The browsers all have them. Your phone has one. There are countless standalone apps at whatever price point you like. Chrome has started warning me about my password habits, so I'm spending my down time the next couple of nights taking care of that. The only problem with that is I have other browsers standing by in case something craps the bed on one, I can test on another. Meaning I've got a whole other stack of passwords to keep track of. And none of those browsers are on my phone.
When 1password had their "Oops, the app is free instead of $60!" moment a few years back, I gave it a try. Wasn't great, but it came in handy for when I needed certain passwords that the browsers wouldn't save on their own (looking at YOU, Chrome and Google!). But the browser extension was mostly crap.
So now that Tom Scott has come out in favor of Dashlane, I thought I'd give it a try. It imported all my Chrome, Firefox, and Edge passwords, and now I can get to work culling duplicates and fixing security holes. I've found a lot of compromised passwords on my list are for sites that are long since dead, or have changed to a new model that doesn't take logins. So that saves a bit of work, I guess?
So... are you letting the browser of the moment do all the work, with the duplication of effort that can cause, or are you putting all your eggs in one password manager basket? Is that a bad metaphor?
When 1password had their "Oops, the app is free instead of $60!" moment a few years back, I gave it a try. Wasn't great, but it came in handy for when I needed certain passwords that the browsers wouldn't save on their own (looking at YOU, Chrome and Google!). But the browser extension was mostly crap.
So now that Tom Scott has come out in favor of Dashlane, I thought I'd give it a try. It imported all my Chrome, Firefox, and Edge passwords, and now I can get to work culling duplicates and fixing security holes. I've found a lot of compromised passwords on my list are for sites that are long since dead, or have changed to a new model that doesn't take logins. So that saves a bit of work, I guess?
So... are you letting the browser of the moment do all the work, with the duplication of effort that can cause, or are you putting all your eggs in one password manager basket? Is that a bad metaphor?