Moderately Nefarious. I did not know that about myself.
#8
GasBandit
Also moderately nefarious.
The fact that my sliders are all quite far to the right makes me wonder if there's actually any steps between "moderately nefarious" and whatever they call a complete monster.
I think that may be because the questions that relate to that score are worded poorly. The few I read (the test bored me for this reason) phrased things like "is it wise to . . ." Instead of "would you"
I may accept machiavellan tactics work, but it doesn't mean I would consider applying them, so I'd have likely rated as machiavellan Because I was pedantically answering the questions as presented
"Moderately Nefarious" sounds like the name to a web-comic about asupervillain who isn't that bad a guy and barely does anything bad. HOLD ON-*checking* okay its not a comic yet- DIBS!
#23
GasBandit
I think the upper and lower limits for the "moderately nefarious" description are a little too broad. I think "infrequently vile" might need to peg a little higher, and whatever comes after "moderately nefarious" needs to start a little lower.
#24
Dei
Quite frankly, I am shocked that I am the least evil person in this thread. I guess the lack of narcissism is a rare trait in these parts.
I think the upper and lower limits for the "moderately nefarious" description are a little too broad. I think "infrequently vile" might need to peg a little higher, and whatever comes after "moderately nefarious" needs to start a little lower.
All the questions on the first page are testing Machiavellianism, the second page is testing narcissism, and the third page tests psychopathy.
#29
Zappit
Infrequently vile, with very low psychopathy.
I'm rather proud of that.
#30
Squidleybits
I want to take the quiz not experience life the Rolex way!!! Omg!!!![DOUBLEPOST=1449267781,1449267550][/DOUBLEPOST]Moderately nefarious and not buying a Rolex.
I want to take the quiz not experience life the Rolex way!!! Omg!!!![DOUBLEPOST=1449267781,1449267550][/DOUBLEPOST]Moderately nefarious and not buying a Rolex.
Wasabi wants to be rated less evil, sees the designated Terrik Shooter is only "Infrequently vile," so obviously shooting Terrik must be positive Karma. Thus, Wasabi shoots Terrik.
#37
Dei
But Wasabi is also Infrequently Vile, pretty sure she's trying to raise it.
Exactly. I figured a sneak attack would raise my evilness. Plus taking your job right out from under you should boost my evil score.
#40
GasBandit
Oh, I thought I'd read she was also Moderately Nefarious. Ah well. JOKE RUINED
#41
Cajungal
Also infrequently vile.
#42
jwhouk
#43
Gared
Moderately nefarious. I should work on my Machiavellianism, it's a bit lower than it could be.
#44
Frank
Infrequently Vile with Michiavellianism by far the highest.
Probably because I'm exceptionally manipulative and probably why I'm so good at my job and so bad at long term relationships.
#45
Bones
wut....guess that explains a lot....
#46
Bubble181
Moderately nefarious.
#47
Simfers
I got infrequently vile. Machiavellianism (holy shit that's hard to spell) slightly to the right, narcissism dead centre and psychopathy slightly to the left (roughly as far to the left as mach was to the right).