I'm amazed the Ventrilo server still works at all. Apparently it expired in June and they stopped charging my credit card. It was supposed to stop working July 4thBut I don't like change
Here's their answer:Call me the paranoid one, but how does Discord make money? Advertising? Or what? Basically, there are other solutions that people can self-host, or make yet another login to a SaaS site where our information (and even our conversations now) are... theirs? Or whom?
So yes, this is paranoia, but why is this a "go to a 3rd party" situation and not a "set up our own server" one?
Wondering how we’ll make money? In the future there will be optional cosmetics like themes, sticker packs, and sound packs available for purchase. We’ll never charge for Discord’s core functionality.
You don't have to use it either, it's mostly an issue to people who regularly use voice chat, which was 4 or 5 of us. If you didn't ever use Vent, you can also continue to not use Discord.Fair points from both @stienman and @DarkAudit on this one. I guess I'm just "worried" about what we're giving up. If we're giving up control over how the server is run, I'm OK with that (works to a benefit in fact). I'm less OK with giving up control over my personal information and/or the information I put INTO the service itself, like my voice, text, etc. There is of course some degree of that by virtue of participating in a forum at all, but it feels different to give it up to a larger entity.
As I alluded to above, this is more about feelings (ie: paranoia) than anything else. Not questioning from a technical perspective.
I agree that is worth considering, and as you allude to, there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. We are most certainly "paying" for this service by providing these things. If this is too high a cost, someone will have to step up and provide the resources for something better with more privacy.Fair points from both @stienman and @DarkAudit on this one. I guess I'm just "worried" about what we're giving up. If we're giving up control over how the server is run, I'm OK with that (works to a benefit in fact). I'm less OK with giving up control over my personal information and/or the information I put INTO the service itself, like my voice, text, etc. There is of course some degree of that by virtue of participating in a forum at all, but it feels different to give it up to a larger entity.
As I alluded to above, this is more about feelings (ie: paranoia) than anything else. Not questioning from a technical perspective.
While I don't generally disagree with the sentiment, it's worth having a discussion and finding out if more people would participate with stronger guarantees, then we can decide if we can better accommodate everyone, rather than restricting it to those who have lower privacy requirements.You don't have to use it either, it's mostly an issue to people who regularly use voice chat, which was 4 or 5 of us. If you didn't ever use Vent, you can also continue to not use Discord.
So....We're looking for someone with the technical skill and knowledge to set up and host a voice chat server...who can take a couple of groin kicks and is willing to do so for the amusement of a few...with plenty of free time...invested in the community...perhaps a bit of a masochist....Gee, I wonder where we're ever going to find someone like that.If we tried to do it all in house and/or just foot the bill, that's all but demanding that life kick the person responsible for that in tender areas. Sometimes repeatedly.
My point is really more one of, if you weren't using voice chat before, when we paid for a Vent server every month, why does switching to another service suddenly affect you? I don't imagine there will be a sudden surge in the amount of people actually using it (that will last more than a few days), but maybe I'm wrong.While I don't generally disagree with the sentiment, it's worth having a discussion and finding out if more people would participate with stronger guarantees, then we can decide if we can better accommodate everyone, rather than restricting it to those who have lower privacy requirements.
My "cliff's notes" are from directly reading Discord's Privacy Policy: https://discordapp.com/privacyI'd guess you should start with their terms of service to find out exactly what they can collect, record, and how they might use it and distribute it. If you read it and provide a cliff notes version here it might help everyone understand what the costs really are.
Translation: We collect absolutely every piece of data you send us in text, but your audio isn't processed speech-to-text or kept at all, we just use it to forward along to the other clients. (The "to enable communication delivery only" part says they don't record your audio. There is a Rebuttal to this analysis on Reddit from the company, but even if they're not doing this now their "Privacy Policy" would allow them to do it if they wanted IMO)Information You Provide: We collect information from you when you voluntarily provide such information, such as when you register for access to the Services or use certain Services. Information we collect may include but not be limited to username, email address, and any messages, images, transient VOIP data (to enable communication delivery only) or other content you send via the chat feature.
Translation: We know where you are, and what people are connecting to what sites/forums and how they associate with each otherData We Collect Automatically
Translation: Oh ya, in aggregate, we share everything we have with anybody in our advertising networks. (Note: THIS is where they get their money right now, not from "optional add-ons" as their features page says IMO)Aggregated Information
Translation: If you connect your other social networks to us, we scrape those and associate that with your internal profile to keep better track of what you like/dislikeInfo through other Services
Translation: Like many companies, we track you EVERYWHERE you go on the web through beacons, and if you keep our cookies we can still probably track you even if you're logged out.Cookies: ... In addition, we use technologies such as web beacons and single-pixel gifs ...
Translation: If you sign up, you will get more spam because of what we share with our advertising partners. You can try and opt out at the links provided, but that will probably just confirm your email information, making you get even more spam as then your email address is triple-confirmed as correct.Advertisements
(Keep an eye on this definition below...)The Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates (the “Related Companies”)
Translation: We're not going to sell your information! Really! Except... all these places where we'll sell your information. Our "Related Companies" means anybody we have a contract with, therefore anybody! (This is kind of like "Free Trade" agreements, where the first line is "There will be free trade between Countries A, B, C... H except for... and then there are 300 pages of exceptions.)Our Disclosure of Your Information
The Company is not in the business of selling your information. We consider this information to be a vital part of our relationship with you. There are, however, certain circumstances in which we may share your information with certain third parties, as set forth below:
...
Related Companies: We may also share your information with our Related Companies for purposes consistent with this Privacy Policy.
