Yes but apparently when you defend anything Apple you must be trolling. So way to go you troll.I've never trolled. I just defend my position
While Luiza and I love the ipad, iphone and up to two years back I used mostly Macs (now that I rarely draw and have a kid, so its a cheaper Sony Vaio for me), Steve Jobs is pretty much a despicable boss in any way possible.That's really the crux of it. Most of the Apple users I've talked to start frothing at the mouth if you utter one disparaging word against Steve Jobs.
Added at: 12:47
I'm pretty sure the iPad 2 is going to get the "Jobs" touch.
Yeppers. I was stienman previously on these forums, going back to the image days: http://halforums.wikidot.com/stienman Cajungal, at some point in the past, said she thought First Lady Puffinstuff would be a great name, so I stole it and have been using it since. It amuses me.OK, now I'm really confused (and way behind the times). First Lady P is a dude named Adam?
Thanks. I haven't been able to spend much time there, unfortunately, but I'm glad to see there's another outlet for some questions that simply don't belong on SO. It's too bad it's not a little more free-form, but a line has to be drawn somewhere.By the way FLP congrats on programmers.stackexchange.com making it out of beta. I had my doubts at first, but it's proved to be a valuable and viable SE site.
Sorry I should have added "to me". But seriously, what justifies the $1000+ price hike over a powerful PC or handheld device?Now see Bones? ^Thats trolling.
$1000 + price hike on what?Sorry I should have added "to me". But seriously, what justifies the $1000+ price hike over a powerful PC or handheld device?
Thats totally fair and actually one of the reasons I do use a Mac, because I can run windows and OSX (and linux for you mouth breathers out there ) on it.i was mistaken, i retract my statements, i assumed the line about the ipad being like satellite tv vs sticking a paperclip in the coax jack to be a bit overzealous. apparently i was mistaken, i retract my statements. also if mac wanted me as a customer they would offer their software for use on any rig, i would gladly use it if this was possible, as it is I am not buying ANOTHER computer just to use the operating system for the few things i would need it for.
I agree. I mean, I love having a lot of choices, but when it comes down to it, am I going to be able to notice the speed difference between a 2.6 and a 2.8 Ghz processor when I'm firing up Word? Apple's tiered approach makes a lot of sense.I think you hit the nail on the head, they don't offer a lot of in between, but again thats part of the idea of maximizing the user experience which might be frustrating for some but its one of the reasons why satisfaction rates are so high for mac users.
All those caveats aside, here's the bottom line: Strictly on the basis of specs and features, your money will go further with a Windows laptop than with an Apple laptop, whether you have $1000 or $2000 to spend.
But does that mean MacBooks aren't a good value? That's where subjectivity comes into play. In my opinion, MacBooks, with the exception of the white $999 model, are indeed good values. I've owned both Macs and Windows PCs since the early 90s, and my Macs have tended to last longer and give me far fewer problems. And Macs are simply a joy to use, thanks to the Mac OS's many ingenious features and Apple's design savvy. I've rarely felt that way about a Windows computer.
My brother has been using Lenovo since they took over the IMB Thinkpad laptops and he says that ever since Lenovo took over they have been surprisingly mediocre computers compared to when they came out under IBM. Anyone else have any experience with them?If you want a Laptop I suggest Lenovo or Apple.