In politics, like much of the rest of life, you can compensate for all kinds of deficiencies with a massive overabundance of confidence.How did this guy get elected in the first place? Does he have an awesome platform or something?
Pretty much. A lot of his original campaign was centred around stopping the Light Transit Rail plan, which wound up costing TWICE its cost to remove than it did to begin the infrastructure that had already started. And he wanted a war on bicycles (you can imagine why I voted against him). The first thing he did was remove the Jarvis St bike lane, which had only been put in the year before, and that also cost twice to remove what it cost to put in.In politics, like much of the rest of life, you can compensate for all kinds of deficiencies with a massive overabundance of confidence.
Toronto is a very cyclist-friendly city. Its cycling infrastructure worked (and to a point, still does) The people that didn't support it didn't live in the core downtown area. His arguments were absolutely ridiculous.He would have gotten my vote.
Figures.Totally. For all sorts of (poorly reasoned) reasons. He was 'set up', he's 'just a guy', 'we all make mistakes', 'his personal life is none of our business', etc, etc.
You hear that guys, Justin Trudeau is exactly like Rob Ford.“Our Government does not condone illegal drug use, especially by elected officials while in office, including Justin Trudeau. We'll continue to work with all levels of government on shared priorities, such as jobs and economic growth. That includes working with mayors and city councils, including the Mayor of Toronto and Toronto City Council.”
Cavalier about illegal drug use? Well, ya. Except Justin is saying everybody should do it.You hear that guys, Justin Trudeau is exactly like Rob Ford.
So, you think it's noble and not the pathetic mudslinging the Conservatives have been doing since Trudeau was made Liberal leader.Cavalier about illegal drug use? Well, ya. Except Justin is saying everybody should do it.
That may or may not be a good thing. Pot is different than Crack. No doubt. But at the same time, under the law, they are very very similar. But one is ignored (or celebrated) and the other is a reason to dump a guy from office. Rob is at least saying "ya I've done it while drunk, and I'm not proud of it." OK. Does he do a decent job as Mayor? How does this affect it? "St. Justin" however apparently can do no wrong. It's not even discussed that what he's doing now is illegal.
Huh? I thought the breaking the law part was the part about Ford people hated. Or is it just that they hate him, and want an excuse?
I personally don't care that much about the Man. I actually kind of like seeing Toronto implode. But it's the "similar actions are pilloried or celebrated based upon your political views" by the media of this country shows a lot more disturbing things. Are we just all completely resigned to the fact that the media is horrifically biased? We all know it, but is it not even a thing to attempt not to be?
Deserved mudslinging then? I dunno, I think that if you stand up for political office, it means there's a new target for the mud and you have no right to complain. On any side.So, you think it's noble and not the pathetic mudslinging the Conservatives have been doing since Trudeau was made Liberal leader.
One good thing about these ads is that we're NOT the ones paying for them. Of that I'm grateful. Let them spend/waste their own campaign money on it. And we have a lot better finance laws than in most places in the world. So if their parties want to spend money on it, go nuts.Ugh, negative attack ads are rarely truthful. They don't air out any real issues. They're always just spun half-truths paid for by you and me. They're a waste of time and money and thankfully, according to the public's reaction to the recent Conservative ones, doing the opposite of what they are intended.
They only seem to be doing a good job of showing what classless goons we have running this shit show.