We already know GBs office falls apart if he's away for longer than a weekend. Sometimes over lunchtime. What happens if the owner ODs on fukitol and shuts down the entire operation? Or decides to (yeah, right) expand and ships GB off to, say, Welch?So....We're looking for someone with the technical skill and knowledge to set up and host a voice chat server...who can take a couple of groin kicks and is willing to do so for the amusement of a few...with plenty of free time...invested in the community...perhaps a bit of a masochist....Gee, I wonder where we're ever going to find someone like that.
I was being sarcastic, to be clear.We already know GBs office falls apart if he's away for longer than a weekend. Sometimes over lunchtime. What happens if the owner ODs on fukitol and shuts down the entire operation? Or decides to (yeah, right) expand and ships GB off to, say, Welch?
Not just him. With any of us running it in their spare time, we're at the mercy of job, family, and general life demands that could shut the entire operation down before it gets started. Better to have a team whose entire reason for being is the voice chat system, and where one person's drama doesn't send the whole thing crashing to the ground.
Doesn't mean I don't want them to try to ship GB off to Welch.I was being sarcastic, to be clear.
I think putting him in charge of a Welsh station in Texas would also be amusing.Doesn't mean I don't want them to try to ship GB off to Welch.
The text chat has wound up replacing the IRC channel on Slashnet as well.I'm with Dei on this one. It was mostly meant to move the people who were in ventrilo every night. People who weren't are free to join-or-not as they see fit according to their level of comfort. But as I see it, if you have a facebook/google account you regularly log into, you're already exposed as much (or more) as Discord would have you be. At least Discord doesn't have access to your GPS coordinates
If Discord starts pushing ads or something, then we can burn that bridge when we come to it.
You know, it was never clear to me how people who ran IRC servers profited, eitherI would like to say that I would've been in the IRC channel...if I'd bothered to set up any IRC clients SINCE NINETEEN NINETY-TWO.
--Patrick
I love how "easy" you think it is to scale multi-server applications. Oh how I wish that were true!As a side note, I get the impression that, when it comes to Discord, the concept of having a "server" is entirely virtual - scratch that, entirely PERCEPTUAL. Even on ventrilo, I'm sure our "server" wasn't its own box but rather one of umpteenbajillion virtual "servers" running on a physical machine. It seems to me that Discord takes it even a step further, where each "server" doesn't even require its own separate virtual space. Really, the concept of a discord server is just a filter that controls who gets what communications, when really everybody who uses discord anywhere are all connected to the same server cluster, and they swap out the word "channel" for "server," and then let you break up your channel into rooms for text and voice chat.
Thus, the entire thing is instantly and effortlessly scalable with no human action required on Discord's end, which I imagine saves them a lot of money. All they have to do is check up on the server cluster every now and again, and when it's getting toward the top end of its capacity, stick another one in the cluster. This topology would mean that physical boxes don't go to waste with one box getting hammered by all the busy users and another box being in charge of 30 "servers" that do nothing but idle for months. Very efficient.
When discord first came out, I, too, was leery of adopting it, but as it's been out a while now (launched in 2015) and I haven't heard any instances of walls bleeding and chains shooting out of puzzle boxes, I'm comfortable giving it a try and moving over. Everything is subject to change, though, if we have issues or find it unsatisfactory, we can explore other options, including going back to a paid ventrilo server. But so far, I'm liking discord a lot more than Ventrilo - and I really liked ventrilo.
I especially like that it comes with its own overlay and the thing just goddamn works Looking at you, teamspeak, ya shitheel.
I didn't say "easy," I said "efficient" though I did also say effortless and that's probably a bad word for what I meant, as I didn't mean it to say "easy" but instead meant it to say "does not require human administrator intervention."I love how "easy" you think it is to scale multi-server applications. Oh how I wish that were true!
Hint: it isn't. This has been and still is part of my business I do for "real money." Even if your users have a seamless front-end, it's NEVER as simple as you say. It's a great idea though. Wish it worked like that in practice.
Long discussion not needed for here, but even what you say here isn't accurate for the VAST majority of even how virtualized environments work. But it's quaint how easy you think it is. It's a testament to how easy engineers like me and others who work in these realms make it look to the end users.I didn't say "easy," I said "efficient" though I did also say effortless and that's probably a bad word for what I meant, as I didn't mean it to say "easy" but instead meant it to say "does not require human administrator intervention."
But yeah, the backend software is definitely going to be way more complicated than I can grasp, but the point I was making was that it was probably more efficient for hardware outlay, thus keeping the bottom line lower, and letting them run at overall lower costs because they're not having to overprovision machines, and underutilized discord "servers" don't stake claim to resources that don't get used.
Thus, with lower overhead, they need less capital, and have more freedom in determining income streams.
Well, I'm happy to have provided you the opportunity to be smugly condescending then.Long discussion not needed for here, but even what you say here isn't accurate for the VAST majority of even how virtualized environments work. But it's quaint how easy you think it is. It's a testament to how easy engineers like me and others who work in these realms make it look to the end users.
Ya pretty much. I'm getting into DM mode for @Dirona, @Squidleybits, and @HCGLNS tonight!Well, I'm happy to have provided you the opportunity to be smugly condescending then.
For those that didn't know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web
It's only fair you spend some time on the other end of the discussion now and again.Well, I'm happy to have provided you the opportunity to be smugly condescending then.
I made a separate chat channel for it.Hey, so I've been thinking about coordinating Pokemon Go raids through the Halforums Discord. Already done a couple in the general channel, and would continue to do so provided there's no opposition to it. Is that all right?