She's only incompetent if she loses.While it may not explicitly contain the exact phrase, the 1st Amendment is clear in prohibiting the government from basing laws or policies on religion. I'm amazed that a candidate for the US Senate doesn't understand that. She has to be one of the most incompetent politicians I've seen in a while. How in the world did she get this far anyway?
She's only incompetent if she loses.[/QUOTE]While it may not explicitly contain the exact phrase, the 1st Amendment is clear in prohibiting the government from basing laws or policies on religion. I'm amazed that a candidate for the US Senate doesn't understand that. She has to be one of the most incompetent politicians I've seen in a while. How in the world did she get this far anyway?
She's only incompetent if she loses.[/QUOTE]While it may not explicitly contain the exact phrase, the 1st Amendment is clear in prohibiting the government from basing laws or policies on religion. I'm amazed that a candidate for the US Senate doesn't understand that. She has to be one of the most incompetent politicians I've seen in a while. How in the world did she get this far anyway?
After her opponent comes up with something closer to the actual wording (not the exact words unfortunately), she seems to ask disbelievingly if the first amendment says that. Check at about 7:15 into the video.To be fair, the phrase "seperation of church and state" isn't in the constitution, its from some letter of Thomas Jeffersons I think. Now what is in the constitution is the first ammendment's establishment clause (I think that's what its called), which is pretty straightforward. Sad that a serious contender for office can get away with saying stuff like that.
She's only incompetent if she loses.[/QUOTE]While it may not explicitly contain the exact phrase, the 1st Amendment is clear in prohibiting the government from basing laws or policies on religion. I'm amazed that a candidate for the US Senate doesn't understand that. She has to be one of the most incompetent politicians I've seen in a while. How in the world did she get this far anyway?
She's only incompetent if she loses.[/QUOTE]While it may not explicitly contain the exact phrase, the 1st Amendment is clear in prohibiting the government from basing laws or policies on religion. I'm amazed that a candidate for the US Senate doesn't understand that. She has to be one of the most incompetent politicians I've seen in a while. How in the world did she get this far anyway?
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina!I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
Heh.I totally take that to mean that she sacrificed her virginity to some Proto-Wican Doofus. I doubt they had a box picnic there.
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
The only wasted vagina is an unused vagina![/QUOTE]I see her and I can only think, "what a waste of a vagina."
I feel lust in a completely different organ, so it's all cool.The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery.
The funny thing is that the Bible quote she's thinking of is about lust for another man's wife... using her logic from the op video she can masturbate as much as she wants as long as she's not thinking of another woman (that's married).Also, I am totally on board with that ad she did on masturbation:
I feel lust in a completely different organ, so it's all cool.The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery.