The difference between grain-fed and grass-fed is what part of the plant is being eaten. Corn-fed cattle are fed off the corn kernels. Grass-fed eat the whole plant stalk. This causes a major difference in digestion, leading to corn-fed animals having higher bacteria counts in their gut, leading to e-coli contamination problems. This also leads to metabolic changes, where corn-fed beef has lower amounts of Omega-3 fatty acids, and higher amounts of Omega-6s. This means that grass-fed beef and dairy have numerous health benefits, while corn-fed is neutral at best.I think corn is a kind of grass related to wheat.
It's not entirely like that. I think, as a society, the sheer amount of meat consumption should be lowered. Not entirely taken out, since that might be impossible for some. But at the very least, a lower consumption. It's the amount of resources used to process this stuff. Either the acres of land just to maintain the animals or the resources to ship the meat, etc.If you're doing it to "put a dent in the food industry" or "to help against it" or anything "noble" then you're doing it for the wrong reasons.
We've been buying smaller farm meats lately and holy crap is the chicken and steak 10x better. It's a little more expensive but it's so worth it.At the very least, if I do buy meat, it'll be something made on farms that treat the animals better.
Again, if you're doing it for the health reasons? Then good on you. If you're doing it otherwise, I would just facepalm. You sound like you're doing it for the right reasons but it does sound a bit like the other.At the very least, if I do buy meat, it'll be something made on farms that treat the animals better.
It's less about "screwing the man" and more about the fact that processed food and the way it's handled is harmful to society. Because of processed food, people might be eating meat, sure, but it's processed to no end. I used to eat a lot of processed crap. Now, I look at the health information on those and see how bad they are. Ridiculously fatty and greatly high on sodium (for long-distance shipping and keeping it on the shelves longer).
My sister has been getting us grass-fed beef by mail order and at a local farmers market. It's so much tastier. She gets good chickens as well, and we buy our eggs from a local place just a mile or so away. We buy raw milk from a farm near here, and used to get goat milk kefir from another farm, until they became so popular it was difficult to get some before they ran out.We've been buying smaller farm meats lately and holy crap is the chicken and steak 10x better. It's a little more expensive but it's so worth it.
...The time has come to bake a pie. Reading that just made me so ready to roll out some dough!blueberry pie for dessert.
Absoultely not, just don't think it's accomplishing anything more than you feeling good about yourself.Well, theres nothing wrong with wanting to avoid something you find reprehensible Nick. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise, even if they think it's stupid.
So what happens when it comes time for chicken and dumplings?I want to have my own chickens someday
Amen, this weekend has been an orgy of meat and dairy!I've fallen off the wagon hard for this holiday weekend
Heh. It is a rough journey for sure. There are a lot of meat eaters than non meat eater in the U.S. (especially in Texas. We are steak country after all)Nick, this is a journey which you must take alone, for I can not join you on this road.
I don't care if it sounds gay or not: I. Love. Meat.
That would be horrible, do you know much better off we are as a society when everyone doesn't have to spend all our time growing and killing our own food?If people had to kill the animal they ate, and we went back to an agrarian economy, well, things would certainly be different. You'd have to legislate it to make it happen though. And McDonalds has enough cash to buy out each and every public official several times over, so it's not terribly likely to happen..
Well, I will say that frog meat is a little too sweet for my palate. But for most of the other stuff, I'm good to go.Having actually slit the throat of a pig and hung it from the rafters of my grandpa's shop while we separated the guts into different milk crates depending on what he wanted to do with them when I was 10, I fully, fully continue to enjoy eating pork, beef, chicken, horse (once, it was ok, Like super bitter beef), fish, crustaceans, mollusks, rodents on occasion, ungulates in general and the occasional bear. Just put me down for most mammals, lizards, birds or even an amphibian or 2.
I assume you're kidding, but there is a steak expert that can tell you by eating a steak if the animal died in fear or not. Logically, it makes sense, since the fear response releases chemicals into the bloodstream which would potentially appear in the meat. Quite interesting, really.If it wasn't panicking in fear of the prospect of its own death, I don't enjoy eating it. Not saying I WON'T eat it... but the musk of terror is such a delicious spice.
The Morning stuff is not bad. But if you want decent meat sub, go to Asian market, they have nice stuff.I assume you're kidding, but there is a steak expert that can tell you by eating a steak if the animal died in fear or not. Logically, it makes sense, since the fear response releases chemicals into the bloodstream which would potentially appear in the meat. Quite interesting, really.
Nick, feel free to PM me for any guidance I can offer. I've been through most of the pain in the ass stuff, particularly with regards to weeding out meat substitutes that suck.
