I'd rep her again if I hadn't yesterday. Someone said something similar to Charlie a while ago, but without links, so it probably got washed over with Chaz chazzing it up.
I wish I hadn't gone back through some of these pages. My opinions of certain people have dropped severely.
Charlie not being one of them. Charlie's at this stage in his social awareness where he's latched onto an idea and is clinging to it for dear life like a rockclimber with a sword in his teeth and a foot in his mouth beyond it. You see this most often with college freshmen, just breaking the surface of new ideas on culture and society, and in their excitement and zeal, they start mapping out the lines of battle (such as this poll) without realizing that there's no war happening around them. Because the ideas are not new to people--there's a crawl of development that society takes, and one more tool hopping up and down, screaming and flinging shit like a monkey isn't going to change minds. It never does. But this is a normal stage that people go through, where their minds are expanding and ideas are taking shape in lighter forms before they mellow out into reality. I went through it when I was 16. People often go through it 18-20. Some, much later.
I remember one of my first classes in college, Intro to Lit maybe, where one kid started ranting and raving suddenly about societal collapse and government problems and blah blah socialism blah. The professor let him get it out of his system, about a minute and a half. "Okay," she said in a blank tone, and then resumed talking about what our reading schedule would be. The kid's rant had nothing to do with the professor's words or anything we were doing. He looked around, as if he expected everyone to rise from their seats cheering, ready to march wherever that promising leader would bring them, but no one did. They paid attention to what was important (the class at hand) and let him sit quietly like he was supposed to. Because he couldn't grasp the difference between discussion and shouting.