More graphic warning on Cigarretts boxes?

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

makare

My sister was on my side trying to get my mom to quit for years. Then she started smoking at 14. People can know the danger and still do it.
 

Cajungal

Staff member
Am I an odd duck when it comes to cigarettes?
I think it does affect people differently. My mom quit when she was young. Dad was going to the store, and he said, "Cigarettes?" She thought for a moment and said, "Nah." I've known people who are hurting after 20 years and people who can smoke one and take it or leave it. I guess you're lucky.
 
Am I an odd duck when it comes to cigarettes? I'll smoke a pack like every year or year and a half without any cravings what-so-ever. In college, I went through a pack a week, smoking socially, but it was completely correlated to going out drinking. I never really had a craving for them, it was more of a habitual thing - something to fiddle with while at the bar. I don't need a cigarette to get through the day or get my fix; when I'm offered one, I'll light up. My cigarette count for 2011 so far has been like 10 total and one cigar.

Personally, I prefer to roll my own cigarettes if given the chance. My sister rolls her own tobacco, grown locally. No additives or weird chemicals, just the dried plant. It's actually pretty awesome, similar to a good cigar. She's very much the same way I am about it though. Her and her husband have a 2 oz bag of tobacco a farmer gave her in like 2008.

As far as the scare tactics go. Yeah, it works well with teenagers, which are the group that really should be monitored from getting hooked early on. There are studies that link chain smoking to how early you start.
You sound like someone who sometimes enjoys one as opposed to someone who's addicted to them fortunately. It happens, and I suppose plenty of teens think that will be them--until it isn't. Biology's an odd thing.
 
My aunt tells me that she still gets cravings for cigarettes. She's 50, and she quit when she was around 25. :\
I know people that quit who can't stand the smell of a cigarette any more... of course i guess that doesn't mean they don't get a craving.
Added at: 07:12
You sound like someone who sometimes enjoys one as opposed to someone who's addicted to them fortunately. It happens, and I suppose plenty of teens think that will be them--until it isn't. Biology's an odd thing.
Smoke enough and you get addicted, some people probably just have a higher tolerance...
 
C

Chibibar

If I offended you, I'm sorry. I have quite a bit of friends who either have quit cause they can't afford it (find other stuff to do like video games), health reasons, and some are still addicted to the stuff. I believe that some of my friend who did manage to quit is pretty much the sheer will to quit. It is hard, but it can be done, but it is pure will.

The other method is chemical treatment but those are hard, expensive, and sometimes ineffective.

Also instead of spending millions of dollars on ads, why not spend that money on clinics? to me, I just think it is not as effective (but that is just me)
 
Am I an odd duck when it comes to cigarettes? I'll smoke a pack like every year or year and a half without any cravings what-so-ever. In college, I went through a pack a week, smoking socially, but it was completely correlated to going out drinking. I never really had a craving for them, it was more of a habitual thing - something to fiddle with while at the bar. I don't need a cigarette to get through the day or get my fix; when I'm offered one, I'll light up. My cigarette count for 2011 so far has been like 10 total and one cigar.
I'm exactly the same way.
 
If I offended you, I'm sorry. I have quite a bit of friends who either have quit cause they can't afford it (find other stuff to do like video games), health reasons, and some are still addicted to the stuff. I believe that some of my friend who did manage to quit is pretty much the sheer will to quit. It is hard, but it can be done, but it is pure will.

The other method is chemical treatment but those are hard, expensive, and sometimes ineffective.

Also instead of spending millions of dollars on ads, why not spend that money on clinics? to me, I just think it is not as effective (but that is just me)
It's not that I was offended (so no worries) as much as it seems that when people talk about alcoholism, pain killer addiction, or addiction to hard drugs like meth and coke, they talk about how hard it is to quit, and how horribly addicting these drugs are, and how horrible it must be to be chemically dependent on these substances; but when people talk about smoking cigarettes, they talk about how smokers are choosing to destroy their lives or refusing to quit, and how raising the price of our drug source or showing us nasty pictures is supposed to magically make us less chemically dependent upon it.
 