Seems to me that the deer I've shot that didn't die instantly (and I subsequently had to track it for half a mile) should have been pretty damn terrified. Still tasted good. Now, I'm no medical expert, but seeing as how one of the first things that we do is to drain the blood, for the adrenaline or what-have-you to change the flavor of the meat, it'd have to be soaking a lot longer than just a few seconds of fight-or-flight. I could easily believe that an animal that lived it's life in fear could taste different, but a few seconds of terror before being completely exsanguinated?I assume you're kidding, but there is a steak expert that can tell you by eating a steak if the animal died in fear or not. Logically, it makes sense, since the fear response releases chemicals into the bloodstream which would potentially appear in the meat. Quite interesting, really.
Ohh I see, I misunderstood. It's kind of a "wine tasting" thing where somebody can guess the year and vineyard.It isn't, and he didn't say it tasted worse - just different.
The expert deeply inhales the steam from the steak, carefully cuts a small part off the portion, inspects the grain briefly, then chews thoughtfully for severeal seconds.Ohh I see, I misunderstood. It's kind of a "wine tasting" thing where somebody can guess the year and vineyard.
That is how I imagine it.The expert deeply inhales the steam from the steak, carefully cuts a small part off the portion, inspects the grain briefly, then chews thoughtfully for severeal seconds.
Carefully patting his lips with the linen napkin and removing the piece from his mouth, he declares with some authority, "This animal was shot through the left ventricle of the heart, and, after stumbling for many seconds, lost consciousness. The hunter immediately dressed the animal without waiting or moving the animal long distances. The fatal wound, having killed the animal quickly, suggests a large calibre weapon."
The small gathering claps politely while another platter is placed before him...
I think frog tastes fine, my problem is all the fiddly little bones that you have to eat around. I propose engineering chicken-sized frogs to solve this problem.Well, I will say that frog meat is a little too sweet for my palate. But for most of the other stuff, I'm good to go.
What was it eating to get that big, I wonder... other frogs?I've seen frogs of that size. I was walking down a stream and saw a frog that was a little bit larger than a football sitting in the middle of the creek. I thought it was some porcelain trash, from its size and the way its green skin was glistening in the dappled sunlight beaming through the forest. I poked it with a stick intending to flip it over to see where it was made... It then leaped nearly a dozen feet down stream... and I nearly crapped my pants.
Hasn't this been fairly strongly disproven by multiple studies? I will find some links.I'm firmly opposed to vegetarian diets, because I don't believe they're as healthy as those that contain meat and fish. "Lacto-ovo" vegetarian is better, since milk and eggs can provide many of the same nutrients as meat, but trying to balance a purely vegetarian (or worse, vegan) diet to get the essential fatty acids found in meat is difficult, if not impossible (depending on your existing health).
Nick, while I support you wanting to do this for moral reasons, I don't think it's a wise choice from a health perspective. Just my advice.
And those studies were disproven by other studies, which were disproven by... and on and on. Meat is part of a healthy diet. Vegetarian diets can be healthy, but they take more work and are not a viable option for all people.Hasn't this been fairly strongly disproven by multiple studies? I will find some links.
I was just going to mention. If you have to take Dietary supplements and Vitamins to make up for nutritional gaps you're not eating a healthy diet. Doesn't matter if it's carnivorous or vegan.And those studies were disproven by other studies, which were disproven by... and on and on. Meat is part of a healthy diet. Vegetarian diets can be healthy, but they take more work and are not a viable option for all people.
99.9% of the time it's usually because the vegetarian is being smug about being a vegetarian.Hasn't this been fairly strongly disproven by multiple studies? I will find some links.
Added at: 02:23
I don't know how to say this without hurting feelings or without it feeling like I'm attacking, but I have an idea that the veg = unhealthy argument grows out of people who feel defensive about their decision to continue to eat meat. Every vegetarian I know has been attacked verbally at some point by meat eaters, sometimes viscously. I think it's because people view their decision as a condemnation of the meat eating lifestyle (and it is, really, whether they mean it to be or not).
I'm not so sure about that cyclical disproving thing. There's a fairly weak argument for example about protein that is more or less an urban legend. I will agree that it takes more work, but that's more cultural. The world of procurement and preparation is geared toward a meat diet.And those studies were disproven by other studies, which were disproven by... and on and on. Meat is part of a healthy diet. Vegetarian diets can be healthy, but they take more work and are not a viable option for all people.
If you're still talking about protein, then you're behind the latest studies. The biggest arguments are about fats now.There's a fairly weak argument for example about protein that is more or less an urban legend.
That's because no one knows just how delicious stegasaurii taste.No one would mess with a stegosaurus.
Is that a quality or quantity thing? It seems like you could get more than enough fats from nuts/seeds/fatty fruits.If you're still talking about protein, then you're behind the latest studies. The biggest arguments are about fats now.
