face with a baseball bat while i'm hitting you with it...Nothing is ever scientifically proven. There is evidence that supports a given theory but no such thing as proof.
I'm pretty sure i can prove that i'm hitting you in the face with a baseball bat while i'm hitting you with it...Nothing is ever scientifically proven. There is evidence that supports a given theory but no such thing as proof.
I'm pretty sure i can prove that i'm hitting you in the face with a baseball bat while i'm hitting you with it...Nothing is ever scientifically proven. There is evidence that supports a given theory but no such thing as proof.
I'm pretty sure i can prove that i'm hitting you in the face with a baseball bat while i'm hitting you with it...Nothing is ever scientifically proven. There is evidence that supports a given theory but no such thing as proof.
Or God can even ask you to be skeptical in scripture:Even religious figures can be skeptics:
Pretty good advice for religion and science.Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.
-- Buddha
[/QUOTE][17:36] You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them.
Sorry to disappoint but it's from the Quran.[/QUOTE]holy crap ame, is that from the bible?? Please tell me it's from the bible so I can memorize the numbers and throw them out whenever someone uses the bible as an excuse for being irrational.
Sorry to disappoint but it's from the Quran.[/QUOTE]holy crap ame, is that from the bible?? Please tell me it's from the bible so I can memorize the numbers and throw them out whenever someone uses the bible as an excuse for being irrational.
fixedWait...are you guys saying that God might not hate bags?
fixed[/QUOTE]Wait...are you guys saying that God might not hate bags?
The Bible does have a lot of stuff about false prophets and the devil being able to look like an angel too, so it's not all about blind faith either.Ames said:Sorry to disappoint but it's from the Quran.
Ehh... as i recall the dead sea scrolls showed that the old testament had very few changes in it, mostly stuff that could easily be atributed to translation errors.The bible has changed form a lot over the years. I wouldn't get too excited Calleja.
Yeah, i guess that gravity being a fact and the theory of gravity are different things... which is what i was saying when i posted that wiki link (of which i was just using the part before the Content tab, the theoria vs action thing).Making an observation is not proving anything. When you say something is proven, there has to be a thing that you are referring to that is proven. Those things are theories. In your link to the wikipedia article on Theory, "proven" appears twice and in both cases it is in reference to things being proven false. We can demonstrate a theory is unworkable (false) or we can maintain that a theory still works with our observations, however a given theory should never be said to be true.
Wait, are you saying heliocentrism isn't proven?! And Darwin's theory that new species arise from existing ones through small changes over time wouldn't be proven if you would actually observe that happen?!Making an observation is not proving anything. When you say something is proven, there has to be a thing that you are referring to that is proven. Those things are theories. In your link to the wikipedia article on Theory, "proven" appears twice and in both cases it is in reference to things being proven false. We can demonstrate a theory is unworkable (false) or we can maintain that a theory still works with our observations, however a given theory should never be said to be true.
Very spooky. I did well yesterday night deciding no to read this thread until the morning.Snippage
Theory: The Earth revolves around the Sun and not the other way around.@lien:
fact: things fall
theory: gravity
The theory tries to explain a fact, but is not a fact itself.
I'm pretty sure Heliocentrism was backed up by proof even before we went into space (it's called math) etc...It's just a matter of words then. What you are calling a theory is called a hypotheses in science, where a theory is an explanation that has been sufficiently backed up by proof.
You are simply wrong here. A hypothesis is a prediction that is derived from a theory. Theories beget MANY predictions. One thing a hypothesis is not is an explanation for a phenomenon.A hypothesis is an untested theory, but that doesn't mean that a theory can't get invalidated by even more testing.
From your last link:
I added the emphasis.3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.
Holy crap! Science understanding fail award goes to you.A hypothesis is an untested theory, but that doesn't mean that a theory can't get invalidated by even more testing.
