Can't believe I'm saying this but I understand Norris now. Despite the fact that I've explained that it was just a personality descriptor (not intended to bring in the entire plotline), you guys insist on bringing in all this baggage from the movies and even casting me as the males in the movies. This is exactly why I suggested dropping it and realizing I'm just talking about a personality I like. Not being an idiot, I realize perfectly well that being attracted to someone solely because they have something you like only works in the movies. But I'm not attracted to just those isolated 1-D parts.
In a way this was helpful, because you guys kind of pointed out a lot of things that aren't wrong, and made me reword them, You never really addressed some of the things that make this most tempting because you're so focused on the movie connection. There are things that no amount of talking with my wife (which I have done, even with professionals present) will ever fix, because they're not broken. No talking will ever replace the thrill of being with someone new, which now I see is probably the primary attraction. My advice to myself, then, is to find the new thrill in a long term relationship. To focus on what makes that good. Somehow. I don't know how to do that yet, but I'll learn.
I do appreciate the stuff about trust. That is a good point, and not something that you think about when you're in the heat of being attracted to someone. I need to focus on what this would do to my wife.
For the record, this was a post-mortem discussion. I actually shut down the advances, but I did it because it was morally correct (sorry to disappoint your clairvoyance, ElJuski). I just wanted to get a feeling for the roads not taken.