I disagree. Regardless of who goes on to score, the game should have been over on that goal. If the ref gets lucky enough that Chicago wins in spite of his terrible, terrible call, that doesn't change that it was in fact that bad.[DOUBLEPOST=1369883122][/DOUBLEPOST]Well, there we go. At least Detroit didn't get the win out of it.Conditional on if Detroit goes on to win I think
If you're trying to goad me into responding, all I'll say is that it would have been nice to not be without Filppula just because Shaw didn't think he needed to play today, but regardless, the better team won.Well, there we go. At least Detroit didn't get the win out of it.
Nope, purely in response to the shitty ref costing Chicago the earlier goal that would've won them the game.[DOUBLEPOST=1369884904][/DOUBLEPOST]Also:If you're trying to goad me into responding, all I'll say is that it would have been nice to not be without Filppula just because Shaw didn't think he needed to play today, but regardless, the better team won.
Fair enough. Hockey dance party truce?Nope, purely in response to the shitty ref costing Chicago the earlier goal that would've won them the game.
"The refs will protect me!"Pens may have just given away the series there with that Malkin-Bergeron fight.
Good God, what was Crosby thinking, jawing at Chara?
Pens may have just given away the series there with that Malkin-Bergeron fight.
Good God, what was Crosby thinking, jawing at Chara?
Hey, Vancouver, what did I tell you?
You clearly aren't listening:
http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/...fs-to-interview-eakins-for-head-coaching-gig/