Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. And black and white T.V.'s82? As in years old? As in born in 1934?? As in remembers WWII, the development of vaccines, color televisions, etc.??
If so, and not to be a complete jerk, but do you comprehend all the ridiculous crap we talk about on here? The reason I ask is because my grandmother is around that age and has never used a computer.
Congratulations and happy birthday! I wish you many more!
Too much for a quick answer Dave. If enough people are interested I would be happy to write a short Autobiography for the forum.Happy birthday! I think if anyone should do an AMA it would be you. I mean, I get crap about being old but you have me beat by 32 whole years!
My question: What did you do for a career (that is, if you are not still working) and how has that profession changed?
Please do.Too much for a quick answer Dave. If enough people are interested I would be happy to write a short Autobiography for the forum.
I broke my new year's resolution (give only hugs) for this. I want to hear all you want to say.Like his post if interested!
The Avatar is closer,I picture you telling your story as either your avatar or the old RAF rooster from Chicken Run...what what!
That's extremely interesting, actually. I'm going to formulate a question or two for ya.
Any questions, criticism?
I heard it in my head like so:I picture you telling your story as either your avatar or the old RAF rooster from Chicken Run
One of my all time favourite men. Also he is old enough to make me feel young!I heard it in my head like so:
--Patrick
While I can't speak as to how much he'd enjoy it, I'm not sure @Grytpipe-Thynne's physique is still capable of your displays of affection.
The paddling is for @fade because he's being naughty!While I can't speak as to how much he'd enjoy it, I'm not sure @Grytpipe-Thynne's physique is still capable of your displays of affection.
Errrrrrr...... No good at that.The remedy is simple. Be naughty.
Nooooo, that doesn't really fall under "naughty". Go talk to @fade; he might have some pointers.Errrrrrr...... No good at that.
You smell sort of like lilacs, and I prefer lilies?
"I prefer the term 'puckish rogue.'"Or @GasBandit. He's very naughty.
And it's a disappointment, each and every time. So far.I'm very naughty. I can't stop posting pictures of my junk in all the nsfw forums ;P
I doubt many people seriously want to see it, in all honesty.And it's a disappointment, each and every time. So far.
Well, true. But I can make jokes about pictures of your junk without coming off as creepy, I couldn't do the same for *throws darts at wall with pictures of random female forumites* AmE or Emrys.I doubt many people seriously want to see it, in all honesty.
Guy junk doesn't have the same allure/appeal that femme nudes have.
By way of explanation for Emrys: You never hear the "don't send pictures of your junk" dating advice given to women. They would almost always be welcome, whereas the opposite is almost never true.Guy junk doesn't have the same allure/appeal that femme nudes have.
You do hear it often, just worded differently and for a different reason, and most often aimed at teenage girls whose boyfriends/manipulative walking bags of hormones try to pressure them into sending such pics.By way of explanation for Emrys: You never hear the "don't send pictures of your junk" dating advice given to women. They would almost always be welcome, whereas the opposite is almost never true.
(speaking in a general sense. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule)
As I believe I've said before, true gender equality will only be possible once women are openly and brazenly as sex-crazed as men.By way of explanation for Emrys: You never hear the "don't send pictures of your junk" dating advice given to women. They would almost always be welcome, whereas the opposite is almost never true.
(speaking in a general sense. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule)
I know plenty of women that are, especially once you get out of the social trap that is high school.As I believe I've said before, true gender equality will only be possible once women are openly and brazenly as sex-crazed as men.
yeah, maybe I shoulda said "unsolicited"You do hear it often, just worded differently and for a different reason, and most often aimed at teenage girls whose boyfriends/manipulative walking bags of hormones try to pressure them into sending such pics.
As I believe I've said before, true gender equality will only be possible once women are openly and brazenly as sex-crazed as men.
I've known plenty of women that weren't shy about their carnal desires. Most of them still thought dick pics looked more silly than arousingAs I believe I've said before, true gender equality will only be possible once women are openly and brazenly as sex-crazed as men.
Hello, Emrys.How the hell did we turn Grytpipe-Thynne's birthday thread into this?
I know plenty of women that are, especially once you get out of the social trap that is high school.
You might know "plenty" in the same way I know "plenty" of gay people. They're still only 5% of the population.I've known plenty of women that weren't shy about their carnal desires.
Maybe so. Just consider though, most slut shaming comes from other women.Maybe it should be "as openly and brazenly sex-crazed without being slut shamed for it."
What the heck woman, you got us down this path with your naughty-talk!How the hell did we turn Grytpipe-Thynne's birthday thread into this?
Quiet, you too. I'm pleading the 5th.What the heck woman, you got us down this path with your naughty-talk!