C

Chibibar

It's not that I was offended (so no worries) as much as it seems that when people talk about alcoholism, pain killer addiction, or addiction to hard drugs like meth and coke, they talk about how hard it is to quit, and how horribly addicting these drugs are, and how horrible it must be to be chemically dependent on these substances; but when people talk about smoking cigarettes, they talk about how smokers are choosing to destroy their lives or refusing to quit, and how raising the price of our drug source or showing us nasty pictures is supposed to magically make us less chemically dependent upon it.
I understand. I post on this thread cause I think the whole "nasty picture" isn't going to work. It is not a magic fix.
 
I should start a tobacco company that harvests only the highest quality tobacco plants farmed by Indians that still follow ancient customs and their medicine man personally blesses each leaf then sell then at 100 bucks a pack. Think I would have any takers?
 
C

Chibibar

I should start a tobacco company that harvests only the highest quality tobacco plants farmed by Indians that still follow ancient customs and their medicine man personally blesses each leaf then sell then at 100 bucks a pack. Think I would have any takers?
In this day and age? I am sure you can actually sell it. There are always people who are eccentric enough to buy that :)
 
J

JCM

Such pictures have been on brazilian cigarette boxes, and it show a significant drop, specially among teenagers, who's rather not have to look at a dying man whenever he reaches for a cigarette.



However, it also has become part of our culture and jokes, for example;

A "mineiro" (guy from the state of Minas Gerais, the equivalent of a blonde in most jokes) asks for a box of cigarettes, looks at the cover and sees a picture of a burned out cigar and the words "SMOKING CAN CAUSE SEXUAL IMPOTENCE".

He then looks at the store owner and says "Can't you just give me the one that causes cancer?"
 
Now those are better then the ones over here that have a guy's neck bloated and black... looks way too over the top and is easier to dismiss then...

Minas Gerais
Brazil is on Middle-Earth?
 
O

Overflight

Oh God, why did you have to remind me of that.

Aykroyd, dude! What the hell HAPPENED to you? :facepalm:
 
So I wonder how many people that support this are against requiring the viewing of an ultrasound before getting an abortion?

And regarding the effectiveness, remember no one in government actually wants everyone to stop smoking. They get their money from the taxes, plus get an EVIL issue to fight and campaign against.
 
C

Chibibar

So I wonder how many people that support this are against requiring the viewing of an ultrasound before getting an abortion?

And regarding the effectiveness, remember no one in government actually wants everyone to stop smoking. They get their money from the taxes, plus get an EVIL issue to fight and campaign against.
personally I think it is a waste of money.
 
C

Chibibar

So is taking care of under and uninsured smoker's end of life medical needs.
That is where my socialist side come into play. I think everyone should have equal access to medical need as long they are citizens. Not a citizen, sorry bub, you better have insurance then.
 
Seriously, I get addiction, and it sucks. And I think society has a role in the health and help of its people, but also you bear most of the personal responsibility for those choices. If you choose to smoke, and I choose to avoid that, or vice versa, why should the non-smoker pay for the smoker's expensive health treatments?
 
It's a complex question. It may be easy to decide when you're talking about an obvious poor choice like smoking that has a huge, huge end of life cost, but there are a lot of issues where the balance is much more difficult.

Same question, different line. How do we balance personal freedom vs personal choices incurring a cost on society.
 
C

Chibibar

It's a complex question. It may be easy to decide when you're talking about an obvious poor choice like smoking that has a huge, huge end of life cost, but there are a lot of issues where the balance is much more difficult.

Same question, different line. How do we balance personal freedom vs personal choices incurring a cost on society.
It is a good question and got me thinking quite a bit, but alas, I don't have the answers.

The only closest thing I can think of is a draconian method of society. If you are willing to hurt yourself, you are on your own, but that goes against my personal nature. I try to help people when I can, but lately I don't stop for strangers on the road anymore (if they have car issues), or give our change to beggers (illegal in Dallas). I do help random people when they are short on money at a restaurant, but I notice I am more weary of people in the world after reading stories about how some good Samaritan are robbed trying to help people with "car trouble"
 
So video games and certain websites are a source of gore and violent imagery, but we can put bloody chunks of lung on cigarette packs and make people considering abortion go through coffee table books of foeti?

Hypocracy!

--Patrick
(yes, that's intentional. It's a portmanteau)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top