I tried to do that with so many things that happened in my grandmother's house. But, no amount of wishful thinking makes a persistent cough of a 70+ year old woman that warrants a trip to the ER (having had walking pneumonia diagnosed for myself when I was experiencing the same thing) suddenly go away. Medically explainable? Possible, but I'd venture a guess that it's unlikely. Wishful thinking doesn't make a queen sized bed with a (then) 200 lb man roll 6" on it's own (no, I didn't include that in my novel), nor does it make something violently strike the bed that I'm laying on.I find that most ghost stories or spooky happenings in my family are the results of wishful thinking or stress based on loved one's deaths. I dunno, I just don't believe in any of it. I've had fucked up spooky times in my house, but nothing that just couldn't be easily explained. I just don't believe there's this magical spirit energy left over when we die.
I find that most ghost stories or spooky happenings in my family are the results of wishful thinking or stress based on loved one's deaths. I dunno, I just don't believe in any of it. I've had fucked up spooky times in my house, but nothing that just couldn't be easily explained. I just don't believe there's this magical spirit energy left over when we die.
Yeah, I've heard stories like that, and it turned out to be the calls of foxes (which, to be fair, are pretty goddamn eerie). In fact, I think that was the result on Destination Truth or a similar show at one site. They've come up with a couple of very reasonable explanations for possible cryptids - in Egypt, this supposed monster was, in all likelihood, a large feral dog, as there was a population of such in the fields outside a few villages. Feral dogs can be very vicious and are known to attack people. Another, the "Nandi-bear" I think it was called, in Uganda was, by all evidence, a misidentified hyena - the description of the creature was quite hyena-like and the team caught footage of a hyena stalking their base camp.We went to investigate a haunted cemetery once. It was supposed to be haunted with the ghost of a woman, who screamed all night as she relived her death over and over or something like that.
When we got there, it took about 20seconds for us to realize the place was just a hotspot for screech owls.
(Short answer: No. But I don't deny the paranormal either. Not outright. I just think there's likely othe explanations, and for now I take some interest in hearing the unexplained stories.)
Auditory hallucination - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaI believe in ghost. When I was growing up the bedroom I slept in was the same bedroom that my grandmother died in. One night it was just me and my mom at home and we were watching tv (always got an erie feeling in the back of the house, but that's beside the point) and I needed something from my bedroom, just as I rounded the corner I started hearing two females talking to each other clear as day (no it wasn't the tv it was clear across the house), scared the bejebus out of me because I wasn't expecting it and I never did go get whatever it was I wanted.
The funny thing about life is that, unlike in videogames, you gain XP from losing too, sometimes even more then from winning.SilverJelly said:@lien, I don't know what your field of expertise is, but you are discussing with scientists. If I was in your position, I would have left the discussion long ago. They are and epic mob.
Ehh... i'm pretty sure that in order for for a theory to come into existence someone needs to think of it, and hypothesis basically comes from the greek words for "to suppose". I do guess nowadays starting up wholly original theories is rarer and it might not come up, and most hypotesises would simply belong to existing theories etc.You are simply wrong here. A hypothesis is a prediction that is derived from a theory. Theories beget MANY predictions. One thing a hypothesis is not is an explanation for a phenomenon.
Theory: Mass bends space-time so that other objects are drawn to each other.
Hypothesis: If I drop a ball, it will fall to the Earth. <- NOT a theory, a prediction. It has even been tested!
Ok, i should have put "basically" there to imply it's a gross simplification.Chaz said:Holy crap! Science understanding fail award goes to you.
Actually that thing about the "Earth is flat" being a thing 2000 years ago was a misconception last time i checked...Here's some Actual Slides™ I use in my Geology 101 class about this very topic: http://egg.louisiana.edu/~jack/science.pdf
Actually that was kinda what i was thinking of when i said it was a misconception...Hmm how do we assess this? Are we going by what the average person thought or what educated people thought? Even today there is quite a disparity there back then probably even more so.
Well I did say "common knowledge" in the presentation.
Oh man, this happens to me a lot right as I'm falling asleep! It's so spooky... I dream a lot at night, and usually I'll have those falling dreams that wake me just as I'm drifting off. The falling is usually accompanied by some sort of loud voice. Not supernatural, but still weird. And kinda fun.