Be my Guest. I expected maybe a few "Happy Birthdays", this is much more interesting.How the hell did we turn Grytpipe-Thynne's birthday thread into this?
That's a paddlin' for all of us!
My experience has been the opposite. My male co-workers liked to tell tales because they had heard me talk about my adventures outside of work. I had no qualms with talking about my sex life or what I liked. It wasn't professional, but I needed something to keep me awake working midnights. I wore clothes that showed off my body, but also were within the dress code. To them it meant that any man I talked to must be someone I was sleeping with because I was a horny little minx with no morals. It got to the point where I publicly announced that my next tattoo was going to be a Las Vegas style neon sign with an arrow that said "Open 24/7" on the inside of one of my thighs.Maybe so. Just consider though, most slut shaming comes from other women.
If everybody is a slut, then nobody is.
Well, I'm sorry your male co-workers treated you like that, and as with all my confident assertions, YMMV. But doesn't this also help illustrate my other point, that a sexually open and agressive woman is more of a novelty, a curiosity? Granted, this sounds like a "before I was married" kind of story, too, and a whole lot has changed in the last 10-15 years. For both men and women. Consider the rise of the fleshlight into a status one could describe almost as "not just for pathetic losers anymore." The times they are a changin', but I can tell you this much - neither I nor any of my male friends ever got a date they didn't initiate, nor a wife who proposed to them first. I know that doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but it's still a rarity.My experience has been the opposite. My male co-workers liked to tell tales because they had heard me talk about my adventures outside of work. I had no qualms with talking about my sex life or what I liked. It wasn't professional, but I needed something to keep me awake working midnights. I wore clothes that showed off my body, but also were within the dress code. To them it meant that any man I talked to must be someone I was sleeping with because I was a horny little minx with no morals. It got to the point where I publicly announced that my next tattoo was going to be a Las Vegas style neon sign with an arrow that said "Open 24/7" on the inside of one of my thighs.
I think my favorite tale from that time was when a pit boss (who was an openly gay man) and I were talking about BDSM. He was surprised to hear that I liked kink. He asked if it meant I'd bark like a dog for my Dom. He snapped his fingers and I went on my knees and barked - on the casino floor, in the middle of a gaming pit, under the "eye in the sky" with customers and co-workers all around us. It was glorious.
And yet you're the one with the friend who got entrapped by sex, right?Well, I'm sorry your male co-workers treated you like that, and as with all my confident assertions, YMMV. But doesn't this also help illustrate my other point, that a sexually open and agressive woman is more of a novelty, a curiosity? Granted, this sounds like a "before I was married" kind of story, too, and a whole lot has changed in the last 10-15 years. For both men and women. Consider the rise of the fleshlight into a status one could describe almost as "not just for pathetic losers anymore." The times they are a changin', but I can tell you this much - neither I nor any of my male friends ever got a date they didn't initiate, nor a wife who proposed to them first. I know that doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but it's still a rarity.
On that point you are correct. It was prior to marriage and I was a bit of an anomoly (I'm leaving this for you since I cannot spell it right. Weird.) even for the 1990s. However, your example of when you and your male friends were asking women on dates would also have been in that 10-15 years ago category, yes? 2006-ish? Or are you really that young?Granted, this sounds like a "before I was married" kind of story, too, and a whole lot has changed in the last 10-15 years. For both men and women. Consider the rise of the fleshlight into a status one could describe almost as "not just for pathetic losers anymore." The times they are a changin', but I can tell you this much - neither I nor any of my male friends ever got a date they didn't initiate, nor a wife who proposed to them first. I know that doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but it's still a rarity.
The very nature of a trap is that it snares a victim that thought it was pursuing. That she let herself "be caught" doesn't change that he had to chase her. She didn't proposition him, she just responded positively to his advances.And yet you're the one with the friend who got entrapped by sex, right?
Well, maybe you can't spell anomaly, but at least you can spell wierd!On that point you are correct. It was prior to marriage and I was a bit of an anomoly (I'm leaving this for you since I cannot spell it right. Weird.)
Yeah, late 90s, most everybody got married (sometimes more than once) in the early 2000s.even for the 1990s. However, your example of when you and your male friends were asking women on dates would also have been in that 10-15 years ago category, yes? 2006-ish? Or are you really that young?
-----
Aussie and I only got married in 2004, FYI.
Nope. Entirely random. Nobody gets to choose anything other than whether or not to sign up. Ya pays yer money and takes yer chances. That's kind of an important part of the thought experiment.Where is the sign-up list and do I get to choose?
