God, I know.That would require that the rich and powerful face consequences for their actions, and that's not how this country works.
God, I know.That would require that the rich and powerful face consequences for their actions, and that's not how this country works.
Well sure, you could do that IF YOU WANT THE LIBERALS TO WIN, FUN SIZE!I guess the obvious solution is to not give in the first place.
I mean...Well sure, you could do that IF YOU WANT THE LIBERALS TO WIN, FUN SIZE!
That's when you kinda have to envy the genuinely religious. At least he'd get what he deserves in the next life.The punishment he deserves.
Interesting angle you've got there.I've heard kings get beheaded, sooooo.....
But he is not pro-gun. He banned bumpstocks and said that we should take people's guns and do due process later.Trump represents open intolerance of anything they don’t like and pro guns.
That’s all the freedom they want.
Don't try to confuse these people with facts, they have their preconceived notions and that's good enough for them, so it should be good enough for you!But he is not pro-gun. He banned bumpstocks and said that we should take people's guns and do due process later.
It doesn't matter. None of these people think about the things they say, it's not about beliefs. All they need is an answer, any answer, to screech in response, and if those damn libs get upset that their screeching makes no sense all the better.What’s with this conservative talking point about the 1st Amendment on social media? We all know it doesn’t apply here, so why has that become their rallying cry?
Only those peoples' guns.But he is not pro-gun. He banned bumpstocks and said that we should take people's guns and do due process later.
I don't mind banning bump stocks, but the due process shit pisses me off!Don't try to confuse these people with facts, they have their preconceived notions and that's good enough for them, so it should be good enough for you!
And neither can he.Yeah everyone knows desks can't tweet.
--Patrick