The only thing I'm talking about is the biggest argument I hear against vegetarianism.If you're still talking about protein, then you're behind the latest studies. The biggest arguments are about fats now.
Isn't that the whole point of being vegan?If we're throwing out anecdotal evidence, I've never met a Vegan who wasn't a pretentious douche about it.
Quality. Getting enough fats from vegetal sources is not a problem. Getting the right fats, especially essential fatty acids, actually digesting them, processing them, and then using them in the body's system is another problem all together.Is that a quality or quantity thing? It seems like you could get more than enough fats from nuts/seeds/fatty fruits.
Well, in my experience the biggest argument for or against just about anything often turns out to be a strawman. It's the smaller arguments, taken as a whole, that really tell the story.The only thing I'm talking about is the biggest argument I hear against vegetarianism.
Do you think they could accommodate me? I could bring them a signed note from my doctor telling them I can't eat a vegetarian diet if they'd like.If they invite me over, however, they certainly don't take into account that I eat meat and provide a meat dish for me.
I know you're doing it on purpose, but the easy argument against that is that you've not eliminated vegetables entirely. And besides, we concede many things to guests based on their quirks, not just diet.Well, for one thing, if I invite a vegetarian friend over for dinner, I am expected to provide a vegetarian meal for them.
If they invite me over, however, they certainly don't take into account that I eat meat and provide a meat dish for me.
Fuckin' a right.99.9% of the time it's usually because the vegetarian is being smug about being a vegetarian.
Not a single vegetarian. I do get the feeling that people referencing vegetarians as smug are using real life examples.I would challenge any of you to re-read the last three pages and count how often the vegetarians are acting as pompous douche bags vs. the meat eaters doing so.
The people I've known that went vegan eventually admitted they were only doing it as a political statement.Not a single vegetarian. I do get the feeling that people referencing vegetarians as smug are using real life examples.
Blame PeTA. They're the ones out there pushing the vegetarian agenda the loudest.My point was simply that I am reading that meat eaters attack vegetarians for being "smug assholes", a claim that is itself an attack, unprovoked by an actual vegetarian saying anything at all. This is pretty much commonplace around here, and why I avoid these conversations in general.
Damnit, Fun Size!I would, but they won't accept my meat.
It depends on the vegetarian. If you encounter one that doing it for health, then you don't see the "smugness" but some vegan are doing it for political, those are the one who are "smug" (PeTA is a good example)My point was simply that I am reading that meat eaters attack vegetarians for being "smug assholes", a claim that is itself an attack, unprovoked by an actual vegetarian saying anything at all. This is pretty much commonplace around here, and why I avoid these conversations in general.
I've never been really comfortable with the label "omnivore." Omni means "all," and I don't feel qualified to claim the omni prefix until in addition to being carnivorous and herbivorous, I'm also lithovorous, sanguivorous and saprovorous at the very least.The people who eat meat eat both because humans are omnivores. We eat lot's of dishes that have no meat in them and as long as we don't label them as vegetarian we wouldn't even think about it.
"Omni" may mean all but "omnivore" just means they eat both plants and animals.I've never been really comfortable with the label "omnivore." Omni means "all," and I don't feel qualified to claim the omni prefix until in addition to being carnivorous and herbivorous, I'm also lithovorous, sanguivorous and saprovorous at the very least.
Or a biochemist.... like me....I think we may need to get a biologist and possible a chemist into this conversation.
this is what I think (again, I'm just an IT guy who was a vegetarian for 15 years but quit 6 years ago)
Your body requires certain nutrients. How you get those nutrients or the quantity require for everyday "survival" is questionable. There are people in the world who live off in different diet. The only one that I'm personally familiar with is China. I have family who lives there who rarely eat meat (cause it is expensive and hard to get) and they eat veggies and fruit (a lot of it) and are pretty healthy. My grandmother is over 90 years old and still pretty mobile and healthy.
Now eating meat is NOT a bad thing (nutrient wise) they do contain a lot of nutrients that your body needs. Of course the argument is that we can get similar nutrient from other sources other than meat. This is where the debate lies. What type of nutrients does your body REALLY need in order to survive, what does it need to thrives? what does it need to be active? (active = working out, body building, heavy outdoor/indoor activities.
It only means that because of a widely (ok, universally) accepted misapplication of the prefix. I think a better term would be multivore (eater of many) instead of omnivore (eater of all)."Omni" may mean all but "omnivore" just means they eat both plants and animals.
That dur statement aside somewhere in the world there are humans that eat pretty much anything. After all this time I can make an educated assertion that you are a human. I wouldn't bet my life on it though.