With this group? I don't think many people here, male or female, would have sex for the sake of sex. What if you meet and there is no attraction at all, physical or otherwise? Just shut up, turn out the lights, get it over with, and get out? Why not just have a glory hole and you get who you get? I think people of both genders care more about the emotional/mental side to sex than you're giving them credit for.Supposing every poster (male and female) on halforums was unmarried and unattached. Call it, aliens whisked us all to a parallel Earth where our spouses and children never existed, never to return, whatever.
If we proposed a random weekly match, where each female was given a random male poster for a one night stand of guaranteed obligation-free sex, how many female Halforumites do you think would decide to sign up vs not sign up and continue with traditional "gatekeeper" gender roles? And how many males do you think would sign up, even knowing that as they would greatly outnumber female participants even in a 100% participation situation they stand an excellent chance of ending up with nothing? How many on both sides would participate? How many would continue to participate if it cost $10 a try? $100?
Now we're talking!With this group? I don't think many people here, male or female, would have sex for the sake of sex. What if you meet and there is no attraction at all, physical or otherwise? Just shut up, turn out the lights, get it over with, and get out? Why not just have a glory hole and you get who you get? I think people of both genders care more about the emotional/mental side to sex than you're giving them credit for.
Well, that's part of why I specifically limited it to halforumites - most of us are on at least minimally friendly terms with each other, so it's not a "perfect strangers" situation.With this group? I don't think many people here, male or female, would have sex for the sake of sex. What if you meet and there is no attraction at all, physical or otherwise? Just shut up, turn out the lights, get it over with, and get out? Why not just have a glory hole and you get who you get? I think people of both genders care more about the emotional/mental side to sex than you're giving them credit for.
Heh, maybe an optional checkboxThere's a higher percentage of males on the forum anyway. Is there a two for one night? LOL!
Then you're not as sex crazed as guys quite yetI'm kind of with Wasabi here, at least in the sense of not really equating randomly sleeping around with anyone to owning your sexuality.
I knew what you meant. I needed to make the joke though.Heh, maybe an optional checkbox
But what I meant by higher percentage was that, if we have (rounded off numbers) a total of 100 males and 10 females, I'm betting that a higher percentage of those 100 males will sign up than a percentage of the 10 females. And that's part of the experiment - the guys know they stand an excellent chance of not getting paired up, and they'd still pay to play at a greater rate, I'd assert.
Again, randomly having sex with anything does not have to be a thing. There are both men and women who do not feel the need to do that, and can still have their sexual needs fulfilled.[emoji14]But I'm glad you think that men and women can't be equal until everyone is fucking Gloryholes with @blotsfan.Heh, maybe an optional checkbox
But what I meant by higher percentage was that, if we have (rounded off numbers) a total of 100 males and 10 females, I'm betting that a higher percentage of those 100 males will sign up than a percentage of the 10 females. And that's part of the experiment - the guys know they stand an excellent chance of not getting paired up, and they'd still pay to play at a greater rate, I'd assert.[DOUBLEPOST=1454374645,1454374622][/DOUBLEPOST]
Then you're not as sex crazed as guys quite yet
But it already is a thing.Again, randomly having sex with anything does not have to be a thing.
Yes, and "there are" people with multiple sets of genetalia, and "there are" animals born with two heads. I'm exaggerating here for effect. But my point is, there would be more men willing to engage the randomness than females, because traditional gender roles and society still push the "men as hunters, women as gatekeepers" paradigm. There are always exceptions, but for the most part it's effort for the male and selection for the female. That's a large part of what drives the imbalance we all take for granted - and it's so baked-in a lot of people don't even think about it, or consider undoing it icky.There are both men and women who do not feel the need to do that, and can still have their sexual needs fulfilled.[emoji14]
Ah yes, you're "glad" are youBut I'm glad you think that men and women can't be equal until everyone is fucking Gloryholes with @blotsfan.
Because:If guys are so sex crazed, Gas, then why aren't you having sex with anyone or everyone who is willing? If you're going to pay $10-100 for a chance at sex with a random forumite, then why not a random co-worker (indirect, like another department) or a friend's sister or a strange woman lying in a pond who lobbed a scimitar at you (I hope that was a scimitar...unless you like that sort of thing, which is ok by me). I mean there are a lot of women out there on Craigslist who are hoping for a two minute thirty second ride to paradise. Why not?
Maybe you have. I don't know you well enough to be privy to your sex life. But assuming you are not...you're a sex crazed guy, go get some!
That is, naturally, a large part of what I'm saying. The stigma has to also be burned away.Plus, a woman taking initiative in things like dating is definitely more societal pressure than anything. But many a psychological study shows that women tend to want sex just as much as men. So if what you meant to say was "When women can openly admit to their desires in public without repercussions that men do not face," then your point is valid.
