I think the dream was Justice League (I think most casual fans know DC big 3 better.) But we got Avengers instead. And I am not complaining, because Warner Brothers will not be able to pull this off.The Avengers. It's been every superhero fan's dream for decades.
I've lost all faith in WB.I think the dream was Justice League (I think most casual fans know DC big 3 better.) But we got Avengers instead. And I am not complaining, because Warner Brothers will not be able to pull this off.
And to shock them that Disco would be used in a movie again.Moulin Rouge!
For a visual and probably also accoustic overkill sensation.
Wouldn't watching the previous MCU movies be necessary to really appreciate the Avengers though?The Avengers. It's been every superhero fan's dream for decades.
To quote Eddie Izzard's character from Mystery Men: Disco is NOT dead!And to shock them that Disco would be used in a movie again.
"This is how we make mezzo-forte movies in the mezzo-forte future!"Snakes on a Plane.
I think Frozen as a story would have been less impressive to viewers then because the Disney Princess thing wouldn't really be hammered into Disney or our society until another 10 years had gone by, so Frozen wouldn't have a cultural norm to counter.Frozen.
*watches Zero Esc's head explode*
EDIT: Head-explosions aside, if I remember my Disney history correctly, it was around 1984 they decided they were going to integrate CG into their animated projects. I think it would be cool to show them where it's heading.
I don't think so. Godzilla vs Destoroyah was supposed to be the final Godzilla movie by Toho. The aim became for Paramount to pick up the franchise anew, but had that not happened, Toho might have just quit entirely. They only made Godzilla 2000 because the 1998 American movie was so bad that it tarnished Godzilla's good name.I would go to 1995 and show Toho the American "Godzilla" film. That film was so bad it caused them to make a new godzilla series the year after, so theoretically if I were to show them the movie- BEFORE it was released we'd get like three more godzilla flicks.
Agreed about the Princess part, but Frozen becoming the highest grossing animated film of all time is an anomaly for today as well as back then, since even in 2013, only 15% of Top Films have female leads and only 30% have women in speaking roles, despite making up 51% of the population and 52% of movie ticket purchasers. And sadly that's much higher than it was in 1984.I think Frozen as a story would have been less impressive to viewers then because the Disney Princess thing wouldn't really be hammered into Disney or our society until another 10 years had gone by, so Frozen wouldn't have a cultural norm to counter.
Yeah! And while we're at it, we'll tell them that all restaurants are now Taco Bell.Come to think of it, it'd be fun to troll them and show them The Room. Then tell them that movie culture has movie towards this and they're ALL like this, now.
Dude, WE still don't even know how that would work!We will have to look amused when they can't figure out how that would work.
"Who is this Baz Luhrmann and what has he done to my play?"Blowing Shakespeare's mind by showing him film adaptations of his work and showing how far theatre and acting evolves.
True, but keep in mind:Agreed about the Princess part, but Frozen becoming the highest grossing animated film of all time is an anomaly for today as well as back then, since even in 2013, only 15% of Top Films have female leads and only 30% have women in speaking roles, despite making up 51% of the population and 52% of movie ticket purchasers. And sadly that's much higher than it was in 1984.
They should know that 30 years later, film execs still don't think that women can carry a successful film, and they're still wrong.
But I thought the point of the thread was to impress film aficionados? In 1984, an entirely CG film was unheard of, not to mention the level of technical sophistication that it uses. Not to mention, in 1984, people were wondering if the House of Mouse was going to survive. The 9 Old Men had left, the new class had yet to produce a hit animated film, Don Bluth had left to form his own (reasonably successful) studio and there was a big overhead change: Michael Eisner and Jeffery Katzenberg were brought it to try and turn the Disney brand around. Even then, they wouldn't have a hit animated movie until 1989 with The Little Mermaid. Couple this with the highly-publicized flop of The Black Cauldron later in 1985, there was talk that Disney could be done for good. I'd argue that bringing both The Little Mermaid and Frozen, which managed to be made even though Disney had closed their main animation studio in the early 2000's in similar dire straights, is important to prove Disney can AND does bounce back and produce the blockbuster, all-audience films we take for granted today.True, but keep in mind:
1. People kept going back to see it partly because it was memorable to them, and I feel part of that is because it surprised them the first go-round.
2. It wouldn't have made near that much in 1984 due to inflation .
Johnny Depp what he's become, mister "I only do movies I feel good about, artistically"?On a separate note, I've always wondered what it'd be like to go back in time and show soon-to-be famous creators some of their best (and maybe worst) work that they haven't created yet. Somehow with the addition that they'd forget after I left so as not to affect the time stream or something, but show them a copy or their greatest work, or maybe even movie adaptations of their work.
Like, showing a young Terry Bolea some of his greatest matches as Hulk Hogan.
Showing a frustrated Jack Kirby how beloved and well-known he is today, especially all the people inspired by his work.
Showing George Lucas the original trilogy at that point where he's trying to sell the idea to studios, to show him yes, it'll work.
Blowing Shakespeare's mind by showing him film adaptations of his work and showing how far theatre and acting evolves.
Showing a frustrated Jack Kirby how beloved and well-known he is today, especially all the people inspired by his work.
That's fine; I'm just saying that bringing up its box office status doesn't mean anything in this context. All those reasons you're mentioning now are good ones.But I thought the point of the thread was to impress film aficionados? In 1984, an entirely CG film was unheard of, not to mention the level of technical sophistication that it uses. Not to mention, in 1984, people were wondering if the House of Mouse was going to survive. The 9 Old Men had left, the new class had yet to produce a hit animated film, Don Bluth had left to form his own (reasonably successful) studio and there was a big overhead change: Michael Eisner and Jeffery Katzenberg were brought it to try and turn the Disney brand around. Even then, they wouldn't have a hit animated movie until 1989 with The Little Mermaid. Couple this with the highly-publicized flop of The Black Cauldron later in 1985, there was talk that Disney could be done for good. I'd argue that bringing both The Little Mermaid and Frozen, which managed to be made even though Disney had closed their main animation studio in the early 2000's in similar dire straights, is important to prove Disney can AND does bounce back and produce the blockbuster, all-audience films we take for granted today.
I know everyone seems to have a big stiffy for Mermaid, but it was Beauty and the Beast that made me start taking Disney seriously.[Disney] wouldn't have a hit animated movie until 1989 with The Little Mermaid.
Yeah, I was pretty critical of Disney at the time.I know everyone seems to have a big stiffy for Mermaid, but it was Beauty and the Beast that made me start taking Disney seriously.
--Patrick