Export thread

http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/102/1021437p1.html

I really really hope this doesn't affect the future of this game, I've waited oh so long

NO!! NO!!! NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FUCKING HARMONY FUCKING GOLD!

God those fucking parasites need to fucking die already. We get it. You made a very shady and likely incredibly illegal deal with a Japanese company 30 years ago for Macross rights they seemingly had no right to sell you.

Robotech fucking sucks. IT FUCKING SUCKS. It makes no fucking sense.

God, FUCK HARMONY GOLD.

Maybe fucking with Microsoft will get them what they deserve and people will actually investigate their stupid bullshit they've been pulling longer than I've been alive and the world can finally see the fucking end of those people.

Thats pretty much what I wanted to say, to emotional though...

Frankie++;

Somebody needs to drown harmony gold in a tub full of their lawyers' fecal matter. And how did we get that fecal matter? Fresh squeezed from the disemboweled intestines, of course.

"On the flip side, it could also simply result in specific characters, logos, or other trademarked material from being included in the final product."

Is this a poorly written sentence, or am I just dyslexic today?

There's nothing wrong with that sentence that I can see.

This fucking sucks. Great, no Marauder, Rifleman, Warhammer etc.. AGAIN.

I thought this shit had been ironed out years ago.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Agrama

Founder of Harmony Gold and at one time indicted for tax fraud in his native Italy. SWELL GUY.

Meh, i always though most of the "from anime" designs looked out of place among the more machine like mechs of BT... the Warhammer did fit though.

But what about the Project Phoenix redesigns, couldn't they use those instead, or are they too different?

GasBandit said:

There's nothing wrong with that sentence that I can see.

Click to expand...

That you say that really makes me worry that I'm losing my mind. It seemed to me that

"..., it could also simply result in x, y, or z from being included ... "

should be

"..., it could also simply prevent x, y or z from being included ... "

or

"..., it could also simply result in x, y, or z being excluded ... "

Yup, something does seem to be missing from the sentence... but maybe in Texas that's how they talk?

EDIT: bah I am not even going to pretend to know proper sentence structure hehe.