I'm not saying that doesn't happen.. I just think men are, in general, willing to go to greater lengths. Because they're used to having to go to greater lengths.But please do not make the assumption that only men high five each other in the locker room about getting laid.
That may be an entirely valid point. For the vast majority of my adult life I was not allowed to have female friends to hang out with - even online - if I wanted to preserve a harmonious home life.Also, considering that I think your idea of hanging out with women is at work or with the few women on Halforums, I don't know that you have your own adequate sample size. I mean, I made one comment about a boyfriend's fetish once and horrified a bunch of dudes who didn't want to know that much about my love life.
So what I'm gathering here is I should consider moving back to Colorado.Let me just say, of the very large amount of women I know, of my own generation, at least half, if not more of them would totally get randomly laid and brag about it the next day. My friend that does my hair will tell me about the last guy she laid every time I see her.
My post was meant to be absurd. Particularly since you probably wouldn't even sign up for the Halforums Snu-Snu list yourself.Because:
- I'm monsterously depressed and unwilling to do anything about it.
- I know better than to dip my quill in the company ink. That doesn't ever work out well.
- I don't want to risk incarceration for soliciting a prostitute.
I'm sorry if this lowers your estimation of me, but I sure as hell would. Y'all some sexy biznitches.My post was meant to be absurd. Particularly since you probably wouldn't even sign up for the Halforums Snu-Snu list yourself.
I'm sorry if this lowers your estimation of me, but I sure as hell would. Y'all some sexy biznitches.
Well I mean, the vast majority of women I know are also liberal feminists, who would probably make you cry. That's what comes of living this close to Boulder. Of course, you want to live in Co. Springs, so I got nothing.So what I'm gathering here is I should consider moving back to Colorado.
Well, I don't have to TELL them I'm a libertarian, I can just say I share their views on abortion and gay marriage and not bring up anything else. I can fake leftism long enough for a one night standWell I mean, the vast majority of women I know are also liberal feminists, who would probably make you cry. That's what comes of living this close to Boulder. Of course, you want to live in Co. Springs, so I got nothing.
You liar.[DOUBLEPOST=1454377282,1454377258][/DOUBLEPOST]That's it, I'mma make a poll.For what it's worth, I wouldn't sign up.
Pfft, emotional attachment. Who needs it. Not me, no sir. Not one bit.For the record, my point of view is that if there's no emotional attachment, I might as well stay home and masturbate. Less risk, and probably more physically fulfilling in the long run.[emoji14]
Kati did not actually "propose" to me, but she was the one who initiated the conversation that led to us getting married. Does that count?I nor any of my male friends ever got a date they didn't initiate, nor a wife who proposed to them first. I know that doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but it's still a rarity.
But... but you're Canadian!Quiet, you too. I'm pleading the 5th.
Did anybody buy a ring, or get on a knee?Kati did not actually "propose" to me, but she was the one who initiated the conversation that led to us getting married. Does that count?
--Patrick
Rings weren't until later, and neither of us knelt.Did anybody buy a ring, or get on a knee?
But they do have plenty of fifths.But... but you're Canadian!
YOU DON'T HAVE A FIFTH AMENDMENT!
Did anybody buy a ring, or get on a knee?
Aussie and I had a similar proposal. No bended knee. No ring (well I did get a twist tie which I still have in my jewelry box).Rings weren't until later, and neither of us knelt.
I think you didn't properly read. It wasn't the guys you'd get stuck with/in.I respect you guys too much
Well, given the status of the poll, if you were to buy in, you'd probably have about 1 chance in 3. If it were me, I'd throw in my 20 bucks at those odds. Sure beats the lottery.Hmm. Doesn't give me much of a chance does it!!
It honestly wouldn't surprise me if I get grouped with the girls. I'm constantly getting wrongly registered for stuff. Back when I did my national service, I was taken to an entirely different unit from the one I was actually assigned to. But by the time they'd found out, I'd already learned the ropes there, and was actually doing a fairly good job. So instead of sending me to the correct unit, they actually arranged for me to be officially transferred to the one I ended up at.I think you didn't properly read. It wasn't the guys you'd get stuck with/in.
It honestly wouldn't surprise me if I get grouped with the girls. I'm constantly getting wrongly registered for stuff. Back when I did my national service, I was taken to an entirely different unit from the one I was actually assigned to. But by the time they'd found out, I'd already learned the ropes there, and was actually doing a fairly good job. So instead of sending me to the correct unit, they actually arranged for me to be officially transferred to the one I ended up at.
So I might sign up and get bhamv3? ... alright, sure, I'll try anything once.
Leave the goggles on.